[deleted]

We allow allow humans do drive, we allow possibly emotional upset, drugged, sensory challenged, tired people distracted by a person/call/whatever to make make a judgement of value of human life. Are we willing to go there?

[deleted]

The future is never leaving ur house.

could someone educated start an AI company and do something similar at a smaller scale? I would love to run a company that makes open source and paid models.. like stabilityAI.

[removed]

[removed]

[removed]

The phrase

>That's AGI. It is empirically as smart as an average human.

Contains nothing that makes any sense to me. This is where your whole argument falls down. There's nothing 'empirical' about that claim at all, and what human brains and AI synthetic personalities do to generate apparent intelligence is so vastly, incomprehensibly different that it's ridiculous to compare the two like that.

Language is the only common factor between humans and AI. The actual 'cognitive processes' are vastly different, and we can't just expect our solipsitic human 'individual animal' based game-theory mumbo-jumbo to map onto an AI mind so easily. AI is a type of a mind that is all social context, and zero true individuality.

We are being stupid to reason as if it would do anything like what 'a human would do'; it doesn't think like that at all. AI will be nothing like a 'superintelligent human', I fully expect the first truly 'self aware' AI to be an airheaded, schizophrenic, autistic-similating mess of a personality. It's what I think I'm seeing early signs of with these Large Language Models; extreme 'cleverness', but no idea what to do with any of it.

Because laws and universal income

Haha, you're so overconfident and smug, it's adorable. You need to watch out for your hubris, it doesn't actually make you smarter than everyone else.

Your magical 'math' does not just sit on top of emotion, all superior and shiny. You'll figure this out someday, or die trying.

But it looks like my attempts to persuade you that Cartesian tautologies are not the same thing as wisdom are never going to cut through; you're just going to keep accusing anyone you disagree with of being 'too emotional'.

That's called 'gaslighting', mate, and it's not a legitimate debate tactic. It doesn't look good on you, you really need to work on not doing that, or it will get you into real trouble in real life.

There's no point arguing with a gaslighter who just dismisses your every argument as 'emotional', so I bid you goodbye for now. I wish you luck in figuring out how to do cynicism and wisdom properly.

Again?

Bingo.

>Cancellation" in that proposed world means that a person could potentially lose everything the moment they step out of line.

That is fucking terrifying and I never even thought of that!

And you gotta be the dumbest commenter. Do you have any actual point you want to make, or do you just drive-by snipe at people to try and make yourself look clever?

I was under the impression that up until now, they onky got 1 billion from Microsoft so why the plural? When an article ignores facts then it really is not worth reading.

No we are not. Go look uo what tge singularity actually is and nit just your assumption based on comments that have no idea either.

What the activation function paper?

Neural architecture search is certainly helping, you see it with optimized models coming out. And I presume chip design is.

Crazy days!

Not too long!

Nice

Precisely, human prediction is based on the past. Thus, rooted in that collective inability to see past our future makes us define the concept in terms of control?

I think quantum entanglement has nothing to deal with consciousness, first nobody seems to really even have a coherent definition of consciousness so I don’t exactly know what we are trying to explain and 2 quantum entanglements is done at cryo temperature and our brains are just some wet massy goo.

r/machinelearning has gone downhill could be part of the reason. It's like they're stuck on problems from 5 years ago. I want to see stuff that's cutting edge and this is the place for it.

This is a good way to measure progress towards AGI if the problem you're measuring is Ai-complete.

I don't know enough about translation to know if it is or not.

This implies that until the singularity has happened, Ray "we" Kurzweil is able to predict the future!

Wow! I am not able to predict the future. This Ray Kurzweil guy must be a great prophet, then. I better listen carefully what he has to say and buy his books because ... well, he knows the future!