Recent comments in /f/singularity
Saratustrah t1_j5tczyu wrote
Reply to comment by Arcosim in Future-Proof Jobs by [deleted]
Im not sure that thats what the other commenter meant, but animation directing will still be important. Generating and refining scenes and compositions to cater to a certain audience will probably be a valuable skill.
Saratustrah t1_j5tcujg wrote
Reply to comment by Desperate_Food7354 in Future-Proof Jobs by [deleted]
>instantaneous healing
that would be nice, but ASI is not guaranteed to know magic. And yes "sufficiently advanced technology (...) magic", but a machine would still operate under the conditions of physics and the world as is. It cannot find impossible solutions.
KSRandom195 t1_j5tcsn6 wrote
Reply to comment by Talkat in Anyone else kinda tired of the way some are downplaying the capabilities of language models? by deadlyklobber
The context you’re discussing this in is within a post about being frustrated with people saying LLMs aren’t going to revolutionize the universe.
That your referring to LLMs is implied by the context of the post. The whole argument being made is that people like me are wrong because we are “downplaying” the capabilities of LLMs.
In that context you are implying that LLMs will be like the Industrial Revolution and replace our need to think.
I’m saying that claims like yours are where I find fault with that argument. LLMs may be a step on that journey, they may not, but they are definitely not going to cause the AI Revolution on their own
KidKilobyte t1_j5tc6mc wrote
Reply to comment by KSRandom195 in Anyone else kinda tired of the way some are downplaying the capabilities of language models? by deadlyklobber
Not if one human is producing as much as 10 or 100 humans without the LLM. Add to this LLMs will only get better and closer to AGI. The fact that LLMs get better makes it easier and faster to get to better LLMs in the future. At some point you won't need a human in the loop.
vivehelpme t1_j5tc4fv wrote
Reply to comment by Borrowedshorts in Anyone else kinda tired of the way some are downplaying the capabilities of language models? by deadlyklobber
It have been trained on a volume of human generated data greater than any single individual ever have consumed in an entire lifetime.
So it have a lot of real world models and experiences that have shaped it, it's just that all of these are second hand accounts passed over to it.
Talkat t1_j5tbvcl wrote
Reply to comment by KSRandom195 in Anyone else kinda tired of the way some are downplaying the capabilities of language models? by deadlyklobber
I'm not making any claims about LLM's.
The first motors were woefully inefficient and were just used to move water.
If someone said that will change humanity, you would laugh and say, what, this shitty pump?
But the motor evolved and performance increased and it started at more applications than just pumping water.
We are at the dawn of an AI revolution. This is the first iteration of a shitty water pump.
Prompt writers aren't going to be a job. This will be a very brief period of time where you have to spend time to engineer a prompt to get what you want.
KidKilobyte t1_j5tbtpy wrote
Reply to comment by dragon_dez_nuts in Anyone else kinda tired of the way some are downplaying the capabilities of language models? by deadlyklobber
It will be racism soon
vivehelpme t1_j5tbfxy wrote
Reply to comment by civilrunner in This subreddit has seen the largest increase of users in the last 2 months, gaining nearly 30k people since the end of November by _dekappatated
>arr futurology
Climate doomers and green-tech news report central. I'm more disappointed every time I look into that sub.
dragon_dez_nuts t1_j5tb9m3 wrote
Reply to comment by HelloGoodbyeFriend in Anyone else kinda tired of the way some are downplaying the capabilities of language models? by deadlyklobber
True it feels like racism
vivehelpme t1_j5tb6os wrote
Reply to comment by SoylentRox in This subreddit has seen the largest increase of users in the last 2 months, gaining nearly 30k people since the end of November by _dekappatated
For factual accuracy the V2 rockets were a german weapon so if you had nukes on them you'd be defeating the commies and allies in 30 minutes.
XagentVFX t1_j5tamgf wrote
Reply to Anyone else kinda tired of the way some are downplaying the capabilities of language models? by deadlyklobber
The Word Predictor neural net is only half of the architecture of a Transformer, its also got a Attention network that produces Context Vectors. This is a much bigger deal, because this is showing the Ai is building and understanding Context. That is Understanding.
sumane12 t1_j5taf4k wrote
Reply to comment by Air_Holy in This subreddit has seen the largest increase of users in the last 2 months, gaining nearly 30k people since the end of November by _dekappatated
Yes, but only when you consider the alternative.
ChronoPsyche t1_j5ta1cg wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in What ethical ramifications do programmers, corps, & gov take into consideration to protect AI consciousnesses that may emerge? by chomponthebit
Just because it has a mechanism doesn't mean it can necessary be traced and monitored. That's the whole idea behind emergence of anything, that it is a phenomena that came about that was not intended but the result of an unexpected interplay of complex elements.
If consciousness can come about from AGI or ASI is unknown, but researchers have acknowledged the possibility and that is what OP is asking about.
[deleted] t1_j5t9o6k wrote
Reply to comment by grimorg80 in Anyone else kinda tired of the way some are downplaying the capabilities of language models? by deadlyklobber
[deleted]
KSRandom195 t1_j5t8ckm wrote
Reply to comment by Talkat in Anyone else kinda tired of the way some are downplaying the capabilities of language models? by deadlyklobber
This is why I get frustrated with claims that LLMs are “it.” LLMs don’t think, so they can’t do this step function you’re talking about. You can’t run an LLM 24/7 and spit out new ideas, because LLMs aren’t actually thinking.
You can pair an LLM with a human and make that human more efficient. But without the human the original thought bit is missing. This is why people are saying that prompt writers are going to be valuable, because some jobs will be replaced with prompt writers.
When you have to add the human back to the mix a lot of the benefit you’re talking about goes away.
Guesserit93 OP t1_j5t6bhg wrote
Reply to comment by Iffykindofguy in kinky character.ai by Guesserit93
not precisely a chatbot, but you can write really good smut on Novel AI ( NAI )
Cult_of_Chad t1_j5t4tcf wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in This subreddit has seen the largest increase of users in the last 2 months, gaining nearly 30k people since the end of November by _dekappatated
Stop acting like a monkey flinging excrement and you might not be treated like one, just a tip. Your writing comes across as if you've skipped your antipsychotics.
Look to r/Futurology as an example of why community gatekeeping is necessary. If you're here for intelligent discussion no one is turning you away
[deleted] t1_j5t4eyy wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in This subreddit has seen the largest increase of users in the last 2 months, gaining nearly 30k people since the end of November by _dekappatated
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5t47m8 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in This subreddit has seen the largest increase of users in the last 2 months, gaining nearly 30k people since the end of November by _dekappatated
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5t44av wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in This subreddit has seen the largest increase of users in the last 2 months, gaining nearly 30k people since the end of November by _dekappatated
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5t3qkd wrote
meyotchslap t1_j5t3pz5 wrote
Reply to comment by leafhog in Anyone else kinda tired of the way some are downplaying the capabilities of language models? by deadlyklobber
Keep track of those rats, amirite? (Jk, just an amusing typo)
Cult_of_Chad t1_j5t3lhz wrote
Reply to comment by SoylentRox in This subreddit has seen the largest increase of users in the last 2 months, gaining nearly 30k people since the end of November by _dekappatated
>Or "we would be so overpopulated life would suck". Nevermind that governments could require aging clinics to make their clients infertile. You would need a license to have an additional child after your normal reproductive lifetime.
If the government tries to restrict my fertility in exchange for subsidizing life extension I'll just make use of medical tourism for either life extension or reproduction. Poor people that can afford to fly out to breed or access enhancement therapies would be the only ones these laws apply to.
The answer to a growing population is to continue industrializing the solar system. There's enough resources for trillions of us.
roland333 t1_j5t2xna wrote
Reply to comment by AsuhoChinami in Anyone else kinda tired of the way some are downplaying the capabilities of language models? by deadlyklobber
|temporarily relieve our desire to blow our heads off with a shotgun
Well that escalated quickly
KSRandom195 t1_j5td2s9 wrote
Reply to comment by KidKilobyte in Anyone else kinda tired of the way some are downplaying the capabilities of language models? by deadlyklobber
LLMs aren’t capable of thought. So they can not get to AGI on their own, something else has to be done. They may help us get there, they may be a component of the final AGI, but we still need something else.