Recent comments in /f/singularity
BinsarIz t1_j511wd0 wrote
Reply to comment by IronJackk in The year is 2058. I awake in my pod. by katiecharm
It will be like the Matrix, just with non-stop porn.
NotASuicidalRobot t1_j5116o6 wrote
Reply to The year is 2058. I awake in my pod. by katiecharm
I know you are trying to build some sort of perfect world brought about by AI but this seems like some sort of collapse of free will tbh
Akimbo333 t1_j510139 wrote
Reply to comment by Numerous_Comedian_87 in The year is 2058. I awake in my pod. by katiecharm
That's pretty interesting
theBUMPnight t1_j50zhea wrote
Reply to comment by No_Ask_994 in The year is 2058. I awake in my pod. by katiecharm
The AI recognizes your need to feel in control of your breakfast. It generates 5 breakfast choices with identical nutritional profiles but unique tastes and textures.
ElvinRath t1_j50z9ep wrote
Reply to Instead of escaping to virtual realities, what if we just made our reality as good as any virtual reality could be? by [deleted]
I know how to answer this one!
​
For instance, in current VR, we can do things like killing people and risk our (virtual) lives.
​
It is technically possible to do those in real life, but as ChatGPT would say, it would raise some moral and ethical concerns that is important to consider.
​
​
Also, in VR it's probably technically posible to simulate reality bending powers, time travel, planet scale destruction, etc...
Things that are probably not possible in real life. Or not practical, at least...We can't all destroy earth each monday.
​
​
VR should have its place, and real life should have its place too. I mean, I can understand that you don't wanna leave the real world, and I can probably agree with that, but certainly VR offers some things that are just not practical in the real world, or would raise a lot of ethical concerns (And not like the ones by ChatGPT, that it's concerned about everything... real ethical issues, like hurting other people/do things that affect other people... In your own virtual world, nothing of that is a problem.)
MrEloi t1_j50xv28 wrote
Reply to Instead of escaping to virtual realities, what if we just made our reality as good as any virtual reality could be? by [deleted]
Interesting take.
luv_ya t1_j50xcyo wrote
Reply to comment by V-I-S-E-O-N in AI doomers everywhere on youtube by Ashamed-Asparagus-93
Ethics are regularly discussed here from what I’ve seen. Also developing an AGI/ASI does not automatically mean it’ll form into a “devil”. All we’re saying there’s still some level of uncertainty. The problem with even discussing it is that it’s so hard to predict what’ll come out of it, all we can hope for the best. Some might feel it’s not worth the risk but I feel like it considering the potential upside could solve just about every human problem known to mankind if we implement it right.
ZerglingBBQ t1_j50x537 wrote
Reply to OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman won't tell you when they reach AGI, and they're closer than he wants to let on: A procrastinator's deep dive by Magicdinmyasshole
AGI is probably at least a couple hundred years away if it will be a thing at all. They are nowhere close to that right now.
Ahaigh9877 t1_j50x40z wrote
Reply to comment by just-a-dreamer- in The year is 2058. I awake in my pod. by katiecharm
> They also like to be high and have sex, al lot, when they have nothing better to do.
Better?
IcebergSlimFast t1_j50w5q2 wrote
Reply to comment by Gordon_Freeman01 in AI doomers everywhere on youtube by Ashamed-Asparagus-93
“Something that is conscious has to be built in a certain way, which our current computers are not.”
Remarkable! So you’ve single-handedly solved the hard problem of consciousness? Do tell: is consciousness substrate-dependent? What is the specific architecture that makes it possible?
MsSinistro t1_j50vast wrote
Reply to The year is 2058. I awake in my pod. by katiecharm
Sounds dystopian. Read “A Brave New World”
artifex0 t1_j50v0ju wrote
Reply to comment by I_am_so_lost_hello in The year is 2058. I awake in my pod. by katiecharm
NarrowTea t1_j50ufl6 wrote
Reply to The year is 2058. I awake in my pod. by katiecharm
You vill own nothing and be happy
Me in luke skywalker voice : NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Numerous_Comedian_87 t1_j50t9yc wrote
Reply to The year is 2058. I awake in my pod. by katiecharm
One can only dream.
Give me an Open-World RPG of KADOKAWA Crossover game with Re:Zero, Overlord and Konosuba and by open world I mean 1:1 scale open world, dynamic NPCs based on AI and full fluidity of the storyline / quests best on any decision I can make without any restrictions.
Next - give me something like that in League of Legends. Now give me something like that in Cyberpunk2077. Now - Star Citizen. Now put me into a Fantasy World, now put me into a Sci-Fi World.
Generate a whole lifecycle for me as a human under different circumstances. I want to be born in Venice, Italy to a religious Christian Family. I want to be born in Tokyo to an LGBT Couple. I want to be born in Southwest US to an Alcoholic mother and simulate a rise to fame in the style of "rags to riches".
Create Digital Twins of my friends and put them into every world I generate. Make digital twins of my parents and siblings so they will never die and give them their own lives, make their dreams come true. My Father always wanted to be a Teacher - give him a teaching job in Harvard University. My younger brother always wanted to be a Pilot - make him a pilot.
The possibilities are endless. The things AI could do are practically limitless. The key is just
SURVIVING LONG ENOUGH FOR THIS TO HAPPEN.
[deleted] t1_j50rpek wrote
Artanthos t1_j50pkhw wrote
Reply to comment by PoliteThaiBeep in OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman won't tell you when they reach AGI, and they're closer than he wants to let on: A procrastinator's deep dive by Magicdinmyasshole
If your think anything requires zero maintenance your not looking at the larger picture, just one very small piece.
You still have to maintain the entire power grid, pay your employees, replace aging equipment, etc.
Artanthos t1_j50oxgc wrote
Reply to comment by coumineol in OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman won't tell you when they reach AGI, and they're closer than he wants to let on: A procrastinator's deep dive by Magicdinmyasshole
Roko’s Basilisk may want to have a word with you in the near future.
Artanthos t1_j50opyj wrote
Reply to comment by ChronoPsyche in OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman won't tell you when they reach AGI, and they're closer than he wants to let on: A procrastinator's deep dive by Magicdinmyasshole
GPT4 does not have to be AGI to be disruptive.
Shamwowz21 t1_j50oa0p wrote
Reply to The year is 2058. I awake in my pod. by katiecharm
One man’s Utopia is another man’s Dystopia. How I see 2058: is pure conscious energy, no body needed to keep in shape, living a billion subjective years per year with no limitations of knowledge
Warrior_Runding t1_j50nwjc wrote
Reply to comment by PoliteThaiBeep in OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman won't tell you when they reach AGI, and they're closer than he wants to let on: A procrastinator's deep dive by Magicdinmyasshole
To add to this, there are also proposals to converting old, stable mine shafts into gravity batteries. We are coming up to an interesting moment in human development and history.
Artanthos t1_j50nkem wrote
Reply to comment by HeinrichTheWolf_17 in OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman won't tell you when they reach AGI, and they're closer than he wants to let on: A procrastinator's deep dive by Magicdinmyasshole
Hyped or terrified.
With a singularity, it’s impossible to know.
Shamwowz21 t1_j50nb8l wrote
Reply to comment by bubster15 in How long until an AI is able to write a book? by Educational_Grab_473
Perhaps, or one could use the same AI to have any kind of book you wish. I fail to see the use of the ‘real’ author, since I doubt they could dictate the direction I’d want a book better than an AI that adjusts in real-time my preferences whenever I open up my magic book full of anything I want it to be. You’re correct, so long as we don’t have the freedom to make the book ourselves. In fact, it may be seen as limited to even buy a book except for historical or novel purposes (pun intended).
Akashictruth t1_j50miab wrote
Reply to comment by Evil_Patriarch in The year is 2058. I awake in my pod. by katiecharm
Is full dive VR the endgame of civilization? Lol
Direita_Pragmatica t1_j50lm89 wrote
Reply to comment by MrEloi in OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman won't tell you when they reach AGI, and they're closer than he wants to let on: A procrastinator's deep dive by Magicdinmyasshole
Me too...
Also for funding, sure. But I think awareness was important too
OldWorldRevival t1_j5127i6 wrote
Reply to comment by ElvinRath in Instead of escaping to virtual realities, what if we just made our reality as good as any virtual reality could be? by [deleted]
Well... I mean those things are fun and what not. But those are diversions - forms of entertainment, just an expansion of what we already do now, but more complexly, if that makes sense.
That is, they will only add new things to do, forms of empty entertainment. Entertainment itself is rooted in meaning, however! Films, games, movies, TV shows follow storyline, and story reflects lived experience and condenses it.
This is more what I mean. It will add new diversions, addictions and forms of entertainment, but it won't add anything fundamental that we lack without VR.
It's like when people try to fill a void in their heart with things, rather than meaningful experiences with people.