Sure, but the OP's picture tries to compare AI models with the various functions of the brain.

Copying biology is not necessarily the way.

Wrong once again, what a bold statement. Still its just a matter of time and optimalization of such technology. Also I wouldnt be surprised if they checked public opinion on this and were faced with negative feedback.

Why is this important, can’t intelligence structure itself in many ways

That’s the glasses, the headset is still coming this year

Good for them. About time someone stood up to these soulless VC-funded land grabs.

Because it's not conscious

See companion article: Why Falling in Love with Other Humans is a Dangerous Illusion...

I didn't claim it would. Still doesn't work like magic and it won't happen overnight.

As opposed to average straight male sexuality, where we pretend so many of them aren't attracted to teenage girls or worse. Or women and their rape fantasies.

We should judge people by their actions, not their thoughts or fantasies.

I'm about to release a mobile app that uses GPT and Dall-e to create illustrated stories for kids. If you're interested, check out the link: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=not.a.bug.storia. I'm also releasing a test version soon, so if you're interested in trying it out, feel free to DM me.

>The brain doesn't, but let computer watch an expert play chess and he'll beat Magnus Carlsen

The real concern is probably the expectations that get set. If “the average woman considers 80% of men below average” then 30% of women won’t find a man up to her standards and will have to lower their expectations if they want a partner. If an AI is considered at least average, that lowering of expectations doesn’t occur as the AI can fill that gap.

And of course, Futurama had an entire episode on this problem.

I think this underestimates AI and may have been written by someone that never interacted with a newer one.

Sure, but the data is not the problem. The problem is that it has no will on its own, it needs nothing and will only do what it's told.

Yes, that makes sense, to teach/coach people to improve socially. But this isn't a relationship with AI, more so a tool to improve relationships with real people.

The ultimate Turing test

check research about separating two hemispheres of human brain, really creepy

Honestly, DALLE is expensive for an AI API that produces art. Stable diffusion is much better and less censored as well. Plus there's more API options since there's a well of companies providing their own due to SD being open source

There's also a free (albeit greatly rate limited) one from stable horde.

Actually building my own with Evoke (website under construction and almost done, so ignore the missing pricing)

Probably not too far off. The consumer grade AI that you and I will have access to will be cool and keep getting more powerful...but the full unshackled and unthrottled models that are only available in the upper echelons will probably be orders of magnitude more powerful and robust. And they'll use the consumer grade AI as fodder for training the next generation AI's as well, so we'll be paying for access to consumer grade AI but we'll also BE "the product" in the sense that all of our interactions with consumer grade AI will go into future AI training and of course data profiling and whatnot. This is presumably already happening with GPT-3 and chatGPT and the various image generation models, etc. This is kind of just an extension of what has been happening already, with larger corporations and organizations leveraging their data collection and compute to gain advantage....AI is just another step down that path and probably a much larger leap in advantage.

And I don't see anyway to avoid this unless we get opensource models that are competitive with MS, Google, etc. This seems unlikely since the mega corporations will always have access to vastly larger amounts of compute. Maybe the compute requirements will decline relative to hardware costs once we get fully optimized training algorithms and inference software. Maybe GPT-4 equivalent models will be running on single consumer GPU's by 2030 (of course the corps and governments will by then have access to GPT-6 or whatever....unless we hit diminishing returns on these models.

Could be in like 10-15 years!

This is the definition of true AGI. Like duh, when are they going to connect everything up?

There's lots of conversational data for Ai to learn from such as all the big tech in our homes that records our conversations (Alexa, Google Assistant, Siri, etc.), as well as platforms and social media that records conversations, and other future devices such as smart taxis, and home security systems that will also record our conversations.

As far as the appeal, in this case the goal would be using the Ai to teach people how to have better real world friendships/relationships, specifically for people who don't have enough relationship and social skills to be able to get practice with a real person yet.

This is not a goal I made up. I got this from how the article was framed.

Yep. It's a bit nonsensical to worry about AI because they lacks (at the moment) of "real personality" when the alternative is being absolutely alone, with a good chance of being depressed with low self-esteem.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but those are predetermined movements. Now ask a robot to pick up objects randomly placed and it's a fiasco

Yeah definitely

Interesting