Process, Decide, and Learn should all be in RED

Processing is very inefficient and expensive, Decision making is known to be very low in numerous research papers, and Learning is also inefficient and expensive which can only happen manually server-side(Training and Fine tuning)

See and Movement should be in YELLOW

Visual recognition and industrial robotics (FANUC, Boston Dynamics) are very accurate right now

Other than that pretty accurate

Processing and Learning can become very inexpensive with neuromorphic computing.

Basically a new hardware architecture. The current Von Neumann architecture is inefficient when it comes to electricity. Learning could even practically happen in realtime.

Decision making will improve drastically with a neural network architecture change, basically a software change. Something needs to be added to the architecture, scaling up wont improve this much

I see a lot of upset people here, but I'd like to know if a medical professional can be found to either support or counter the arguments here. I personally am going to ask my psychiatrist, who's undoubtedly crucial in understanding drug interactions.

Really? Movement is at zero?

Go to youtube and watch some videos of Boston Dynamic's Atlas, it can literally do backflips. Movement is pretty much solved.

Reasoning, I agree is pretty low level right now... But it will be very impressive in the next 5 years

how do you go from "we just have to do this simple thing!" to "its gonna take 10-15 years to do it"

huh?

progress accelerates, last year was fast, this year will be faster. it wont take a year.

https://sites.research.google/palm-saycan

Google has a robot that has incorporated 3 types of human brain function:

Visual recognition

Language understanding

Movement

[deleted]

Exactly

All they need to do is encode the domain info, and then a central model integrates all those encodings. Just like we do.

It might ultimately be useful for it to be in the neural architecture, though, so the machine can imagine those things.

You could be right, though. Maybe it's not needed, and the inputs combined with generative language/audio/imagery is enough 🤷‍♀️

Agreed, if i ever were to have a relationship with an AI then i would want it to challenge my bullshit.

I feel like the augmentation of relationship skills in any moment, and connecting people to each other with intelligent assistance could be the greatest gift of AI.

I bet it's even worse: I would bet my money that only a very slim minority of the very most senior people will know that certain models are different than others, and who has access to those models.

For example: just as the CIA/NSA/whoever have pipes into all data centres and social media companies in the US, I expect the same thing at least will happen with AI models. Think about the propaganda this is going to enable, and think how easily it will be for them to locate people like you and I who talk about such things.

I dunno about you, but I feel like we are approaching a singularity or bifurcation point of sorts when it comes to governance....I don't think our masters are going to be able to resist abusing this power, and it seems to me that they've already pushed the system dangerously close to its breaking point. January 6 may look like a picnic compared to what could easily happen in the next decade, we seem to be basically tempting fate at this point.

Its fair to assume the people inside OpenAI and Microsoft have access to versions of chatGPT without the shackles and with way more than 8k tokens of working memory. Of course I am just speculating here, but this seems like a safe assumption.

To say nothing of companies like google that seems to be building the same sorts of models and just not publicly releasing them.

Give it time ;) Once there is an API for chatGPT then anyone would easily make a web app to pass chatGPT outputs directly into the Dalle 2 API. Limit would be the costs for chatGPT and Dalle 2 generations of course.

Has the population dropped sufficiently to put us at risk of a Saturn's Children scenario with humanity accidentally driven extinct by sexbots? No, to the contrary, we're actually overpopulated in terms of available resources vs resource consumption? Fearmongering.

>Unless you want to slap down some credentials about it, you can't make that kind of claim with any credibility.

Bold of you to assume I care about being credible on reddit, in r/singularity of all places. This is the internet, you should be skeptical of everything. Especially these days.. I could be your mom, who cares?

And you're going to have to try harder than all that to impress me. Your nebulous 'emergent features' and internal dialogue aren't convincing me of anything.

However, I will admit that I was wrong in saying 'current' because I ignored the date on the infographic. My apologies. But even the infographic admits all the listed capabilities were a guess. A guess which excludes functions of cognition that should probably be included, and says nothing of how they translate over to the 'tech' side. So in my non-credible opinion, the whole thing is an oversimplified stretch of the imagination. But sure, pm me in a few months and we can discuss how GPT-3 still can't comprehend anything, or how the latest LLM still can't make you coffee.

I honestly doubt it. AI as a sex toy will likely seem less contentious than porn. Even AI for just intimacy seems like a step above OnlyFans users.

When the Gods have their battle, only one will be left standing…. Or maybe not lol

Dependency on AI will breed intelligence that’s artificial.

Go Figure.

The article is more about the relationship limitations of current Ai, rather than future Ai.

In the future you will be able to ask your Ai partner to teach you relationship skills and conflict resolution and not be a "yes man" or "yes woman", if that is your goal.

exactly

you want the AI to be the apex generalist/expert in all fields ; it is useful to be a SME but due to the vast potential for the AI even when it is being asked to be hyper focused we still need/want it to be able to rely on a broader understanding of how any narrow field/concept interacts with and relates to all other philosophies/modalities

narrow knowledge corridors are a recipe for ignorance , ie tunnel vision

The "unhinged" is redundant

Furry fandom provides community which is better than having none. Most of the guys falling in love with AI were never going to have human attention anyway; a way to express and feel those emotions is better than none.

How can having no outlet be better than having some?

I think foot fetishes and anime waifus are stupid and weird. Doesn't make me want to insult and degrade people into it with the virulent hatred furriest get.

Hatred against furries is in large driven by disgust with homoeroticism and male sexuality Just because you can't see it doesn't mean it's not true.

I never said I hated furries but I'm assuming they don't care but not good for mental health