Recent comments in /f/singularity
[deleted] t1_j4ap1ek wrote
ElvinRath t1_j4ap0wv wrote
Reply to comment by Magicdinmyasshole in Made a sub for brainstorming about ways to address impeding psychological fallout from the realization that the singularity or somthing like it is probably going to happen in our lifetime. by Magicdinmyasshole
Well, I might be biased by my own thinking about it but I really can't see the drama in that.
What's the matter with being a biological computer? You are still you.
​
I could understand people getting crazy if we were a simulation or something, as basicaly we woudn't be us, really, but just a little part of a bigger computer program.
But as long as I'm individualy me, I just have to deal with whatever comes as best as I can.
​
Being a biological computer or being a flesh miracle with a soul, well...That's just definitions. Reality doesn't change just because we get a very very very fancy AI god tool to makes our life better.
Cryptizard t1_j4aouam wrote
Reply to comment by AdminsBurnInAFire in Don't add "moral bloatware" to GPT-4. by SpinRed
Lol what a clown. I bet you wouldn’t have that opinion if you were on the receiving end of their harassment, which is not protected speech anyway.
Ortus14 t1_j4ano22 wrote
Reply to comment by Azecap in Breakthrough milestone in understanding the reversal of aging by duffmanhb
Yah, I was excited until I read that the scammer known as David Sinclair was behind it. That's unfortunate.
Villad_rock t1_j4aml4m wrote
Reply to comment by OnlineGamingXp in Breakthrough milestone in understanding the reversal of aging by duffmanhb
Link?
ghostfuckbuddy t1_j4am9mc wrote
Reply to Don't add "moral bloatware" to GPT-4. by SpinRed
It is impossible for GPT systems to not have "moral bloatware", a.k.a a moral value system. If naively trained on unfiltered data, it will adopt whatever moral bloatware is embedded in that data, which could literally be anything. If you want an AI that aligns with humanist values you need either a curated data set or use reinforcement learning to steer it in that direction. But however it is trained it will always have biases, it's just a matter of which biases you want.
Final-Birthday2378 t1_j4aljfh wrote
Reply to Don't add "moral bloatware" to GPT-4. by SpinRed
this thread is like the retarded people you see outside gas stations
[deleted] t1_j4alhd7 wrote
Reply to comment by Scarlet_pot2 in Don't add "moral bloatware" to GPT-4. by SpinRed
[removed]
escalation t1_j4akhxz wrote
Reply to comment by eldedomedio in Don't add "moral bloatware" to GPT-4. by SpinRed
Laws vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and frequently conflict. Much of the law is less about morality than protecting established interests. A huge amount of law is rushed legislation based on knee-jerk opportunism.
Teach it fundamental ethical principles instead
Sea-Cake7470 t1_j4akcq9 wrote
Reply to comment by duffmanhb in Breakthrough milestone in understanding the reversal of aging by duffmanhb
What is epigenetic noise???
Taron221 t1_j4ai1wb wrote
Reply to comment by lelandcypress763 in Don't add "moral bloatware" to GPT-4. by SpinRed
I asked it a lot of questions about Diablo and Warhammer lore. It would usually try to answer, but every single time it would remind that Diablo and Space Marines are fiction and can’t hurt me, I guess.
AdminsBurnInAFire t1_j4affd7 wrote
Reply to comment by Cryptizard in Don't add "moral bloatware" to GPT-4. by SpinRed
There’s nothing wrong with supporting free speech.
AdminsBurnInAFire t1_j4afe0e wrote
Reply to comment by gibecrake in Don't add "moral bloatware" to GPT-4. by SpinRed
Imagine living in the 22nd century stuck under an eternal serfdom by a program permanently stuck with the cultural and moral norms of the 2020/30s. Bleating on about how inappropriate cultural appropriation is when you buy a hoverboard from China.
Schyte96 t1_j4aefx0 wrote
Reply to comment by Inevitable_Snow_8240 in Don't add "moral bloatware" to GPT-4. by SpinRed
How many smartphones and servers exist in the world vs desktops? Desktops is massively the minority.
Desperate_Food7354 t1_j4adxhl wrote
Reply to comment by Moist_Chemistry1418 in Breakthrough milestone in understanding the reversal of aging by duffmanhb
If entropy was a valid argument we wouldn’t exist as we are the result of fighting entropy.
ledocteur7 t1_j4ad4x8 wrote
Reply to comment by shmoculus in Realistic humanoid robotic arm that uses artificial muscles has full range of motion and can lift a dumbbell by HumanSeeing
hopefully not too tight for safety.
you wouldn't want it crushing your.. hand. yes, handholding robot..
ledocteur7 t1_j4ad1dt wrote
Reply to Realistic humanoid robotic arm that uses artificial muscles has full range of motion and can lift a dumbbell by HumanSeeing
neat, tho we can't see what the arm is attached to whish makes me thing that there is probably a huge jumble of servos hidden out of sight to make the whole thing work.
but it's definitely promising, and if the ""only"" major problem left is powering it then it has great potential for prosthetics, it might require a backpack or at least a pouch to house the electronics, but between that and not having a functional arm I doubt anyone in need of such a prosthetic would mind wearing a pouch all day long.
and with sensor based brain-computer interface starting to become practical, that opens up a lot of possibility.
the whole thing is relatively simple in principle as well, it's mostly the software that complicated, so making other limbs is probably only a matter of time.
herpetic-whitlow t1_j4absjv wrote
Reply to Don't add "moral bloatware" to GPT-4. by SpinRed
did a bot that wants to kill all humans write this
wise0807 t1_j4abhw9 wrote
Reply to comment by Snipgan in Microsoft to Own 49% of OpenAI Once $10B Deal Closes by lambolifeofficial
Yes, I understand:) massive investment is needed but also a lot of discussion around fair distribution of benefits and moral use of the technology. I don’t know how the government can ensure the latter happens so I believe it’s a loophole. I wish the markets would fund it rather than corporations.
needle1 t1_j4abhiw wrote
Reply to comment by bjt23 in Don't add "moral bloatware" to GPT-4. by SpinRed
At this point, Windows and even macOS have devolved into pretty cruddy UX, but keeps running on massive inertia—which, despite being inertia, has such strong power that few other players can take on them.
OutOfBananaException t1_j4aaypt wrote
Reply to comment by Moist_Chemistry1418 in Breakthrough milestone in understanding the reversal of aging by duffmanhb
Organisms aren't closed systems, entropy as some inescapable feature doesn't apply
shiny_and_chrome t1_j4aap4k wrote
Reply to comment by Inevitable_Snow_8240 in Don't add "moral bloatware" to GPT-4. by SpinRed
I hate subscription software but I happily paid for this. You do you.
[deleted] t1_j4a9xgp wrote
Reply to comment by rixtil41 in Don't add "moral bloatware" to GPT-4. by SpinRed
No you can keep fine tuning it. That's presumably what they are doing with chatgpt to improve it's safety over time.
borderlineactivity t1_j4a7nbd wrote
Breaking my brain 🤯
stinkyfatman2016 t1_j4as1xb wrote
Reply to Realistic humanoid robotic arm that uses artificial muscles has full range of motion and can lift a dumbbell by HumanSeeing
Could this be a possible acquisition for Boston Dynamics?