Recent comments in /f/singularity
Fortkes t1_j49tkhr wrote
Reply to comment by te_alset in Don't add "moral bloatware" to GPT-4. by SpinRed
I think religion was invented so we don't go crazy with existential dread. But sure, later it definitely got 'militarized' which is just another form of false security.
FindingFrisson t1_j49t52h wrote
Reply to comment by tipitipiti in Don't add "moral bloatware" to GPT-4. by SpinRed
You would need a second ai looking at submissions for misuse
DeadliestPoof t1_j49t18v wrote
Reply to Don't add "moral bloatware" to GPT-4. by SpinRed
Question OP, pure intrigue no particular intent.
Do you view AI as a tool? Such as anything that can be wielded such as a hammer isn’t good or bad but if you strike a nail head Vs a human head the tool doesn’t have an alignment?
Or
Or view AI as a entity? That AI will have “intent” at some point and if morality rules aren’t placed it would purely operate in a logical manner in the same way a living organism would operate off “survival instincts” it purely operates off of “logical intent”
I’m hoping this made sense… human lack of intelligence generated this comment
TopHatSasquatch t1_j49swc8 wrote
N0-Futur3uwu t1_j49smtg wrote
Reply to comment by drm604 in Don't add "moral bloatware" to GPT-4. by SpinRed
Well.. u gave me no option.. now I have to searchit
DeadliestPoof t1_j49s08o wrote
Reply to comment by Memomomomo in Don't add "moral bloatware" to GPT-4. by SpinRed
“You never go full retard” x)
[deleted] t1_j49rv5y wrote
Reply to comment by rixtil41 in Don't add "moral bloatware" to GPT-4. by SpinRed
I'm not really sure what you mean since each new iteration will get a different alignment? Also you can fine tune alignment.
AssociateFrequent993 t1_j49rjd5 wrote
Reply to comment by kala-umba in Realistic humanoid robotic arm that uses artificial muscles has full range of motion and can lift a dumbbell by HumanSeeing
Finally can hold my phone with two hands
Fmeson t1_j49rakv wrote
Reply to Don't add "moral bloatware" to GPT-4. by SpinRed
Humans still had to tell alphazero what it was supposed to optimize for. We defined what the rules were and told it what outcomes we wanted.
If we want an AI moral system, we'll similarly have to define the rules and what outcomes we want.
HeinrichTheWolf_17 t1_j49q4d0 wrote
Reply to comment by flyblackbox in Should AI receive a salary by flaming_dortos
I think for a true post scarcity system with physical goods it’ll at least require Hard Nanotechnology. As for time frame, definitely post AGI, I would say at least before this century closes, but again, developed nations will probably get there sooner.
drm604 t1_j49q2ia wrote
Reply to comment by Cryptizard in Don't add "moral bloatware" to GPT-4. by SpinRed
I'd never heard of Kiwi Farms before this mention I just read the Wikipedia entry for it. Holy shit! You're right, it should be blocked from search engines.
phoenixjazz t1_j49pt87 wrote
Reply to comment by Mountain-Award7440 in Breakthrough milestone in understanding the reversal of aging by duffmanhb
If this works as described I’m wondering how society’s are going to deal with a change as massive as this and not shatter under the stress of it. If the death rate drops and the Birth rate stays the same we will need more resources. Will there be enough? If we get a second life after 60 years of toil will it be one of leisure / pursuit of personal interest or will it be 60 more years of toil? Societal changes will likely be huge and the disruptions larger than one might think.
flyblackbox t1_j49pofl wrote
Reply to comment by earthsworld in Should AI receive a salary by flaming_dortos
What’s great about this sub is the readiness to challenge preconceived notions underlying big problems, combined with abstract thought needed to solve them. Sure, sometimes that leads us down some wonky paths with silly premise, but it comes with the territory.
We should encourage this! Be sure not to throw the baby out with the bath water.
NorthVilla t1_j49ozfi wrote
Reply to comment by Gimbloy in Don't add "moral bloatware" to GPT-4. by SpinRed
Religion has never been less important globally than it is today. Even Islam feels tame these days.
flyblackbox t1_j49owpf wrote
Reply to comment by HeinrichTheWolf_17 in Should AI receive a salary by flaming_dortos
How will it happen with physical goods? And what time frame?
NorthVilla t1_j49owbd wrote
Reply to comment by bjt23 in Don't add "moral bloatware" to GPT-4. by SpinRed
Or convenient and proprietary, as it has been in the last 20. There are downsides to be sure, but anybody espousing that Windows has not been convenient for most people is a filthy basement dwelling Linux weirdo.
lelandcypress763 t1_j49nvvx wrote
Reply to comment by Angeldust01 in Don't add "moral bloatware" to GPT-4. by SpinRed
I’ve had it refuse to tell me fart jokes because some people may be offended. It would not return an article criticizing mosquitoes since it was inappropriate to criticize mosquitoes. Now it helpfully reminds me characters like Darth Vader are fictional when I ask for a Vader monologue. I’ve had it refuse to tell me a story where a main character stars off rude and learns to be polite because it’s inappropriate to be rude
I fully understand the need for some safeguards (ie. No I won’t write malware for you), however…
Zealousideal-Skill84 t1_j49m7e7 wrote
Reply to Should AI receive a salary by flaming_dortos
Riddle me what the fuck an ai would do with a salary?? Humans need salarys.. to fucking live. Ais are garunteed existance through funding as long as they continue to be seen as useful or have potential to be seen as useful useful.
SomeAwesomeWaffles t1_j49ll6q wrote
Reply to Should AI receive a salary by flaming_dortos
Equal pay for washing machines and dryers next 🙄
Desperate_Food7354 t1_j49lkz8 wrote
Reply to comment by abdoughnut in Should AI receive a salary by flaming_dortos
lmao
AsuhoChinami t1_j49lhpw wrote
Reply to comment by duffmanhb in Breakthrough milestone in understanding the reversal of aging by duffmanhb
The article's behind a paywall; does it say when the primate trials begin? And how accurate are primate models? I heard that mouse models translate to humans less than 10 percent of the time, whereas testing on human cells does so 81-87 percent.
Desperate_Food7354 t1_j49lh38 wrote
Reply to comment by Specialist_Gas_5021 in Should AI receive a salary by flaming_dortos
Why would it’s behavior be at all similar to humans, we have hundreds of millions of years of reptilian brain development.
Down_The_Rabbithole t1_j49lf0z wrote
Reply to comment by bjt23 in Don't add "moral bloatware" to GPT-4. by SpinRed
>remember people used to think GNU was the operating system of the future because it was open source.
That actually came true though. Almost all servers, supercomputers, embedded systems and mobile systems like smartphones use a Linux-derived system. Essentially the only place where Linux didn't dominate was the desktop PC which is honestly extremely niche in the grand scheme of computing in 2023.
You can safely say that GNU/Linux is the main operating system of humanity in 2023 and be technically correct.
For example you probably wrote your comment on a smartphone running a Linux derived OS. You sending that message to a cell tower running Linux. The Reddit servers receiving the comment running linux. And me reading it back on my linux phone.
madmadG t1_j49tvaf wrote
Reply to comment by Angeldust01 in Don't add "moral bloatware" to GPT-4. by SpinRed
Asking chatgpt on detailed instructions to do anything illegal. Name all the most horrific acts … any of them could be helped by chatgpt using the highest level of sophistication.