Recent comments in /f/rva
aRVAthrowawayy t1_jd35vbw wrote
Reply to comment by fusion260 in Video shows Va. deputies pile on top of Irvo Otieno before his death by fusion260
I’m a resident. I’m not going to NOT take part in my community because a mod didn’t like my opinion on something.
fusion260 OP t1_jd35ghu wrote
Reply to comment by aRVAthrowawayy in Video shows Va. deputies pile on top of Irvo Otieno before his death by fusion260
>My main is banned from here, won’t go into specifics.
aRVAthrowawayy t1_jd35csy wrote
Reply to comment by thats_genocide in Video shows Va. deputies pile on top of Irvo Otieno before his death by fusion260
Media vs law. Attorneys, no. Media, yes. Generates more stories and clicks by sacrificing safety.
aRVAthrowawayy t1_jd357ug wrote
Reply to comment by fusion260 in Video shows Va. deputies pile on top of Irvo Otieno before his death by fusion260
My main is banned from here, won’t go into specifics. The trial is today isn’t it? The “slow” argument doesn’t hold up.
fusion260 OP t1_jd34z3v wrote
Reply to comment by aRVAthrowawayy in Video shows Va. deputies pile on top of Irvo Otieno before his death by fusion260
>But there is also no reason to release it before the trial.
We hear certain politicians and lawmakers try this all the time: "We need to be patient! We need to let the slow wheels of justice turn slowly so we slowly get to our destination in a slow manner so when we slowly arrive, people will have forgotten how unnecessarily long the slow journey went slowly and have moved on to other things."
Defendants file appeal after appeal, push the trial out (potentially for years), in the hopes that the plaintiff or witnesses are no longer available or willing to testify or see a judgement in their favor, or that something else will happen that will cause the trial to be canceled, or that the statute of limitations will expire, or that some law would be written that might exonerate them or prevent them from being tried in court.
Look at how much time out of court a former president has gotten with all of the pending litigation against them, by filing counter lawsuits and appeals, and simultaneously getting an incredible amount of time to sow distrust in the very system they, themselves, are committed to abusing and disrupting.
You posted this from a throwaway account, so I get the feeling that you're not here for a good faith discussion. If you were, you would have used your main account.
thats_genocide t1_jd34yh1 wrote
Reply to comment by aRVAthrowawayy in Video shows Va. deputies pile on top of Irvo Otieno before his death by fusion260
The family asked for the video to be released and the Commonwealth's Attorney agreed:
I seriously doubt that the Commonwealth's Attorney in Dinwiddie County is hoping to cause riots.
aRVAthrowawayy t1_jd33lp7 wrote
Reply to comment by fusion260 in Video shows Va. deputies pile on top of Irvo Otieno before his death by fusion260
Touché. I’m not in law.
But there is also no reason to release it before the trial. What is the point of that? Inciting protests or riots? I’m just seeing different priorities between media and law.
NutDraw t1_jd33bj6 wrote
Reply to comment by princessofbeasts in Video shows Va. deputies pile on top of Irvo Otieno before his death by fusion260
Bear in mind there's usually a concerted effort to brigade those types of stories.
fusion260 OP t1_jd333az wrote
Reply to comment by aRVAthrowawayy in Video shows Va. deputies pile on top of Irvo Otieno before his death by fusion260
I can't see how releasing this video would risk a mistrial. That ship sailed years ago. Taxpayers pay for their public law enforcement, so they have a right to see what that public law enforcement does.
Videos like this—especially partially-redacted videos (this doesn't have sound)—are released more and more (in recent memory) by law enforcement, either voluntarily or via court order, before any trial takes place and those trials don't end in mistrials.
There is zero reason to keep this video from the public out of concern for a "fair trial."
What would meet my corruption scratch-and-sniff test is if the prosecutor also moved to have the video sealed from the public until it's played during the trial as part of their evidence. That would cause people to reasonably doubt which side the prosecutor is on.
szai t1_jd32tu8 wrote
That's cute.
aRVAthrowawayy t1_jd31yen wrote
Reply to comment by augie_wartooth in Video shows Va. deputies pile on top of Irvo Otieno before his death by fusion260
Dropbox links can be set by the owner to allow anyone with the link to view or only allow specific people. I guess it depends on the document; if intended for the jury then the prosecution wouldn’t have all their email addresses to set permissions.
Local news reporting now so point is sort of moot from my civilian perspective. Still, if this is declared a mistrial despite the glaring issues the video shows, it’s gonna be a new can of worms.
augie_wartooth t1_jd31wag wrote
How many “Schooly McSchoolFace” suggestions do you figure they’ll get
fusion260 OP t1_jd31kyn wrote
Reply to comment by aRVAthrowawayy in Video shows Va. deputies pile on top of Irvo Otieno before his death by fusion260
The links were listed in a public court filing. It's not like they were sent by Baskervill (the prosecutor) via an encrypted Telegram message from a burner phone bought by someone in another country and sent to Baskervill via courier pigeon.
Journalists did their job by constantly checking the sources they had without dealing directly with the prosecutor. Looks like NYT was sleeping on this and WaPo made the break.
augie_wartooth t1_jd31euv wrote
Reply to comment by aRVAthrowawayy in Video shows Va. deputies pile on top of Irvo Otieno before his death by fusion260
It was in a public court document—what journalist wouldn’t click a Dropbox link in there?
aRVAthrowawayy t1_jd30c77 wrote
Reply to comment by EdnaPontellier19 in Video shows Va. deputies pile on top of Irvo Otieno before his death by fusion260
Well isn’t that scummy and corrupt, the video speaks for itself. There was obviously zero need for it to be leaked. Looks like the prosecution is allowing activism to take priority over due process. It’s like they want a mistrial.
Wonder if WAPO is in the habit of just snooping at random Dropbox links. I bet they were tipped off. Unbelievable that this got to National news before our own local.
Edit: I’m not mad the video got leaked, I’m mad about how it happened.
freetimerva t1_jd307ij wrote
Reply to comment by princessofbeasts in Video shows Va. deputies pile on top of Irvo Otieno before his death by fusion260
A lot of people think it's okay to kill people. Sad state of the country.
mallydobb t1_jd2zmv0 wrote
Reply to comment by aRVAthrowawayy in Video shows Va. deputies pile on top of Irvo Otieno before his death by fusion260
WaPo went through court documents and found relevant links. The prosecution did not release the video but apparently found a way to ensure the public could find out how in the way court documents were filed. Creative.
I watched the video and part of what stuck out was the number of people that showed up to watch. The whole boondoggle was unprofessional and a huge CF. Aside from emergency people called in to resuscitate everyone in that room, participating or observing, should be charged. The idiot papers over the body and staff doing CPR was doing nothing to help as well. This video shows a reality that staff in that location are unprepared and untrained…among other things.
Danger-Moose t1_jd35vqk wrote
Reply to comment by aRVAthrowawayy in Video shows Va. deputies pile on top of Irvo Otieno before his death by fusion260
> My main is banned from here,
That was a stupid statement.