Recent comments in /f/pittsburgh

PseudoAccountant t1_j8de0xh wrote

Very true. The reality is that you can’t ask people to rehab or rebuild for less than it costs. Asking a carpenter to work for free or half off so that someone can have housing isn’t sustainable and businesses can’t (not won’t) participate in it.

The good news is that there are a lot of ways to ensure that the new homes prevent displacement and fight gentrification; however, this outcome would involve subsidization and public private partnerships. The end result could be low income households (50-80% AMI) being able to own high quality homes in improving neighborhoods with good access to jobs, services, and amenities. This is within reach without levying new tax revenues. But this is unlikely to occur in the near future.

But hey, keep Pittsburgh shitty!

3

PseudoAccountant t1_j8daxqg wrote

We advocated at the mayoral, city staff, URA, and county levels for a more sane policy about the local govt owned homes and lots in city limits and let me tell you: you have no idea how backwards our government is. It’s basically run behind the scenes by idealists who are full of fear and who distrust the public. A classical “we know better than everyone else” kind of group.

There are a lot of reasons given for why they continue to amass lots and have basically no plan or policy for getting these lots back on the tax rolls. One of these fears is displacement/gentrification. And I’d be lying if I said that, given the absolutely insane level of govt ownership of unused lots in the city, there wasn’t at least some validity to that concern.

However, paralysis is what we have. Because they can’t see a perfect way out of this situation, they prefer to delay until they can find one. This is not sane. Some of these lots have been held since the 60’s. The deindustrialization of the 70s and 80s and the ensuing economic chaos here only accelerated the governments REO rolls. They’ve been trying to figure this problem out for 40+ years. More time isn’t the solution.

But that’s not how they see it at all. It’s sad. And we gave up trying to talk about it. The city could do some amazing things with that land. Affordable home ownership is within reach in Pittsburgh for many families that are struggling to make things work. But there is no political will to make this happen. The unelected staff of the city think most of us are ignorant idiots. And there are no adults in the room with enough spine to take action.

I’m hoping that Gainey will prove to be a difference maker, but only time will tell.

7

tesla3by3 t1_j8d79pe wrote

Maybe it’s “Assistant to the Store Manager “?

But seriously, that’s only a bit on the low end, unless the person has a lot experience, then it’s probably very low. On the other hand, aldi stores are much smaller and simpler than a typical supermarket.

3