Recent comments in /f/philosophy

Nick_Beard t1_j6mzf1j wrote

Reply to comment by [deleted] in Great Philosophers Are Bad Philosophers by thenousman

>It's easy to just snipe at areas you think others were wrong

This is actually a fallacy called cherry picking, which is ironic because apparently a good philosopher is someone that doesn't use syllogistic or fallacious thinking.

Pretty sure he's strawmanning as well. If you understand the argument to be absurd despite knowing the person who made it is a famed thinker, maybe you don't actually understand the argument all that well?

10

bumharmony t1_j6mxw5w wrote

Reply to comment by jamminjalepeno in The Conscious AI Conundrum: Exploring the Possibility of Artificial Self-Awareness by AUFunmacy

I believe that reality is basically unfathomable. Under real liberty there are no social contracts on anything. It is like the aftermath of the tower of Babel. (Which to me philosophically does not make ethics impossible)

If human is kidnapped to simulation or VR which is like momma’s house: it has its rules one can’t break or ask their justification, then any gadget or machine can seem conscious as long it does not break those rules. It is not the machine that is given consciousness but the world is simplified or dumbed down even.

−1

AUFunmacy OP t1_j6mktyu wrote

Reply to comment by MainBan4h8gNzis in The Conscious AI Conundrum: Exploring the Possibility of Artificial Self-Awareness by AUFunmacy

No I mean I really don't use ChatGPT, I wrote that because my stories are mostly aimed at people in AI who might suspect that practise as well as Programming and Crypto - which you conveniently omitted. It's also due to the vast amount of posts on the platform which are AI generated (which people are well aware of) and I wanted to assure readers that I do not artificially generate my content.

Please tell me which excerpts? I wrote all of this based on research and my own ideas.

0

Adorable-Tank4891 t1_j6l79z3 wrote

Reply to comment by No_Maintenance_569 in God Is No Longer Dead! (A Kritik of AI & Man) by No_Maintenance_569

"God is, as a conceptual matter (that is, as a matter of definition) an unlimited being"

Unlimited of what? Of bullshit? If the A.I. being trained with a bunch of bad data, it will quickly become obsolete bs tho.

Logic is just a tool human use to fathom things. There are things before humanity. How can we fathom/record/decribe it? Lol, we are so limited.

E.g: There are events, and things happen that cannot be prove by logic. Such as accidents. You can "try" to convince ppl such an event happened, but it cannot be proven true (if there are no evident recorded) >Conclusion, logic is not tool to prove everything, so it is limited and "IS NOT unlimited". Including the question "does God exist?", logic cannot prove existances.

Logic is just a tool to convince ppl things true or false...which is an (dis)agreement from 2 (or more) ppl.

Your A.I god is bs. It just a tool mate, no more no less. God the creator, is good, and unlimited good. He can't denied himself (meaning he cannot changing, look up this in the bible and u will see). An unlimited evil is imposible, because God doesn't allow it to be so.

2