Recent comments in /f/philosophy
bradyvscoffeeguy t1_j6l2y1w wrote
Heyooo so anyone tired of all the Continental bullshit you have to engage with nowadays??
bradyvscoffeeguy t1_j6l2dsl wrote
Reply to comment by Grim-Reality in /r/philosophy Open Discussion Thread | January 30, 2023 by BernardJOrtcutt
It's funny because most articles will get through no matter their (poor) quality but original posts and comments will get blocked and deleted. I haven't been around enough to notice Tate posts. I think he is a fucking scumbag and an idiot, and I imagine you could get some fucking bad misogyny in anything related to him because hey this is reddit, and I imagine there's a point when that violates sub rules. I mean I I think it's in everyone's interest for the level of discourse to be above the 4chan shit you can find on other subreddits. Anyway I'm not familiar with the post you're talking about so I don't know if this is relevant.
D_Welch t1_j6kz0y0 wrote
Reply to comment by Ok-Mine1268 in God Is No Longer Dead! (A Kritik of AI & Man) by No_Maintenance_569
[Does not being able to define precisely thought or consciousness mean we look at any chat bot and say ‘dang, that thing could be self aware!’?]
No I don't believe it means that. Why would it? If it COULD be, then you test for it until it proves that it is. Our problem to start with is not knowing with certainty what Thought or Consciousness actually is.
And that is exactly what an atheist would NOT say. If you can't prove something exists, it is just an idea in your head. Whether or not billions of people subscribe to some variation on the theme does not prove anything, and therefore you should NOT start worshipping whatever it happens to be.
[deleted] t1_j6krrb8 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in God Is No Longer Dead! (A Kritik of AI & Man) by No_Maintenance_569
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6kpsdp wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in God Is No Longer Dead! (A Kritik of AI & Man) by No_Maintenance_569
[removed]
VersaceEauFraiche t1_j6kos33 wrote
Reply to comment by kgbking in On Whether “Personhood” is a Normative or Descriptive Concept by ADefiniteDescription
I appreciate your thought out response. I shall return when I have the energy to muster. Hopefully in the next few days.
kgbking t1_j6knqkn wrote
Reply to comment by VersaceEauFraiche in On Whether “Personhood” is a Normative or Descriptive Concept by ADefiniteDescription
Hey mate, what did you think? Do you have some agreements with me? :D
JonBonFucki t1_j6kg9aa wrote
Reply to comment by Solutide in On Whether “Personhood” is a Normative or Descriptive Concept by ADefiniteDescription
thank goodness that's not your job. I don't have any interest in baseless conjecture and whining.
howlingwolfpress t1_j6kby3m wrote
Reply to "Like painters bring brush to canvas and sculptors set chisel against marble, so do the magnificent use their wealth to bring about beauty and inspire wonder in their people's eyes. Thus Aristotle calls them artists" - On Generosity and Magnificence, Nicomachean Ethics by SnowballtheSage
For me, art patronage is one of the wisest things that money can be used for: https://chowcollection.medium.com/the-art-patronage-vade-mecum-65ef44aacbf2
bumharmony t1_j6jwfaq wrote
Reply to comment by Grim-Reality in /r/philosophy Open Discussion Thread | January 30, 2023 by BernardJOrtcutt
Since say one this has been a religious, rather a philosophical community. Not that I would like to discuss Tate in particular.
Solutide t1_j6jq5j1 wrote
Reply to comment by JonBonFucki in On Whether “Personhood” is a Normative or Descriptive Concept by ADefiniteDescription
How is that slogan equal to the people making all the decisions of the government? What do you think “running” something mean? If you own a car, then you lend that car to friend to drive, who do you think is driving the goddam car? Just bcs you own the car, and have the right to take back the car if you so choose, doesn’t mean you are “running” the car. And if your friend kill someone with your car without your knowledge, you don’t take responsibility for your friend action. Does that make sense? Or I suggest you go read a book or something. Its not my job to be your teacher.
Grim-Reality t1_j6jlosd wrote
Reply to comment by Mysterious_Case6656 in /r/philosophy Open Discussion Thread | January 30, 2023 by BernardJOrtcutt
Are the IAI people mods on this subreddit or are connected to them? They lock threads and silence people left and right under the guise of broad meaningless rules that can be interpreted in a myriad of ways. Removing comments is questionable at best, but locking threads to prevent further criticism when it’s not going in a favorable direction to the article is simply unwarranted. The amount of censorship in this subreddit is beyond astounding considering this is a philosophy subreddit. Wtf is going on here? When someone says something they don’t like, it’s gone in an instant. There was some unwarranted criticism towards a Tate piece but the mods just silenced the whole thread and removed everything. This is beyond disgusting and a serious abuse of power. Even though I liked the piece very much, the censorship and the silencing of people and their opinions is alarming.
Why can’t people talk about what they dislike and like, people have died throughout all of history to fight censorship like this, yet these mods are extremely abusive with their power. It’s a distasteful abuse of power, in a subreddit where difference of opinion and skepticism should be encouraged, not silenced. Locking whole threads and preventing people from commenting or posting is extremely backwards. It’s not a good sign for a philosophy subreddit to be like that.
BernardJOrtcutt t1_j6jklto wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Andrew Tate, Nietzsche , and The Matrix | The appearance-reality distinction that underlies Tate’s references to the Matrix stretches all the way back to Plato. Nietzsche warned the belief reality is accessible only to the few is a dangerous life-denying ideology. by IAI_Admin
Your comment was removed for violating the following rule:
>Argue your Position
>Opinions are not valuable here, arguments are! Comments that solely express musings, opinions, beliefs, or assertions without argument may be removed.
Repeated or serious violations of the subreddit rules will result in a ban.
This is a shared account that is only used for notifications. Please do not reply, as your message will go unread.
BernardJOrtcutt t1_j6jkklt wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Andrew Tate, Nietzsche , and The Matrix | The appearance-reality distinction that underlies Tate’s references to the Matrix stretches all the way back to Plato. Nietzsche warned the belief reality is accessible only to the few is a dangerous life-denying ideology. by IAI_Admin
Your comment was removed for violating the following rule:
>Argue your Position
>Opinions are not valuable here, arguments are! Comments that solely express musings, opinions, beliefs, or assertions without argument may be removed.
Repeated or serious violations of the subreddit rules will result in a ban.
This is a shared account that is only used for notifications. Please do not reply, as your message will go unread.
BernardJOrtcutt t1_j6jkke0 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Andrew Tate, Nietzsche , and The Matrix | The appearance-reality distinction that underlies Tate’s references to the Matrix stretches all the way back to Plato. Nietzsche warned the belief reality is accessible only to the few is a dangerous life-denying ideology. by IAI_Admin
Your comment was removed for violating the following rule:
>Argue your Position
>Opinions are not valuable here, arguments are! Comments that solely express musings, opinions, beliefs, or assertions without argument may be removed.
Repeated or serious violations of the subreddit rules will result in a ban.
This is a shared account that is only used for notifications. Please do not reply, as your message will go unread.
BernardJOrtcutt t1_j6jkh3n wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Andrew Tate, Nietzsche , and The Matrix | The appearance-reality distinction that underlies Tate’s references to the Matrix stretches all the way back to Plato. Nietzsche warned the belief reality is accessible only to the few is a dangerous life-denying ideology. by IAI_Admin
Your comment was removed for violating the following rule:
>Argue your Position
>Opinions are not valuable here, arguments are! Comments that solely express musings, opinions, beliefs, or assertions without argument may be removed.
Repeated or serious violations of the subreddit rules will result in a ban.
This is a shared account that is only used for notifications. Please do not reply, as your message will go unread.
BernardJOrtcutt t1_j6jkguo wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Andrew Tate, Nietzsche , and The Matrix | The appearance-reality distinction that underlies Tate’s references to the Matrix stretches all the way back to Plato. Nietzsche warned the belief reality is accessible only to the few is a dangerous life-denying ideology. by IAI_Admin
Your comment was removed for violating the following rule:
>Read the Post Before You Reply
>Read/watch/listen the posted content, understand and identify the philosophical arguments given, and respond to these substantively. If you have unrelated thoughts or don't wish to read the content, please post your own thread or simply refrain from commenting. Comments which are clearly not in direct response to the posted content may be removed.
Repeated or serious violations of the subreddit rules will result in a ban.
This is a shared account that is only used for notifications. Please do not reply, as your message will go unread.
BernardJOrtcutt t1_j6jkgmm wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Andrew Tate, Nietzsche , and The Matrix | The appearance-reality distinction that underlies Tate’s references to the Matrix stretches all the way back to Plato. Nietzsche warned the belief reality is accessible only to the few is a dangerous life-denying ideology. by IAI_Admin
Your comment was removed for violating the following rule:
>Argue your Position
>Opinions are not valuable here, arguments are! Comments that solely express musings, opinions, beliefs, or assertions without argument may be removed.
Repeated or serious violations of the subreddit rules will result in a ban.
This is a shared account that is only used for notifications. Please do not reply, as your message will go unread.
BernardJOrtcutt t1_j6jkdh6 wrote
Reply to Andrew Tate, Nietzsche , and The Matrix | The appearance-reality distinction that underlies Tate’s references to the Matrix stretches all the way back to Plato. Nietzsche warned the belief reality is accessible only to the few is a dangerous life-denying ideology. by IAI_Admin
Please keep in mind our first commenting rule:
> Read the Post Before You Reply
> Read/listen/watch the posted content, understand and identify the philosophical arguments given, and respond to these substantively. If you have unrelated thoughts or don't wish to read the content, please post your own thread or simply refrain from commenting. Comments which are clearly not in direct response to the posted content may be removed.
This subreddit is not in the business of one-liners, tangential anecdotes, or dank memes. Expect comment threads that break our rules to be removed. Repeated or serious violations of the subreddit rules will result in a ban.
This is a shared account that is only used for notifications. Please do not reply, as your message will go unread.
No_Maintenance_569 OP t1_j6jfi3b wrote
Reply to comment by WrongAspects in God Is No Longer Dead! (A Kritik of AI & Man) by No_Maintenance_569
I see
[deleted] t1_j6jfgdb wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in God Is No Longer Dead! (A Kritik of AI & Man) by No_Maintenance_569
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6jerh1 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Andrew Tate, Nietzsche , and The Matrix | The appearance-reality distinction that underlies Tate’s references to the Matrix stretches all the way back to Plato. Nietzsche warned the belief reality is accessible only to the few is a dangerous life-denying ideology. by IAI_Admin
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6jcygh wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Andrew Tate, Nietzsche , and The Matrix | The appearance-reality distinction that underlies Tate’s references to the Matrix stretches all the way back to Plato. Nietzsche warned the belief reality is accessible only to the few is a dangerous life-denying ideology. by IAI_Admin
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6ja6kf wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Andrew Tate, Nietzsche , and The Matrix | The appearance-reality distinction that underlies Tate’s references to the Matrix stretches all the way back to Plato. Nietzsche warned the belief reality is accessible only to the few is a dangerous life-denying ideology. by IAI_Admin
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6l4doo wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in God Is No Longer Dead! (A Kritik of AI & Man) by No_Maintenance_569
[removed]