Recent comments in /f/philosophy

AllanfromWales1 t1_j2a84jx wrote

A bit simplistic. If someone or some corporation gets rich through (for instance) selling fried chicken, they're gonna want as many people as possible to have enough money to buy their product. Starving people don't drive capitalism forward.

10

Alphamoonman t1_j2a49ha wrote

You'd be surprised what people can do when they come together and just do something. I say you'd be surprised because it's utterly uncommon near-completely to find nowadays. That's what makes psychology so interesting; you begin to understand the behind-the-scenes of the human condition of each and every walk of life. You know why something does or doesn't happen, and you know why it will continue to happen or not happen.

While nobody likes the idea of being slave to their instincts as we put a lot of money on independence and uniqueness, denial of that fact, and the comfort such denial provides, is ironically an instinct many humans immediately default to. Another irony is that the faulty humans known often as misanthropes are the best at getting past their instincts, and not enjoying seeing human instincts and their detrimental effects on societal outcome from outside the box of influence.

1

BernardJOrtcutt t1_j2a1my5 wrote

Your comment was removed for violating the following rule:

>Read the Post Before You Reply

>Read/watch/listen the posted content, understand and identify the philosophical arguments given, and respond to these substantively. If you have unrelated thoughts or don't wish to read the content, please post your own thread or simply refrain from commenting. Comments which are clearly not in direct response to the posted content may be removed.

Repeated or serious violations of the subreddit rules will result in a ban.


This is a shared account that is only used for notifications. Please do not reply, as your message will go unread.

1

BernardJOrtcutt t1_j2a1mrb wrote

Your comment was removed for violating the following rule:

>Read the Post Before You Reply

>Read/watch/listen the posted content, understand and identify the philosophical arguments given, and respond to these substantively. If you have unrelated thoughts or don't wish to read the content, please post your own thread or simply refrain from commenting. Comments which are clearly not in direct response to the posted content may be removed.

Repeated or serious violations of the subreddit rules will result in a ban.


This is a shared account that is only used for notifications. Please do not reply, as your message will go unread.

0

BernardJOrtcutt t1_j2a1mf9 wrote

Your comment was removed for violating the following rule:

>Read the Post Before You Reply

>Read/watch/listen the posted content, understand and identify the philosophical arguments given, and respond to these substantively. If you have unrelated thoughts or don't wish to read the content, please post your own thread or simply refrain from commenting. Comments which are clearly not in direct response to the posted content may be removed.

Repeated or serious violations of the subreddit rules will result in a ban.


This is a shared account that is only used for notifications. Please do not reply, as your message will go unread.

1

BernardJOrtcutt t1_j2a1262 wrote

Your comment was removed for violating the following rule:

>Be Respectful

>Comments which consist of personal attacks will be removed. Users with a history of such comments may be banned. Slurs, racism, and bigotry are absolutely not permitted.

Repeated or serious violations of the subreddit rules will result in a ban.


This is a shared account that is only used for notifications. Please do not reply, as your message will go unread.

1

BernardJOrtcutt t1_j2a09q1 wrote

Please keep in mind our first commenting rule:

> Read the Post Before You Reply

> Read/listen/watch the posted content, understand and identify the philosophical arguments given, and respond to these substantively. If you have unrelated thoughts or don't wish to read the content, please post your own thread or simply refrain from commenting. Comments which are clearly not in direct response to the posted content may be removed.

This subreddit is not in the business of one-liners, tangential anecdotes, or dank memes. Expect comment threads that break our rules to be removed. Repeated or serious violations of the subreddit rules will result in a ban.


This is a shared account that is only used for notifications. Please do not reply, as your message will go unread.

1

probability_of_meme t1_j29zed9 wrote

Not just agreement on which problems, but polar opposition on what is a problem and what isn't. I don't think it's completely surprising to imagine the wealthiest would see eliminating world hunger (in any humane way) as detrimental to their power and influence. They know very well they're better off with lots of starving people around.

2

321-Blast_Off t1_j29qu5k wrote

There is only one tribal side that won't make nice because the other tribe is supposed to be a danger to them. I will say many of the issues can be fixed by science. But things like global warming aren't as cut and dry as people want to believe. The best thing we can do to reduce global warming is to raise up the global poverty rate significantly to where people everywhere live better lives.

1