Recent comments in /f/personalfinance

banhammerrr t1_jae93ce wrote

Ask for a breakdown of the costs, always ask questions. You probably paid a deposit and the last months rent or something like that. If you moved in half way though the month, the 250 sounds right but just ask for an explanation. Your lease will also tell you exactly what that 1300 was for and that should clear it up. You would probably owe the 600 + the 250 if that’s the case but just double check.

Good life advice, give people the benefit of the doubt but always make sure the numbers add up.

2

pickymeek t1_jae92fj wrote

I'm not sure. (PDF warning)

Under "Why not 100% stocks?"

> In short, although a strategy that fully invests a retirement portfolio in stocks can be perceived as riskier than most alternatives, is that really the case? Is a strategy that has the lowest probability of failure, provides the same or better downside protection, and higher upside potential really riskier than other strategies simply because a retiree is more uncertain about (how much higher will be) his bequest? If not, then having a retirement portfolio fully invested in stocks is a strategy that should be seriously considered by retirees.

1

Gzngahr t1_jae904c wrote

One of my first job interviews after college was a bit of a bait and switch. Something like “Analyst position at major finance company”. Turned out to be a group interview trying to find people to sell life insurance.

There was only one happy person in that building and it was the “star salesman” who was around 30 and drove a Ferrari. I later learned his dad founded the company and he took over when dad retired.

The sheer misery for everyone else was palpable. Over hearing people on phones trying to sell this crap to relatives and acquaintances.

Years later I got cold called by the same company by completely different people to interview for the same thing. I went in just to waste their time. The only people I recognized from round 1 were Ferrari and his secretary.

8

MGK_1223 t1_jae8x06 wrote

Are you buying on Treasury Direct or on a brokerage? If TD and you have the discount rate, you can use the following formula with $100 as face value and 30 days as time: Price = Face value (1 – (discount rate x time)/360).

If through a brokerage, the price should be directly listed.

1

IntelligentHalf4367 t1_jae8hug wrote

What I would do with what I know of your situation is do the local credit union where she will be living for checking and a credit card, then do a savings account online with Ally, Wealthfront, etc that pays higher interest so she has the habit of using that account as she gets older.

1

IceCreamforLunch t1_jae8bbr wrote

Absolutely not. You can borrow money for a house (and just about anything else while you're working) but you can't take a loan for retirement.

Also:

>I'm just thinking my rent money gains me absolutely nothing. Its a full net loss.

That's not true. It buys you housing.

>Whereas my 401k(all index funds) will return what like 10% at best per year over my lifetime?

Which adds up to a LOT of money by the time you retire.

>I'm spending 20k/year on rent, so why not just take the 401k hit but actually contribute to a mortgage instead of just pissing money away in rent?

Rent isn't just 'pissing money away' and houses have a lot of costs that will also feel like you get nothing for, like taxes, insurance, maintenance and repairs, etc, etc.

2

FourWayFork t1_jae7ylh wrote

By the way, READ THE CONTRACT from when you were hired and they paid your bonus.

Exactly what does it say about repayment if you don't stay a certain period of time? Is it supposed to be prorated?

Is there anything that your employer did where they are in breach of the contract?

You say the hours are insane. Is there anything they are doing that is potentially illegal?

(You could potentially go to a lawyer if they are doing something illegal.)

4

Who_GNU t1_jae7uwq wrote

What doesn't make sense is getting into debt, if you already have experience in an engineering role. It also doesn't make financial sense to switch from a field that is under saturated with employees to one that is over-saturated, but if that would make you happier, then it trumps the financial incentive.

Do you have experience programming? Even Verilog and VHDL experience would carry over software development, as would scripting, such as using shell scripts or TCL. Your best bet to make the transition is to spend a few years working for a small semiconductor company, in your current line of work, that would also let you take on programming projects. If you haven't asked yet, see if your current company will let you.

Experience is far more valuable than earning a degree in a different field, so if you can transition your experience from electrical engineering to programming, it'll be a much better use of your time, and you won't have to go into debt.

1

MGK_1223 t1_jae7net wrote

These are annualized. To find what you'd actually make, you can take the par value ($100), subtract the price you're paying for the T-Bill, and divide by the price you're paying. That'll get you the yield for the period between you buying the bill and the maturity date (30 days for yours).

2

innkeeper_77 t1_jae7dlh wrote

A 401k loan is somewhat better than actually “raiding” it but if the market recovers while the loan is out that is obviously a terrible idea.

If OP could pay it back very quickly it wouldn’t automatically be a terrible idea especially if they can get a better interest rate that way.

1