Recent comments in /f/personalfinance

Crazy-Inspection-778 t1_jabkhyd wrote

I used to have the same problem, here's what I do: break down after-tax pay into three categories- short term expenses/fun, medium term goals (new car, travel etc), and retirement. Decide percentages for each that make sense for your income and lifestyle. Right now I'm doing 50-25-25 respectively. That way you make sure your future goals are taken care of but you're also giving yourself permission to spend money on the present. Adjust those percentages until you're happy with the balance/results.

1

_joeBone_ t1_jabkfeh wrote

This life doesn't come with an expiration date. It can all go away at any moment.

Don't live with regret. Grab it by the nads.

Unless you are dreaming of a nice golf cart ride to the Winn-Dixie twice a day. You won't spend it on cool shit when you get old. live

2

ThrowawayTink2 t1_jabk679 wrote

Reply to comment by _joeBone_ in Father getting divorced by waynekop

He promised me babies "when we had more money in the bank' 'better health insurance' 'fixed up the house to be safe for a baby' and a half dozen other valid sounding excuses. Once I realized he was trying to run my clock out, I thought I was 'too old' to start over. (I wasn't). Then the crash of 08 hit. Took me another 10 years to climb out of that financially. I was okay being the breadwinner. The dealbreaker was when I was given a chance to adopt a newborn and he blocked the homestudy. Done. Took me two more years but I was done the day he refused the homestudy. I walked away and never looked back.

2

honey-smile t1_jabjvzj wrote

They’re legit. They make money in a myriad of different ways but they’re not screwing people over (at least not from what I’ve heard and personal experience).

It’s just a different way to pay for something. In contrast, you could often get 1-3% back if you bought it with a credit card (and assuming you had the cash to pay it off without accruing interest) so it isn’t always a better deal.

5

ThrowawayTink2 t1_jabji1d wrote

So it may be different in your state, but I owned my house before my ex and I got together. I paid every payment from my own account, and we never co-mingled money in it.

My lawyer (correctly) advised me that he was not entitled to anything I owned before we got together, but if we had mixed money he would have been entitled to half the increased equity.

However, since the house was purchased before they got together and your stepmom only owns half, best case scenario, at least in my state, would be the increased value of 1/2 of the house, and only if they co-mingled money. Since Dad paid rent to Stepgrandma, I don't think that is the case. It establishes a tenant/landlord relationship.

If there is a second mortgage on the house, it is most likely in both stepmom and stepgrandmas name. Dad isn't entitled to any of Step Gma's wealth.

Definitely meet with a lawyer, find out Dads rights. If you don't like that lawyer, interview another. I think SMom probably had her ducks in a row before the split. Good luck.

2

ahj3939 t1_jabjf29 wrote

Doesn't sound dumb at all.

Only thing is at Fidelity (and many other such as Schwab) they'll charge you a fee around 50-75 to buy 3rd party mutual funds.

Therefore what you should do in the retirement accounts is buy a Fidelity mutual fund such as FSKAX. It's a total market fund just like VTSAX but you won't pay the fees (it's like saying McDonalds vs Burger King, sure you might light the Burger King logo better but at the end of the day it's cheap found with approx. the same nutrition)

In fact I would argue the Fidelity fund is better since the expense ratio on that particular fund is less than half of Vanguard's.

I think the main thing is planning and setting goals. Maybe contribute more to IRA instead of taxable. Does your employer have a 401k match? If so you should take advantage of the free money.

5

ThrowawayTink2 t1_jabipga wrote

Reply to comment by _joeBone_ in Father getting divorced by waynekop

>I mean, after 25 years, this nest egg was built together. Just because she had the banger job doesn't mean he contributed any less....

Pffft. In the 20+ years my ex and I were together, he worked low value under the table jobs or no job at all. "We" did not build any nest egg 'together'. -I- worked my arse off 60-80 hours a week to keep heat, food and the house from going into foreclosure. He in no way deserved half, and he didn't get it either.

7