Recent comments in /f/personalfinance

kdieick t1_j6nyxna wrote

Yes, credit utilization is how much of your credit you are using. If you bought something you haven't paid for yet, then you're utilizing your credit. They don't only report it on your billing date or after you pay it off. Someone maxing out their credit card is seen as a higher risk for non-payment.

If you can, use less of your limit until you can increase your limit.

2

Informal_Distance t1_j6nyn6d wrote

> The IRS cares about getting its money at some point and they are actually quite flexible about payment plans.

THIS. The IRS represents the US Government, an institution that has been around for 234 years. They don't care how long it takes or how little you pay at a time. Re-payment plans can be a lifetime but they won't care because they will get it back eventually. For them it is a marathon not a sprint.

146

tmoney144 t1_j6nylxk wrote

As someone who used to do what Optima does, you can screw your dad by talking to the IRS direct. The IRS will try to get financial info from you, like expenses, etc. There are some expenses that require proof, and some that don't. For the expenses that don't require proof, there is a set number the IRS will give you if you ask. But if you say a lower number, the IRS will take that and not tell you you could have said a higher number. If you say a low number and Optima says the set number, IRS will say "sorry, taxpayer already told me that expense." Which could cause your dad to have to pay more money. I think Optima charges too much, but if you've already paid them, you might as well see it through and don't undermine what they're trying to do.

37

CrazySteeeveee t1_j6ny9km wrote

If you clear, the price of the car, every month. I dont see the need to pull from 401k. Save for a month or 2. Pulling from 401k has a bunch of steps and conditions. Pulling from your savings doesn't, especially when you can replace within 2 months

1

SereneFrost72 OP t1_j6nxkrd wrote

I was quite surprised at how many people said to not communicate at all with the other insurance company and to direct them to my insurance company. I'm not sure I'd trust 2 external parties to coordinate with each other on my behalf in a timely manner, let alone 1 external party. Just seems like I'd be making it very difficult to resolve things if I just refused to talk to the other person's insurance

1

TyrconnellFL t1_j6nxen3 wrote

The only reason to invest is if you think the market will, eventually, go up. That’s been the trend, so that’s the thinking.

No one is any good at figuring out when it will go up or down in the short term. If this is the low point, of course you should buy! If it’s going to drop further, you should wait! But nobody knows.

Because the market on average tends to go up; at any given time investing now on average means you’ll capture more of that growth, and waiting means on average you’ll miss out out growth. Not always, like you saw over the last year, but usually.

The biggest mistake with a lot of investing is being too nervous. Missing the gains and only investing afterwards is also a way to at least lose in opportunity cost.

1