Recent comments in /f/personalfinance

sonnyfab t1_j2ftl5k wrote

>Do you just not like to travel?

No. I travel extensively. But I keep my travel budget entirely separate from my emergency fund. I only use my emergency fund for emergencies. That's why I have an emergency fund.

>plan to buy a house in 2030 based on my projections. We’d be paying cash. Why would we need to dial back retirement savings?

If you think you'll be able to save enough cash to purchase a home with cash in 7 years and continue to save 25+% of your income for retirement, then you don't need to dial back. However, most people intend to spend a lot more than you apparently are intending to spend on their home.

6

lucky_ducker t1_j2ftb2p wrote

They are literally the same fund. Different share classes of the same, underlying Vanguard fund. If you have at least the minimum $3K buy-in for the mutual fund, it is six in one, half dozen in another.

That said, I would suggest the mutual fund as the better choice because: a.) mutual funds are designed for fractional shares, so you never have a few dollars of uninvested money sloshing around like you would if all your investments were full shares of an ETF, and b.) mutual funds only post an updated NAV once a day after the markets are closed. If you are the sort of investor that monitors your investments too closely, seeing the ETF dropping in real time can be disconcerting. You probably should choose the mutual fund.

3

ahj3939 t1_j2ft84f wrote

It's an error. It's why I do not like to give out card and agree to any billing (because for sure they had you sign document saying they can bill your card for anything outstanding).

What you should have done back then was 1) notify of error 2) give reasonable 7-10 days for resolution 3) If not resolved dispute with bank.

32

Apples799 t1_j2ft4es wrote

If you have an intention on how your donation is used make sure funds that are donated are considered "Restricted" funds. e.g if you want to feed animals with the Humane society, pay for staff bonuses, etc..

But if you let leadership decide how to use the funds they are considered "unrestricted". "unrestricted" funds will usually be used by the Non-profut board and executives to spend as they see fit.

2

Berty-K OP t1_j2ft1sc wrote

Interesting. Do you just not like to travel? That’s where most of it goes for us. We go on ~4 vacations per year. At least one abroad.

I plan to buy a house in 2030 based on my projections. We’d be paying cash. Why would we need to dial back retirement savings? Sorry, not sure what I’m missing.

−3

cheejiburga OP t1_j2ft1f0 wrote

I think I misread some stuff. I think I mean like, whatever is taxable. I read in the link up above that if I don't have access to a 401k to use a taxable account. Aren't IRA's considered taxable? Sorry if I'm making this more confusing..

2

PrinceDusk t1_j2fsnho wrote

>Still, if I walked away from things I didn't have experience with, I would always be walking and never learn a thing.

yes, but the problem is there's easier ways to gain experience - the issue isn't doing something you've never done before, the problem is doing something in the hardest way to learn. It'd be like skipping an electrician's school and going straight to work as a non-apprentice.

2