Recent comments in /f/personalfinance

avalpert t1_j2a8me3 wrote

Why would you want to avoid carryovers? They can be used in future years either to offset higher-taxed ordinary income or future capital gains.

Accumulating stashes of capital loss carryovers is a valuable part of a comprehensive tax-management strategy.

3

CompostAwayNotThrow t1_j2a8g2j wrote

I think you'd have to make a lot more money to make up for a loss in flexibility.

Could you find a job that is as flexible and pays more? Maybe, but it's really hard to know what the working environment is like until you actually work somewhere (unless you know someone well who already works there).

If you do leave, make sure you leave on good terms, so you could always return if you want to in the future.

2

avalpert t1_j2a86eo wrote

It would still come down to the nature of the arrangement between A and B - is the $20k a straight contribution of capital to the enterprise that is expected to be repaid, is it a form of purchasing their 50% share in the profits (with B doing so through other means), etc.

1

yamaha2000us t1_j2a7x2d wrote

Find out what the car is selling for before going into the dealer.

Go to your bank and find out what they can do for a car loan. They love to give loans to customers with good credit.

Do not discuss down payment until you find out the final price of the car.

Do not discuss down payment until you hear the financing plan and compare it to the bank offer.

Be willing to say no.

When you choose to buy the car, adjust the financed amount by your down payment.

4

Tdanger78 t1_j2a7s8a wrote

I wish I could work from home but my job requires I work on a secured network. My wife works from home and homeschools our daughter. My job covers all health, dental and vision, and I’m not even close to maxing retirement for 401k or IRA. You’ve got a young family and I can’t say enough that having the flexibility your current boss allows you is something you may not find. Money might be nice, but that flexibility loss will absolutely cause issues your husband isn’t considering. Y’all have it pretty sweet, I wish I could work from home and be with my kids more but I’ve got a decent job with great benefits.

29

DeluxeXL t1_j2a7edt wrote

A proper TLH swaps among a pair of similar but not identical funds, so being out of market isn't an issue. However, if you have suboptimal substitute, you can be stuck with it (e.g. going from total stock to S&P 500 and being stuck with it, reducing your holdings from 4000 to 500.

If you tax loss harvest (TLH) while you are in a low tax bracket, you don't save much tax.

If you TLH, your new cost basis is lower, and you reset holding period to short term. Therefore, you might find rebalancing more expensive in the next 12 months.

Also, it can be easy to mess up a TLH with wash sale if you have the same pair of funds in multiple accounts or have DRIP on.

6

TheDigitalMango t1_j2a7dsj wrote

I understand the point about the plateau but $100k is just not it for HCOL/VHCOL areas. Here in SF Bay Area, rent for a 3bd can easily be over $3k (mortgage likely as much or more), and OP said childcare, though temporary, is $3100/mo. So that’s $73k+ already without accounting for any other expenses, savings, etc. at all. Bringing in $200k versus $100k for example would make a world of difference in quality of life and financial security.

4

buzzkiller6 t1_j2a6lmv wrote

I think you means 8 hours of OT a week and you have out your average pay of $35.7/hr with OT differential included from the math (assuming a differential exists). That isn’t terrible, but if you’re working 8 hours of OT a day, that’s terrible. It doesn’t sound flexible at all as that’s 80 hours a week. And at $87k a year, the math doesn’t work.

1

pancak3d t1_j2a6f1b wrote

TLH basically pushes a bigger tax burden into the future. If you want to take the tax savings now and use the $$ for something, it's sensible.

I would be careful to only TLH enough to avoid carryover -- you can only negate capital gains + 3k of ordinary income each year.

1

avalpert t1_j2a678q wrote

The real answer is it depends on the nature of the arrangement between A and B - was A covering prepaid expenses in lieu of B covering labor (for example),there are an infinite number of possibilities here, hopefully they have there shared understanding down in writing.

1

wild_b_cat t1_j2a5lo8 wrote

The only downside is if you're in a low income year. If you are, then this year you want to harvest gains and not losses, particularly if you can do so in the 0% long-term cap gains bracket.

Otherwise, TLH is generally beneficial if you're in your working years, since it's moving some income from this year to a future year when your tax rate will probably be lower.

That being said, if you need to sell investments to fund a Roth IRA, that typically makes sense whether those investments are at a gain or a loss.

2