Recent comments in /f/nyc

atari_Pro t1_jbph0lm wrote

Genuine: someone explain how congestion pricing helps the MTA money problem? Quick glance, it looks like it would solve no problems for the MTA and only (maybe) reduce traffic while also costing avg people more out of pocket. Other than the net positive of reducing emissions, which could be achieved in a 1000 other ways, congestion pricing seems to only reward the corruption within the MTA/state. Lmk if I’m crazy.

5

MandatoryDissent55 t1_jbpg7ag wrote

>The switch will provide some new benefits, such as routine hearing and vision exams, hearing aids, and mental health care provided via telemedicine.

These are not new benefits. They were already provided by medicare. The difference is that this aDvAntAgE pLaN requires pre-approval for certain benefits, which only serves to deny healthcare to people who would have had access under the medicare plan.

104

47mmAntiWankGun t1_jbpe7rx wrote

Organized Labor moving forwards with this was probably an under-the-table part of the negotiations with DC37 on the labor contract. Those 3% raises had to come from somewhere - remember that the city went into negotiations with a starting line of 1.5%, and, that when the medicare advantage deal was first negotiated under DiBlasio it was expected to save the city $600M annually.

30

yasth t1_jbpe6hw wrote

It is (more or less) true though, the first Bond issue was in 1951, with a start of 1952. Biden was born in 1942. I mean you can find a promise from the 20s onward, but since he was 10 is at least not crazy wrong.

Truthfully it is a good reminder that the good old days weren't perfect. NYC took a funded project frittered away most of it on other random projects and tore down the elevated line (under real estate lobby pressure) before even seriously attempting to replace it, and didn't manage to build anything for 60 years, and that only a shadow of the plan.

20