Recent comments in /f/nyc
[deleted] t1_jbk8dof wrote
Reply to comment by sumgye in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_jbk855f wrote
Reply to comment by PauI_MuadDib in NYC comptroller says city’s approach to migrant crisis is financially unsustainable by Grass8989
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jbk7z77 wrote
Reply to comment by icrbact in NYC comptroller says city’s approach to migrant crisis is financially unsustainable by Grass8989
[removed]
olli_bombastico t1_jbk5aqz wrote
Reply to comment by supremeMilo in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
People who order overpriced food don't need the tax revenue.
washyoass t1_jbk59n6 wrote
Reply to Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
Not In My Back Yard
[deleted] t1_jbk48kv wrote
Reply to comment by Everyoneeatshere in NYC comptroller says city’s approach to migrant crisis is financially unsustainable by Grass8989
[removed]
queensnyatty t1_jbk435m wrote
Bloomberg tried to do this years ago. I wonder if Adrienne Adams had a position on it back then. BdB opposed it before all of a sudden deciding it was his idea when he became mayor.
Brooklyn-Epoxy t1_jbk2356 wrote
Reply to Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
I'm all for a charging station and rest stop, but that empty newsstand was great when it was a little coffee space that served everyone in a public plaza. We should not have to give up a great-looking newsstand when there are plenty of other charging bathroom options in the area that could be used.
CactusBoyScout t1_jbk204c wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Build on Public Housing’s Open Spaces, N.Y.C. Council Speaker Says by k1lk1
Because the projects were built by Robert Moses
thatisnotmyknob t1_jbk1vrj wrote
Reply to comment by unknownsender2 in Monthly Discussion Thread - Month of March, 2023 by AutoModerator
1.8! Walked 677 miles in '22
supremeMilo t1_jbk1evb wrote
Reply to comment by olli_bombastico in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
At the end of the day you aren’t just subsidizing the companies, you are subsiding the customer/end user.
TheHonorableSavage t1_jbk1anl wrote
Reply to comment by 139_LENOX in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
Literally a system where the least productive members of society control the city’s development.
A well-adjusted person doesn’t have time to show up and debate every time a parking spot is added or removed, a bike path installed, a liquor license awarded, or a building refurbished. They elected a representative to make those calls. This just rewards the 10 people radically against something in the face of the 1000 people moderately for it. And many of these people’s identities revolve more around what they are against than what they are for.
Entire-Builder-9836 t1_jbjzzbz wrote
Reply to Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
Ok what if we clap and bang our pots and pans in the streets at 7pm instead
hollow-fox t1_jbjzckd wrote
Reply to comment by dumberthenhelooks in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
I stopped ordering door dash after VC stopped subsidizing it - maybe like 5 years ago haha. I just realized the solution was for me to call a restaurant for pickup and bike myself. Turns out it was quicker, cheaper, and plus side of exercise.
But yeah, in reality pedestrians suffer because the side walk is so much smaller than roads with parking for cars. I am all for eliminating all free parking and returning the space to bikes and pedestrians.
dumberthenhelooks t1_jbjyrom wrote
Reply to comment by hollow-fox in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
I’m always happy to get rid of parking spaces, but the reason they congregate where they do is bc it’s an easy location for them to pick up deliveries and that’s the fault of the apps. So it would be a moving target at which point you’re giving a business free real estate. I would like the apps and the restaurants to pay for this inconvenience personally. I should note. I don’t use DoorDash or Uber eats and almost never seamless, I’d rather just call a local restaurant with its own delivery people and not a chain restaurant
NatLawson t1_jbjymf6 wrote
He's learned from the US slavery constitution that denied human beings the right to live free.
b1argg t1_jbjwf1f wrote
Reply to comment by bklyn1977 in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
Make them elected then, not political appointees. It's still a bastion of NIMBY power though, and that power needs to be eroded.
139_LENOX t1_jbjw3gz wrote
Reply to comment by bklyn1977 in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
This is kind of naive. Sure I'd love to contribute to my CB meetings, but I have a full time job and not a lot of free time. I'd imagine that lots of folks are in the same boat.
You know who has the time to participate in CB meetings? Old rich retirees. Which is why CBs are universally full of curmudgeonly NIMBYs.
Die-Nacht t1_jbjuoug wrote
Reply to comment by ObjectivePitiful1170 in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
I may be spoiled, as I'm part of Queens CB6. Though it has its nimbys, they don't seem to run everything.
bklyn1977 t1_jbjthwr wrote
Reply to comment by mowotlarx in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
I served for two years. I think we need more younger people involved. Members are not elected by popular vote as this is not a role in public office.
I will advise you that you should have a record of attendance and involvement with your community board before applying as that will factor into the decision. Call directly to your borough president office (you may have elected that person) and they will guide your through the process.
You probably have much to bring to the table.
heystarkid t1_jbjswlv wrote
Reply to comment by CGNYC in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
I agree! Just wanted to point out that it’s unrealistic to think that it wouldn’t be passed down to the consumers.
mowotlarx OP t1_jbjs5mc wrote
Reply to comment by bklyn1977 in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
Oh of course, your Community Board isn't like other Girls.
Are the members elected by popular vote in an open election in your district?
AfroPanther t1_jbjs3uy wrote
Reply to Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
The delivery people should def have somewhere to go. But this specific block is too packed as it is. It would be a madhouse at the 72nd 1/2/3 train stop if it was also packed with e-bikes. Broadway and Amsterdam cross over at this exact location so it’s already very packed with the subway, pedestrians, and cars.
CGNYC t1_jbjr17a wrote
Reply to comment by heystarkid in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
These delivery services are not a necessity… if the cost of them go up to make the drivers job halfway decent while making it fair to the community in which these rest stops are, I have no problem with that. If paying delivery fees and service charges are not within your budget, pick up.
AnacharsisIV t1_jbk8jgt wrote
Reply to comment by Mrsrightnyc in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
Because that would be an "employee perk" and these guys are explicitly not employees.