Recent comments in /f/nyc
bklyn1977 t1_jbjootl wrote
Reply to comment by b1argg in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
The participants at my meetings are neighbors and lifelong residents. Taking away this forum is a disservice to the community. Why fight for less means of involvement?
b1argg t1_jbjoo41 wrote
Reply to comment by StoryAndAHalf in The Number of Rent-Stabilized Apartments Registered in Ridgewood Plummeted. ‘Substantial Rehabilitations’ Could Help Explain Why. by vanshnookenraggen
It's also Polish
bklyn1977 t1_jbjohfa wrote
Reply to comment by mowotlarx in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
I would love to invite you to my community board to see all the corruption. Instead you will just stay mad on the internet.
edit: our meeting and hearings are announced here where you can register to attend:
https://www.nyc.gov/site/brooklyncb16/announcements/announcements.page
mowotlarx OP t1_jbjng6t wrote
Reply to comment by bklyn1977 in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
Oh please spare me with this phony civic duty crap. It is justifiable to criticize Community Boards (whose members ARE NOT ELECTED) and the elected Council members who bow down to them to the detriment of the rest of the city and surrounding neighborhoods. Telling people to vote (I do) and run for office (lol there are 51 council members in a city of almost 9 million) is lazy. The CB system is corrupt and outdated and our elected are too scared of them to ever change the system.
ObjectivePitiful1170 t1_jbjn9k2 wrote
Reply to comment by Die-Nacht in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
> CBs are supposed to allow a Public Comments section at the beginning of every meeting.
Again, different CBs are run different ways. CB11 prides itself in not doing it when they don't want to. They called it efficiency. It is, in fact, the most efficient CB in the entire city!
> There are also committees for all sorts of topics, where you can sign up to present and get resolutions passed.
Stop by the BK CB11 transportation meeting when the DOT is coming over briefly suggesting safety improvements to realize how little the CB has to do with the community. You will see some real marvels that day.
someliskguy t1_jbjn8ov wrote
Reply to comment by dumberthenhelooks in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
I was so confused when I first walked past that location because it has a chick-fil-a logo on the door and I thought they’d opened some kind of mini store or something.
It’s a great thing though— it has among other things alleviated the delivery people from taking over the public space at 84th & 3rd and provides these folks with much needed bathrooms and a climate controlled space to rest.
larrylevan t1_jbjmvdp wrote
Reply to comment by FalseParticular9162 in NYC ‘Bling Bishop’ Lamor Whitehead hit with new fraud charge by iv2892
Adams claims this guy as a friend and vowed to get the “stolen” jewelry back.
tonka737 t1_jbjmoht wrote
Reply to comment by hatts in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
What percentage of society do you think uses delivery services enough to warrant society footing a bill for a QoL improvement?
b1argg t1_jbjmjsq wrote
Reply to comment by bklyn1977 in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
there's no "involvement" when the "representatives" are unelected. CBs are an overcorrection from Robert Moses and simply exist to empower NIMBYs.
tonka737 t1_jbjmc26 wrote
Reply to comment by sanjsrik in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
Entitled to what? They are paying for the service.
bklyn1977 t1_jbjm95c wrote
Reply to comment by mowotlarx in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
Are you expressing this travesty to your rep? Your borough president? Those council members won't be there forever. The next one should be you.
tonka737 t1_jbjm75k wrote
Reply to comment by mrchumblie in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
Can't they rest at the park 2-3 blocks from there?
Everyoneeatshere t1_jbjkyb0 wrote
Reply to comment by orangejuicecake in NYC comptroller says city’s approach to migrant crisis is financially unsustainable by Grass8989
You’re kinda out of touch
heystarkid t1_jbjktlq wrote
Reply to comment by sumgye in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
There’s no way they’ll pass the extra cost down to the consumer? That’s exactly what they’ll do. Uber makes users pay the congestion surcharge if you travel below 96th st.
mowotlarx OP t1_jbjk8df wrote
Reply to comment by ertebolle in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
Oh, they'll continue to get their expensive Citarella deliveries. But they don't want to have to see the poor wretches who bring them their food. Ick!
[deleted] t1_jbjk78c wrote
Reply to comment by CactusBoyScout in Build on Public Housing’s Open Spaces, N.Y.C. Council Speaker Says by k1lk1
[deleted]
mowotlarx OP t1_jbjk3ic wrote
Reply to comment by bklyn1977 in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
>My board meetings are all about getting our council rep to work for us.
Like I said, community boards wield a ton of power despite not being elected officials or being representative of a community. They have Council members under their thumbs for the most part, and especially in wealthier areas the boards are able to kill most public projects that would benefit someone other than themselves. It's a travesty.
bklyn1977 t1_jbjji2w wrote
Reply to comment by b1argg in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
Or instead of abolishing community involvement you should take part instead.
Die-Nacht t1_jbjjb2b wrote
Reply to comment by koreamax in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
If you don't get it, see if your CB has "public members". These are like board members, but:
- They can't vote on the main board meeting
- They don't have to show up to the main board meeting
- They are only assigned to one committee (board members are assigned to at least 2), which they have to go to, and they get to vote on
This is a great way to get involved, without the large time sink, and usually increases your chances of getting into the main board in the future. Also, note that the committees are where stuff usually happens. The main board vote is big and loud, but committees are the ones that actually get shit done.
Not all CBs have public members though. So email them and ask if they do. If they don't accept you, you may get automatically invited to be a member, but check with them anyways.
b1argg t1_jbjj81v wrote
Reply to comment by MissCherryPi in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
Which you won't be if you aren't politically connected
bklyn1977 t1_jbjj3bj wrote
Reply to comment by Unfair in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
They president appoints members based on applications. I have done a two year term. I am not wealthy or white.
b1argg t1_jbjj37x wrote
Reply to comment by bklyn1977 in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
CBs are unelected and should be abolished
FalseParticular9162 t1_jbjiy5o wrote
These are the kind of people Mayor Adams associates himself with. I love the pictures of them hanging. So friendly!
dumberthenhelooks t1_jbjivxz wrote
Reply to comment by No_Cap_3837 in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
They are definitely not stepping in out of the goodness of their hearts. They are opening a second location that is about equidistant from where they put this pit stop. I’m also pretty sure that the number of complaints they’ve been getting means they have to do something to ease the congestion. The community will act at some point is they don’t
hollow-fox t1_jbjq87a wrote
Reply to comment by dumberthenhelooks in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
It’s almost like we could convert two free parking spaces that serve two people for a hundred or so bikes. Why are they competing for sidewalk space?