Recent comments in /f/nyc
ChrisFromLongIsland t1_jbf4qy5 wrote
Reply to comment by natekrinsky in With an absentee corporate landlord, Upper Manhattan tenants unite to demand repairs by natekrinsky
Well when things are so bad that the artificially controlled rents don't cover the building costs it's hardly the profit motive.
Though there are plenty of situations where buildings were basically worthless and not worth keeping up. There were many examples in American cities in the 70s and 80s. Or go on abandoned porn on reddit.
ChrisFromLongIsland t1_jbf4az9 wrote
Reply to comment by pixel_of_moral_decay in With an absentee corporate landlord, Upper Manhattan tenants unite to demand repairs by natekrinsky
Most buildings that I am aware of let the tenants finance big construction projects. Also buildings need maintenance. If the owners don't want to pay for the maintenance of their building I don't know what to say.
LeicaM6guy t1_jbf34z2 wrote
Reply to comment by Louis_Farizee in With an absentee corporate landlord, Upper Manhattan tenants unite to demand repairs by natekrinsky
But no less satisfying.
robul0n t1_jbf2qz9 wrote
Reply to comment by mowotlarx in 4 hurt (one critically) at Lafayette and Canal wall collapse. Site had previous safety violations. by cla1r1t1n
Yep, and that was a high profile job, now imagine all the other low-rise buildings that fly under the radar.
mowotlarx t1_jbf2exz wrote
Reply to comment by robul0n in 4 hurt (one critically) at Lafayette and Canal wall collapse. Site had previous safety violations. by cla1r1t1n
>rubber-stamped by a retired 80 year old architect or engineer that's basically sold their stamp.
There was a fascinating story about this awhile ago with an architect who claimed he didn't even know his name/stamp was being used to approve a massive hotel at Hudson Yards.
pixel_of_moral_decay t1_jbf1v2e wrote
Reply to comment by ChrisFromLongIsland in With an absentee corporate landlord, Upper Manhattan tenants unite to demand repairs by natekrinsky
The problem is enforcing, especially with a poorer population. Telling someone who makes < $100k, they owe $50k in the next 90 days or it’s going to get legal is not pretty, but the reality of this proposal.
$50k per unit doesn’t even go that far when you’re talking about a neglected building. Even well maintained buildings need a surprise $10-15k every now and then for random projects. $50k for a neglected building is hardly a crazy high number.
Current owners would just be subsidizing wealthier people/investors who would buy up the foreclosures while losing their savings in the process.
IMHO that’s predatory.
robul0n t1_jbf1ar0 wrote
Reply to comment by mowotlarx in 4 hurt (one critically) at Lafayette and Canal wall collapse. Site had previous safety violations. by cla1r1t1n
You're kinda right but it goes deeper than that. Pretty much all building inspections are performed by third party companies by ownership. In theory, the inspectors and safety people are there to keep the contractor in check so the owner doesn't get sued to oblivion when someone dies. In practice, there are a lot of owners who act as their own GCs with little actual oversight.
It's even worse when you realize that a lot of building plans are drawn up by developer's in-house CAD people, and then rubber-stamped by a retired 80 year old architect or engineer that's basically sold their stamp.
poboy212 t1_jbf0p3p wrote
Reply to The Leaning Tower of New York City by geoxol
I worked on the 40th floor of a building near Madison Sq Park and it would sway visibly in windy days. We would often get seasick. It was awful.
SuperTeamRyan t1_jbf044s wrote
Reply to comment by JaredSeth in With an absentee corporate landlord, Upper Manhattan tenants unite to demand repairs by natekrinsky
Alternatively they're waiting for their nypost supported candidates to get in and change the laws back.
ChrisFromLongIsland t1_jbezymd wrote
Reply to comment by pixel_of_moral_decay in With an absentee corporate landlord, Upper Manhattan tenants unite to demand repairs by natekrinsky
Yea when you own a building it comes with responsibilities.
CactusBoyScout t1_jbezwvg wrote
Reply to comment by casicua in With an absentee corporate landlord, Upper Manhattan tenants unite to demand repairs by natekrinsky
If they require cash it’s typically because their coop is poorly-run financially and can’t get approved by banks to take mortgages. So you wouldn’t want that coop anyway.
Trust that the owners would love to take mortgages because it means they could sell their units for more. But their financials aren’t good enough.
CactusBoyScout t1_jbezehe wrote
Reply to comment by jakeuznslao in With an absentee corporate landlord, Upper Manhattan tenants unite to demand repairs by natekrinsky
You’re saying convert NYCHA to coops or convert rentals to NYCHA?
Airhostnyc t1_jbey1y6 wrote
Reply to comment by Louis_Farizee in With an absentee corporate landlord, Upper Manhattan tenants unite to demand repairs by natekrinsky
Lol I mean they kind of urinated on the law
Jimmy_kong253 t1_jbexvbs wrote
Reply to With an absentee corporate landlord, Upper Manhattan tenants unite to demand repairs by natekrinsky
To me if the tenants can make a case that the building owner is absentee and it can pass muster with a court. The building should then become a co-op with a board and everything that takes ownership.
ny773 t1_jbexhtb wrote
Reply to comment by WorthPrudent3028 in The Leaning Tower of New York City by geoxol
Yeah, the top floors don't matter when they were meant to be shell/stash houses for foreign money that never intended to live in them anyway. Can't wait for the same thing to happen to the Penn/MSG project.
PauI_MuadDib t1_jbewsm8 wrote
Reply to NYC comptroller says city’s approach to migrant crisis is financially unsustainable by Grass8989
The city's approach to a lot of things is financially unsustainable. NYPD broke records last year for misconduct settlements. Taxpayers had over 121 million of their hard-earned tax dollars just flushed down the toilet. And in 2023 we're going to have to deal with wrongful conviction lawsuits from those almost 2k cases connected to the NYPD'S Joseph Franco scandal.
Because to Adams tax dollars grows on trees and is neverending. Pfft it's not like that money could've been used to do something crazy like benefit the entire community....
WorthPrudent3028 t1_jbevsbf wrote
Reply to The Leaning Tower of New York City by geoxol
Looks like the top floors would feel like living on a boat even if it's built right. I don't know why billionaires want to live at the top of these new super narrow skyscrapers.
Im guessing this skeleton will sit there for a decade before tax money pays for it to be taken down when it becomes too dangerous. All parties at fault will be bankrupt shell companies whose owners will still be wealthy but pay nothing towards fixing or removing this building. There's another unfinished new tower by Hudson Yards that is sitting there because they faked architect approval.
Louis_Farizee t1_jbevp05 wrote
Reply to comment by Airhostnyc in With an absentee corporate landlord, Upper Manhattan tenants unite to demand repairs by natekrinsky
Tinkers. Tinkling with the law is something different.
deekay007685 t1_jbevf4b wrote
The cameras will fine drivers in their sleep
icrbact t1_jbev3h7 wrote
Reply to NYC comptroller says city’s approach to migrant crisis is financially unsustainable by Grass8989
I find Ron DeSantis’ human trafficking operation as disgusting and inhumane as the next guy, but you do have to admit that it’s working. People who continuously have denied that the US has a problem at the Southern border are waking up to the fact that they simply cannot house all the people arriving. That’s what Florida and Texas have been experiencing all day every day for years. Many of the ‘solutions’ are shortsighted and inhumane, but solutions are needed that decrease the inflow quickly and sustainably. Denying the problem doesn’t help anybody, least the migrants whose sky-high expectations can never be met.
deekay007685 t1_jbev2hs wrote
Reply to comment by 1AngryBrotha in NYC comptroller says city’s approach to migrant crisis is financially unsustainable by Grass8989
Thats our version of owning the Cons. We welcome everyone so we claim to be morally superior. They didnt think scumbags like Abbott would then own us by sending them here.
nonlawyer t1_jber21n wrote
Reply to comment by k1lk1 in The Leaning Tower of New York City by geoxol
The Leaning Tower of Pizzarotti, I like it
iv2892 t1_jbeqk2t wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Monthly Discussion Thread - Month of March, 2023 by AutoModerator
It depends on the neighborhood, I’m in nyc often and I feel safe most of the time. The worst I usually see is maybe some homeless mumbling to himself or New Yorkers being New Yorkers. No big deal. The drivers , specially cab and Uber drivers are dangerous though , they have no regard for people crossing the streets . You’re not exaggerating on that part , is almost the same in Jersey, but since there are not that many pedestrians it doesn’t seem as bad . But we have bad drivers all over the tri state area and other cities in the US as well
iv2892 t1_jbeq9g4 wrote
Reply to comment by doodle77 in Monthly Discussion Thread - Month of March, 2023 by AutoModerator
Yeah, I mostly go to the city on the weekends and I’ve noticed there are a lot more people on the subways . Particularly the ACE and 123 lines . Oh and the 7 train as well
lillabulleroni OP t1_jbf7o86 wrote
Reply to comment by Lovis_Iovis in Interactive map of New York's street trees by lillabulleroni
Looks to me like that map is a composite of the 2015-16 Street Tree Census and the 2016-18 Park Tree inventory with 800K points--this is just the 2015-16 census.
But also, there's a Forestry Tree Points that seems to have over 1m trees. Maybe this weekend I'll update to include all of those. https://data.cityofnewyork.us/Environment/Forestry-Tree-Points/hn5i-inap/data