Recent comments in /f/nottheonion
vascop_ t1_jb048an wrote
Reply to comment by SellDonutsAtMyDoor in Insulate Britain protesters jailed for seven weeks for mentioning climate change in defence by Mighty_L_LORT
Like I said, if you ask others, they will tell you the impending doom is coming due to other reasons. AI will destroy the world, nuclear weapon proliferation, religion going out the window and the collapse of the family unit, climate change, these are all pet subjects from different people. Living in society means understanding you might be wrong. The way you feel about climate change, that the other subjects I mentioned are stupid or meaningless in comparison, that's how others might feel about your topic.
All of those might be correct to different extents, but the fact you think you're right doesn't mean an ambulance doesn't need to drive through the road you're cutting, for example. If I start cutting roads to protest the US doing drone strikes on children I'm right but I still will go to jail.
TeamRandom27 t1_jb03nds wrote
Reply to comment by vascop_ in Insulate Britain protesters jailed for seven weeks for mentioning climate change in defence by Mighty_L_LORT
I totally see what you mean but I don't really understand why it's taken into consideration for some examples and in other you aren't even allowed to mention it but I probably just don't know enough about it
SellDonutsAtMyDoor t1_jb03kat wrote
Reply to comment by vascop_ in Insulate Britain protesters jailed for seven weeks for mentioning climate change in defence by Mighty_L_LORT
If people don't protest climate crisis we won't have a society for very long...
SellDonutsAtMyDoor t1_jb03hz4 wrote
Reply to comment by vascop_ in Insulate Britain protesters jailed for seven weeks for mentioning climate change in defence by Mighty_L_LORT
Which is, in itself, an admission that the law is fundamentally intended to be ignorant or indifferent of morality in most instances, and that only high-prorile charges are afforded the consideration of moral judgement.
fruitloops043 t1_jb03cut wrote
Reply to Pa. lawmaker accused of sexual harassment says he won’t resign, will seek treatment for ‘illness’ by Responsible_Meet_528
Rep. Mike Zabel, D-Delaware County
[deleted] t1_jb02nue wrote
I was hungry AF in Europe. The portions were so small and the options were much more limited than the US.
Noticed that immediately. A few places did alright but generally speaking I remember being hungry.
I am fit with a decent appetite. Have never been overweight.
TareQ_X t1_jb02fz4 wrote
Reply to comment by Welpmart in Toronto Raptors Apologize For 'Women's History Month' Video That Applauded Women For Having Babies – OutKick by wxcode
i'm not tone deaf, but I just feel that everyone is easily offended lately, including you from what I see.
Indeed, we should also stop that offensive maternity leave, cause it's sexist and the idiot doctors said it might damage their ability to have natural healthy delivery and baby.
ButterscotchSure6589 t1_jb02faf wrote
I spent a week each in Key West and New Orleans a few years ago, ate and drank like a king, still lost weight due to the amount of walking. Although New Orleans was full of the fattest people I have seen, all wearing incredibly tight clothes. Didn't see a single lardarse in Key West.
rainer_d t1_jb00w1j wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Why so many Americans lose weight after traveling to Europe by DangerStranger138
A few villages away, people have decided to run the school lunchroom themselves.
I can’t imagine how you can hate your kids so much as to expose them to the kind of food they often get there.
TheAres1999 t1_jb00rkp wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Florida bill would require bloggers who write about governor to register with the state by realmain
Okay, I may have misread the article. I do think journalist transparency is a good thing, but can see how this can have its own set of problems
[deleted] t1_jb008c9 wrote
Reply to comment by rainer_d in Why so many Americans lose weight after traveling to Europe by DangerStranger138
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_jb002z2 wrote
Reply to comment by TheAres1999 in Florida bill would require bloggers who write about governor to register with the state by realmain
[removed]
rainer_d t1_jb000lg wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Why so many Americans lose weight after traveling to Europe by DangerStranger138
That is increasingly the case for Europe, too.
During the pandemic, a huge number of people left the hospitality industry - and they ain’t coming back.
RobsEvilTwin t1_jazzlpt wrote
This kid is an absolute bloody legend!
[deleted] t1_jazz9mv wrote
Reply to comment by Several_Emphasis_434 in 'Very brave and honest' Kentucky toddler points officers to fugitive's hiding spot by SelectiveSanity
[removed]
skaliton t1_jazyfb5 wrote
Reply to comment by definitelyjoking in Pa. lawmaker accused of sexual harassment says he won’t resign, will seek treatment for ‘illness’ by Responsible_Meet_528
I...am actually shocked. Well maybe the party will force him out.
craybest t1_jazy613 wrote
Reply to comment by Law_Student in Insulate Britain protesters jailed for seven weeks for mentioning climate change in defence by Mighty_L_LORT
How can motivation not be important in every case? This is the dumbest thing I've read. (I don't mean your opinion, but how the law works)
vascop_ t1_jazxwrx wrote
Reply to comment by TeamRandom27 in Insulate Britain protesters jailed for seven weeks for mentioning climate change in defence by Mighty_L_LORT
Motive can be inculpatory, exculpatory or meaningless depending on the case. I'm not sure how to repeat the same thing in different words. Maybe you'd like motive to always be considered, but that isn't how most countries practice law. This is particularly relevant for menial cases, most traffic offenses, etc. You cannot start going through red lights because you want to minimize your driving time to stop climate change for example.
TacoCommand t1_jazxsal wrote
Reply to comment by Zaphod_Beeblebrox_V in OJ Simpson remarks on Alex Murdaugh trial: 'I don’t know why they think I’m an expert on it' by nimobo
The hypocrisy bothers me.
TacoCommand t1_jazxpdr wrote
Reply to comment by Andagaintothegym in Daily briefing: Ancient Europeans escaped the ice age by moving to Spain by Sawe651
Splitter!
TeamRandom27 t1_jazxgxi wrote
Reply to comment by vascop_ in Insulate Britain protesters jailed for seven weeks for mentioning climate change in defence by Mighty_L_LORT
But the thing is that in many cases there are factors that change how long/if someone gets sentenced etc. I just don't really see how this would be different?
kawkz440 t1_jazxgb8 wrote
Reply to Insulate Britain protesters jailed for seven weeks for mentioning climate change in defence by Mighty_L_LORT
And here I thought US judges could be incompetent boobs.
Frogchamp_lll t1_jazxfmz wrote
AMATEUR
Frogchamp_lll t1_jazxf4a wrote
Reply to comment by muffdivemcgruff in Boy who slept in a tent for 3 years is finally coming inside by -ImYourHuckleberry-
What wife?
ShadowDragon8685 t1_jb04h42 wrote
Reply to Insulate Britain protesters jailed for seven weeks for mentioning climate change in defence by Mighty_L_LORT
This judge needs to bone up on Streisand, Barbara, Effect Thereof.
The correct response in this case, if the judge's motivation is to support the property-owner status quo, is to declare a mistrial, or whatever the English equivalent of a jury unable to reach a verdict is, and tell the prosecutor to quietly fail to file again.
Jailing them like this is only going to amplify their message. Case in point: I'm some schmuck from New Jersey and had no idea an old British woman and a British woman about my age had glued themselves to a tarmac. Now I do. I hadn't even heard of "Insulate Britain;" now I have.