Recent comments in /f/nottheonion

CascadianExpat t1_jak8soh wrote

This is why I understand why climate change skeptics don’t trust environmentalists. If someone really thinks carbon emissions are going to kill flipping everything on Earth, they wouldn’t be bitching about whether windmills interfere with caribou grazing, or whether dams interfere with salmon spawning, or whether nuclear power plants present some small risk of a meltdown. Why do you expect me to believe you when you tell me I need to get my electricity from more expensive sources or all the caribou will die, if you complain when I try to build a windmill somewhere a caribou might eat?

Edit: ITT, myopic partisans proving my point. Thanks, y’all, you’ve managed to further reduce my faith in humanity.

0

kensingtonGore t1_jak55ji wrote

This interview is fairly recent, and breaks it down in Fravors own words, which is nice.

But there's also this forensic analysis, it goes deep into the velocities and g forces reported, and covers the sensors used. The fact that the UAP were detected on multiple platforms, over multiple days from multiple credible witnesses is why I think that event cluster is the gold standard for study.

It's not enough to be conclusive, but that's because I think we struggle to record it. Still deserves a closer look I think

1

kensingtonGore t1_jak3sfo wrote

So there are a ton of rabbit holes, hoaxes and bullshitters in the ufo world.

To cut through all of the chaff, I have been using the same criteria as the pentagons office to decide what is actually unexplained, what is prosaic.

One of the criteria is low observability, which as you say - concealing themselves would make sense if they are here to survey.

0