If we're gonna qualify a fetus as a person, let's go all in. Also add carpool lanes, life insurance, and child support.

That would be why he stole the electricity instead of paying for it.

I said I’d tag her 🤷🏻‍♂️ clear you know you in the wrong buddy, I’m offering proof and you’re looking like a clown. Stay chronically online buddy

Why don't you tag your Canadian girlfriend while you're at it?

Implied, but didn’t give any proof of such and second, so what? Art shouldn’t be put away, just because some people find it offensive.

I said I’d tag her if you want but it’s obvious you know you look like a clown now

Please note this is Israel Jewish people specifically and it would be about as misleading as a headline saying Christians are upset that a hospital said Nazis are bad when it's talking about Russian Christians

Them feeling victimized has nothing to do with the fact that they're Jewish and everything to do with the fact that they are Israeli colonizers who want to erase the history of the country they are trying to take over

[removed]

Not a single country. Good luck surviving saying anything remotely negative about Ukraine, even if it is in a pro-Ukraine context.

The entire conceit of the victimization is that one group of people has the inalienable right to their own religious ethnostate. Palestinian is not a religion or an ethnicity- there are Jewish, Muslim and Christian Palestinians who have all been equally affected by that conceit. The Temple Mount has always been a shared religious icon. I will never understand the position.

So to be clear

You think pregnant women

Trap

Their baby’s?

You better be mentally I’ll and not a idiot

Shrek, loudly proclaiming that you totally have a trans friend who approves of your bigoted bullshit and doing it over and over again isn't convincing anyone, and it never will.

Sounds a lot like "it's a person when we want it to be, and it isn't a person when we want it to be"

Dude she literally is, how come a trans person has to behave exactly a particular way or else you don’t think they exist, but transphobic. Also clearly not about the karma if you online chronically enough to rack that much up 😂 she literally is though you fucking moron, I could tag the insta if you want

Nicole isn't a real person, and nobody cares about my karma except you.

I support a woman's right to abort her parasite whenever the fuck SHE wants. I don't give a fuck if she wants to flush a clump of cells down the toilet or not.

Tell me again how you know about me 🤡

You don't grasp the concept of what objectivity is. If it was only about a woman's bodily autonomy, then abortion would be totally fine, until after birth. So you are objectively wrong, if you don't support late term abortions. A woman is unique in that she can have a body with its own autonomy inside of her own body with autonomy. You won't argue in good faith, just like the others you hate, which only serves to further prove my point of why I find it difficult to engage this subject, as everyone is using feelings, instead of facts.

You sound like someone trying to use the clothing of a rape victim as justification

Umm, because it's not born yet, you moron.

Didn't know a bloke calling himself a fireman was a negative attitude, thank goodness this mental colossus is here to put us right. Wouldn't want to be rescued by someone not fully with it.

No, the State of Florida's government didn't think it through. This lawyer is doing a great job.

It's literally this simple: If the fetus is a human being, it gets the rights of said human beings and that INCLUDES not being detained in a prison. Since the mother is there, the fetus, with the rights granted to it by the State of Florida, is currently illegally detained as it has committed no crime.

If it's not a human being and doesn't have those rights, then the laws passed by the State of Florida are invalid.

> The child is effectively on temporary lifesupport, unable to express agency, and is currently a ward of the state.

> Keeping the baby in the mother is the best care they can provide, anything else would actively endanger the child. Where the mother is makes no tangible difference in this case.

So you agree the mother is then being forcibly used to keep another person alive, until such time the other person no longer requires life support. Which is illegal. Hmmm.

Because the article has nothing to do with abortion.

unfortunately he was elected, so it's hard to fire george santos

Could be a spectrum?