The whole point of the pro-life movement is that fetuses have rights. This lawsuit is showing the logical result when that stance is encoded into law. If the fetus has the same rights as any other person, then they get all the rights not some stupid selective bullshit.

It is a question that has been deliberately and consistently avoided, as you do.

Yes or no, does a woman's bodily autonomy trump the right of the child at 10 minutes before birth?

If one of a pair of twins has been delivered, can the mother morally demand an abortion of the second twin?

You refuse to answer the question because the chain of logic means you have to look back to decide when it is OK to end the life.

It is not some gotcha question.

[deleted]

>Yes fantastical wishful thinking but that's not how it is, which is why it's so fucked up that Republicans pretend mothers should only have the rights of a vessel rather than a human being.

If i am 10 minutes from giving birth, do i have the right to have someone reach in there and kill the t-10 minutes from being a born baby child?

>So you support having a choice about your own capability of having a child... "Prior to" what exactly? Where do you feel your own rights as a human being end?

I support reproductive rights. I support abortion rights up to 12 weeks. At which point it is not just your rights in the equation. You accepted a dependent.

If you go three months without resolving the issue, you made a choice. no matter how hard a choice it was.

>Do you support other human beings having a choice, or do you demand they make the same choice you would?

If i didn't want a child, i would get an abortion before the moral issue even came up. I would have had 3 months to make that choice.

Past that, it is a question of me claiming the right to end a life that i, regardless of the situation, through neglect or indecision put in the position. I don't think i should have that right in a temporary situation. Kid never did anything wrong.

I agree that under the current theory that a foetus has rights, it is required to endure poor nutrition and an unfavourable environment for growth.

The rights of the foetus were never really at issue, but the right wing sure does love their cruelty.

It had to do with control over women.

But since fetuses are persons in Florida, it's a violation of their rights.

mfw “palestine”

Yes, how about that? I never knew those existed until I went to Europe. Totally something the US needs! Why don’t we have full walls and doors on public bathrooms ??

Illegally detained… by the woman.

+20 years to sentence

>Will they decide to free all convicted pregnant women as not to violate the constitutional rights of the fetus inside of them?

Who said they have constitutional rights? Those aren't granted until you're born on US soil.

gun should be implanted before birth dont be liberal

You can't have it both ways; some people believe it to be a person. I must set the prisoner free.

There are legal professionals who predicted that these cases would arise after foetal personhood legislation was passed.

In addition, should the infant's right to own a gun be restricted because it is not a criminal and is being imprisoned without legal authority? No! The newborn should have access to a firearm!

Because we love LAMF. Don't you love LAMF? Tell me, what do you think of LAMF?

This comment is an average redditor moment

Not according to Florida.

I’m gonna use that on my date tonight

[deleted]

If a mother was lost on a deserted island, she had what she needed to feed her self and her child. Would you find it acceptable for her to just leave her helpless kid alone, knowing it would starve?

Yes, parents can speak on behalf of the child, but to advance it's health and wellbeing, not to advocate it's detriment and demise.

We would never accept a mother deliberately ending the life of a toddler in her care if no adoption services were available.

The baby or even a fetus past a certain point of development in her womb is in her care, she has a responsibility to ensure it's safety and wellbeing. She is it's caretaker when there are no alternative caretakers to take over.

It's not like Israel as been electing angels every year. They literally keep electing the most right wing factions possible in their Government. The only difference between Hamas and the far right government that Netanyahu governs is that the latter has nukes and one of the most well armed terrorists on the planet they call the IDF, while the Palestinian terrorists are armed with firecrackers.

pristine

[deleted]

Seems to be a center-right Canadian who likes 3d printing and wants New Brunswick and Nova Scotia to die a painful death

Let's waste $18,000 in taxpayer money to operate a mining operation in the fricking crawlspace of a middle school

Hmm, that might suggest the later, but I have seen ancaps convincing themselves that today's capitalism isn't capitalism and post on antiwork so you never know.