ah yes, I remember a few years ago #savetheupskirt and a crowd picketing outside Scotland Yard to "free upstart Johnny!" popular support like I'd never seen before.

They are required by law to hold some in reserve for emergencies and redirections.

I think an investigation was launched when a drone caused a significant number of flights to redirect from Gatwick London, to Heathrow London and some aircraft skipped the holding queue due to running low on reserves.

Because a significant number had to divert they had to divert and wait in a holding pattern.

I don't think anyone broke the rules but I think some changes were made as those who ran the lowest fuel (to save weight and cost) also ended up with priority landing.

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/20/london-gatwick-airport-grounds-flights-due-to-drone-intrusion.html

I don't think anyone broke the rules but changes were made at the airport to redirect further away sooner rather than using waiting patterns.

This article's video isn't loading for me which is a shame.

TLDR; they have to have some spare in case of stuff.

Yeah, even the most reprehensible criminals have rights. And when a judge finds the word of a dog thief more credible than that of two cops, it's time to fire those cops.

Being homeless (and the look on his face in the mugshot), my guess is he is regularly steamrolled by the system.

Mighty deep hole they're digging themselves

My husband would've been dead years ago already.

Dude fuck your self righteous attitude

I don’t know where anyone would have gotten the idea he was hurt by upstanding members of the community. Why, the old lady expressed surprise he wasn’t dead, considering he was clearly lost.

Airlines plan for at least 45 min of reserve fuel on top of the fuel it takes to start engines and taxi to runway at origin airport, fly to destination, and hold for 30 min above destination airport.

Yeah. There's precedent too since the cops seem to always be arresting people that suddenly have a lot of injuries/death inexplicably on them.

If I was an alien species I would stay as far away from earth as possible. What kind of barbaric species commends the killing of a young man has heroic? Not one that I would want to associate with.

Giving ”bruh” a face.

She looks like a fucking turnip

Neighbors assisted suspect gently to the ground with minimal amount of force needed to control the situation.

Unfortunately due to suspects continued combative behavior and resistance, serious injuries were sustained despite citizens efforts to avoid such.

Afterwords the citizens effecting the arrest promptly sought medical attention for the patient.

Maybe cops shouldn't be slapping people in hospitals.

Stories like this always come to mind when I read articles about how prosecutors don't prosecute "minor crimes" because they are "too understaffed" or "underfunded". Or when I read articles about how the police don't bother pursuing things like package theft or home break-ins where the items stolen don't exceed a certain amount for the same reasons.

Part of me thinks it's a load of crap and they're just lazy

Right, kids these days are very clumsy. He was probably trying to help the lady get into her car when he fell several times. Others came to assist him and, realizing he had hurt himself, called him an ambulance.

It's like that guy leaving a best buy and fell off the curb. Luckily a few marines where there to help him.

And this, my friends, is why you should never forget your wedding anniversary.

The beating will continue until you love me.

Yeah, the crime here is voyeurism, not using the toilet.

If I needed to go explosively and the men's was occupied, better believe I'd barge into a stall in the women's.

I was so confused by the headline as well. Like he’s just a normal looking person, so why are people hanging up pictures of his face in the stalls? (Especially when I’d never really seen ANYONE’s face displayed in the ladies’ room). And who is going to police this new rule?

Voyeurism is not the same as rape. There's gotta be some damned proportionality to legal consequences.

Putting a sign on the door that says "Women" doesn't have any actual laws and regs behind it.

In fact, I always try to use women's restrooms myself if they're single occupancy obviously... I don't go into big ones with stalls. Why single occupancy ones, though? Because the chances that there will be piss on the ceiling, walls, seat and floor go down slightly vs men's public restrooms, where all that is guaranteed.

In this case, the issue is that the guy is a voyeuristic perv lowlife and thus banned from being exactly that.

Some dude just read this, mad as hell and hung like a hamster, and he's about to go jump into a vat of toxic chemicals. Sad villain origins.

[removed]