Recent comments in /f/nottheonion

bbkknn t1_j9jdwol wrote

Scapegoat. But the whole thing is surreal.

The trains weren't build, they noticed the wrong measurements in the early design stage. This happened two or three years ago and the design was stopped for a long time because it's a legal problem.

Before 2015, when this particular rail system needed new machines they would state in the contract that the new machines must have the same dimensions than the old ones. In 2015 a new safety standard came out establishing new dimensions for the machines and wagons. What nobody took into account is that there are some really old tunnels which are smaller than the dimensions in the new safety standard.

The safety standard had to be changed to allow for exceptions on how the machine dimensions are established and this took forever. But as said, no train was build.

In a few months there are regional elections and so this year old problem nobody ever heard about suddenly has become a big talking point to bash on the government.

17

Phorensick t1_j9jc6vq wrote

Agreed it has zero to do with trains…it’s about more clicks to link other Guardian stories.

But since I was confused as well…here’s the quick summary of what they referenced:

The left and the right are bashing each other because the government passed a well meaning law that had some very unintended consequences…

“Under the new law, consent must be given and cannot be assumed to have been given either by default or with silence. The legislation also removes the distinction between sexual abuse and sexual assault – i.e. rape – by making consent the deciding factor.

[and this is the part that wasn’t completely thought through…]

The new legislation has allowed convicted sex offenders to have their sentences reexamined. On Wednesday alone, Spanish media reported that 13 sentences had been reduced in several different regions, and that three convicted sex abusers had actually been released as a result. One of the cases involved a man in León who had abused his 11-year-old daughter. Judges ruled that instead of ‘sexual abuse of minors’ he had in fact committed ‘sexual assault of minors’, which carries a six- to 12-year sentence compared to the original eight to 12.

Under Spanish law, any change to the minimum sentence for an offence can be applied retroactively, and judges usually rule in favour of the convict in such cases. That means that where the minimum sentence for a sexual offence has been reduced, a person serving time for the same offense can expect to spend fewer years in prison or even be released on time served.”

https://www.theolivepress.es/spain-news/2022/11/19/explainer-why-spains-only-yes-means-yes-consent-law-is-seeing-convicted-sex-abusers-freed-from-jail/amp/

5

wallander1983 t1_j9j4heq wrote

My highlights from the article:

Eastman has long attracted controversy in the state Capitol. He was censured in 2017 after claiming that women in rural villages try to get pregnant so they can get a free trip to the city for an abortion.

No, i am shocked. Shocked.

Seasoned lawmakers said he has alienated every caucus he has joined with his uncompromising approach to legislation and his tendency to use his newsletters to bully his GOP colleagues.

I hope he has no partner and no children, classic abuser behavior.

Eastman himself did not respond to a request for an interview. In a text message, he said, "I was happy to hear that ACT is taking a stand against child abuse, but the value of a child is not derived from their future productivity, but from the fact that every child is made in the image of God."

Understood, he's an Ultra-Christian Right-Winger.

Gray said Eastman has "boldly shown who he is," pointing out that he has solidly won four consecutive elections.

He may be a Far-Right Ultra-Christian Oath Keeper who is shunned even by his GOP colleagues, but he is one of US.

80