Recent comments in /f/nottheonion
imafraidofmuricans t1_j9esbkz wrote
Reply to comment by SilasX in UK tax authority nudges net 'influencers': You may owe us for those OnlyFans feet pics by james8475
So.. why weren't they mass-reporting crypto bros? A group that make a ton of shady income and famously hates the government and taxes?
Since you so sincerely believe it was done as justice.
Like.. they did it with the express purpose to harass people they hate, entirely based on the assumption that "dumb women" wouldn't understand that you have to declare income. Literally nothing came of it, either, besides some people's lives being made needlessly stressful. Because, surprise, women are perfectly capable of declaring their taxes. Even if they get naked on camera.
[deleted] t1_j9ervka wrote
Reply to comment by ZhugeSimp in UK tax authority nudges net 'influencers': You may owe us for those OnlyFans feet pics by james8475
[removed]
imafraidofmuricans t1_j9ern7i wrote
Reply to comment by ZhugeSimp in UK tax authority nudges net 'influencers': You may owe us for those OnlyFans feet pics by james8475
Why are you going on the base assumption that they don't pay taxes? I mean I know why, "lol dumb women" is the first thought in your head when you wake up every day, but don't you think flooding a government office with thousands of entirely unbased accusations might be a bit fucking stupid?
MrBeastiemon t1_j9ep0rg wrote
Reply to Gritting routes are ‘sexist’ says Cambridgeshire highways chief and ‘must change’ by Bald__egg
wasn't this already tried? Like I'm sure one of the scandivian countries attempted a switch towards gritting routes towards schools and daycares (since it was typically women who were ferrying children about) from the old main thoroughfare and workplace focused routes.
iirc what happened was it worked great in a trial in a small city and when there was a second trial in a bigger city it was absolute havoc because nobody could get anywhere. The only reason it worked in the smaller city was because the routes for schools and primary thoroughfares were mostly the same whereas in the bigger city they weren't. In the end the idea got scrapped i think.
can't remember much about it and I can't find any sources so idk if this was even real but maybe someone else can chime in with some details on it
OrdinaryImpress3422 t1_j9eo5m9 wrote
Watch South Park season 26, Episode 2. Victims everywhere.
chazwomaq t1_j9enwtt wrote
Reply to comment by blahbleh112233 in Gritting routes are ‘sexist’ says Cambridgeshire highways chief and ‘must change’ by Bald__egg
Someone should invent a kind of material you can place around your body to make you a little warmer. Until that distant day, I guess women have to remain forever cold in the office.
/s
malikearnest t1_j9em7k7 wrote
Reply to San Diego police attempt to lure man off Mission Valley Mall roof with McDonald's by sdgoat
10/10 one of the more interesting stories I've written. Thanks for sharing!
kindsoberfullydressd t1_j9em18i wrote
Reply to comment by Individual-Schemes in Gritting routes are ‘sexist’ says Cambridgeshire highways chief and ‘must change’ by Bald__egg
They prioritise routes used for commuting over smaller rural roads, which seems sensible, but actually isn’t.
This article explains it better than I can.
Individual-Schemes t1_j9elgoe wrote
Reply to comment by AdventurerLikeU in Gritting routes are ‘sexist’ says Cambridgeshire highways chief and ‘must change’ by Bald__egg
>Okay?? That doesn’t really change my point
You don't have to change your point. Again: people used more toilet paper during the pandemic because they were home.
Women don't use baby formula.
See how my point didn't change either? You're really going to a lot of effort to argue about something so dumb. You can't just admit that people use toilet paper.
goliathfasa t1_j9ej1bb wrote
Reply to Gritting routes are ‘sexist’ says Cambridgeshire highways chief and ‘must change’ by Bald__egg
I don’t like stereotyping, but that looks exactly like the kind of person who would say some shit like that.
AdventurerLikeU t1_j9eiaux wrote
Reply to comment by Individual-Schemes in Gritting routes are ‘sexist’ says Cambridgeshire highways chief and ‘must change’ by Bald__egg
Okay?? That doesn’t really change my point - which was that although obviously everyone uses toilet paper, women use it more. Because, again: men (and boys) don’t tend to use toilet paper for when they pee, just when they poo. Women (and girls) use it for peeing, pooing, vaginal discharge and periods - relevant because (IIRC) girls can get their period as early as around eight (though it’s usually between 12-15).
Also, considering women use the bathroom more frequently than men I still think it’s safe to say people with vaginas use more toilet paper than people with penises. Because, you know. That‘s just how math works.
> stop the sexist narrative that women use formula
I’m guessing you mean “that women use formula more than men”, but that’s not sexist - it’s just plain accurate. It’s not a judgment on how involved dads are - it’s just an acknowledgement of feeding habits as influenced by aspects of society (specifically maternity and paternity leave).
Maternity leave is often longer than paternity leave (if it even exists). So women are by that very fact more likely to be feeding the baby, simply because they spend more time with the baby during that maternity leave. According to the International Labour Organisation, 98 countries meet the ILO standard of at least 14 weeks maternity leave and 107 countries finance maternity leave cash benefits through social security. Compared with paternity leave, which is found in 78 countries, and only five of those countries provide paternity leave for more than two weeks. So of the percentage of babies who receive formula milk alongside or instead of breast milk, there’s a fairly good chance that - at least in a heteronormative household with a father and a mother - the mother is doing more feeding and so using formula more than the father.
Individual-Schemes t1_j9ehqfx wrote
Reply to comment by AdventurerLikeU in Gritting routes are ‘sexist’ says Cambridgeshire highways chief and ‘must change’ by Bald__egg
Do you not know that whole families, who used to go to work and school, were staying home during the pandemic? So rather than using toilet paper at work/school, households were required to have a greater supply. Do you understand that? It has very little to do with what type of genitals you're wiping.
And stop the sexist narrative that women use baby formula. What fucking year do you think this is?
Individual-Schemes t1_j9eh46k wrote
Reply to comment by BaddestReligion in Gritting routes are ‘sexist’ says Cambridgeshire highways chief and ‘must change’ by Bald__egg
And why could that be an argument for being sexist?
[deleted] t1_j9egk3m wrote
Reply to comment by goochisdrunk in Gritting routes are ‘sexist’ says Cambridgeshire highways chief and ‘must change’ by Bald__egg
[deleted]
otirk t1_j9eg2ka wrote
Reply to comment by Trap_Cubicle5000 in Gritting routes are ‘sexist’ says Cambridgeshire highways chief and ‘must change’ by Bald__egg
He basically says that more men (drive to) work than women, but calls others sexist.
Weazelfish t1_j9ee7er wrote
Reply to comment by Busy-Okra-7732 in Gritting routes are ‘sexist’ says Cambridgeshire highways chief and ‘must change’ by Bald__egg
Maybe it's short on a historical timeline, but I am so tired of the knee-jerk 'but I don't hate anybody' reaction
west0ne t1_j9ec9w2 wrote
Reply to comment by capGpriv in Gritting routes are ‘sexist’ says Cambridgeshire highways chief and ‘must change’ by Bald__egg
Exactly, and because most deliveries are by road they also keep the shelves stocked.
capGpriv t1_j9eao42 wrote
Reply to Gritting routes are ‘sexist’ says Cambridgeshire highways chief and ‘must change’ by Bald__egg
Makes a £300k cut, Tries to hide it by giving a “reserve” (can’t keep equipment on a reserve), then distracts by claiming gritting is sexist
Statistically women are significantly worse effected by icy footpaths, but prioritising footpaths over major service roads is idiotic
capGpriv t1_j9e9yf4 wrote
Reply to comment by west0ne in Gritting routes are ‘sexist’ says Cambridgeshire highways chief and ‘must change’ by Bald__egg
It should be noted those mains roads are also essential for emergency services, not focusing on them would prevent ambulances reaching anyone whose had an accident
Deckard2022 t1_j9e9vs8 wrote
Reply to Gritting routes are ‘sexist’ says Cambridgeshire highways chief and ‘must change’ by Bald__egg
What he’s saying is some wives don’t like their husbands going up the gritter.
repeat4EMPHASIS t1_j9e7lkd wrote
Reply to comment by neihuffda in Gritting routes are ‘sexist’ says Cambridgeshire highways chief and ‘must change’ by Bald__egg
That's the nicest thing someone has said this week haha
neihuffda t1_j9e779o wrote
Reply to comment by repeat4EMPHASIS in Gritting routes are ‘sexist’ says Cambridgeshire highways chief and ‘must change’ by Bald__egg
But that's the annoying thing, we've just invented the need to wear suits to be a worthy human. No suit, no skills. I'm really glad that my job doesn't require such nonsense. I get that you alone can't turn up to work with bermuda shorts and your favorite band t-shirt, but I wish you could.
SilasX t1_j9e6s8t wrote
Reply to comment by DankVectorz in Gritting routes are ‘sexist’ says Cambridgeshire highways chief and ‘must change’ by Bald__egg
Like KFC?
Rowmyownboat t1_j9e64u3 wrote
Reply to Gritting routes are ‘sexist’ says Cambridgeshire highways chief and ‘must change’ by Bald__egg
Don’t working mothers and wives commute then?
Pyranze t1_j9etk5u wrote
Reply to comment by kindsoberfullydressd in Gritting routes are ‘sexist’ says Cambridgeshire highways chief and ‘must change’ by Bald__egg
TL;DR: most accidents that result from snow actually occur on pavements and cycle paths (not necessarily "rural" roads), which are disproportionately used by women.