Recent comments in /f/nottheonion
peeping_somnambulist t1_j9e2ugc wrote
Reply to comment by namezam in Gritting routes are ‘sexist’ says Cambridgeshire highways chief and ‘must change’ by Bald__egg
Don't nobody want that white people fried chicken anyway.
ga-co t1_j9e1wdp wrote
Reply to comment by TimeTravelMishap in UK tax authority nudges net 'influencers': You may owe us for those OnlyFans feet pics by james8475
You want a toe? I can get you a toe, believe me. There are ways, Dude.
repeat4EMPHASIS t1_j9e1aq3 wrote
Reply to comment by Spire_Citron in Gritting routes are ‘sexist’ says Cambridgeshire highways chief and ‘must change’ by Bald__egg
Good thing I wasn't talking about suits in that example because it was all women. You didn't even read the comment before responding.
west0ne t1_j9e0zju wrote
Reply to comment by Trap_Cubicle5000 in Gritting routes are ‘sexist’ says Cambridgeshire highways chief and ‘must change’ by Bald__egg
Most deliveries are made by road, emergency vehicles travel on the road, busses travel on the road. As much as people may not like it, for the time being roads are essential infrastructure.
Whilst it may be a fact that more men drive than women the main reason for treating roads is to keep essential services operational. In many areas only major roads and key transport routes are treated with the estate roads being left untreated.
west0ne t1_j9e0jwd wrote
Reply to comment by marsumane in Gritting routes are ‘sexist’ says Cambridgeshire highways chief and ‘must change’ by Bald__egg
In our area they treat the main roads first and then move onto the major bus routes, everything else is left untreated and footpaths are never touched. I think that keeping main transport, and in particular public transport routes open makes sense.
Spire_Citron t1_j9e0ik8 wrote
Reply to comment by repeat4EMPHASIS in Gritting routes are ‘sexist’ says Cambridgeshire highways chief and ‘must change’ by Bald__egg
A cardigan still isn't nearly as warm as a full suit.
Spire_Citron t1_j9e0g2g wrote
Reply to comment by repeat4EMPHASIS in Gritting routes are ‘sexist’ says Cambridgeshire highways chief and ‘must change’ by Bald__egg
Well, consider this. The dress code for men is a full suit. What falls into the dress code for women that's ever warmer than that? Women are expected to dress in ways that aren't as warm. The dress codes are what's ridiculous.
SilasX t1_j9dzxyl wrote
Reply to comment by bloodmonarch in UK tax authority nudges net 'influencers': You may owe us for those OnlyFans feet pics by james8475
Then why is the UK behind on it, when it’s a country that normally makes taxes easy? How did this story happen in the first place?
Oh right you just wanted to circlejerk about USA bad, but catching tax cheats is bad too, but only if you like them, and of course the tax system should have been set up to catch them faster 🙄 Ah, mental gymnastics.
Also, not everyone who cams does it through a big central employer/site. But everyone seems to always assume it’s some easily taxable entity like that.
bloodmonarch t1_j9dzhgg wrote
Reply to comment by sanjsrik in San Diego police attempt to lure man off Mission Valley Mall roof with McDonald's by sdgoat
Did it work?
bloodmonarch t1_j9dzefy wrote
Reply to comment by SilasX in UK tax authority nudges net 'influencers': You may owe us for those OnlyFans feet pics by james8475
Camming self employment is the easiest one to regulate since there'a only like max 5 of the biggest camsites out there or OF. You just have to force those sites/parent company to automatically link the income to the individuals' tax/income data.
This also works similarly to gig drivers like UBER/GRAB. make it so that the parent company reports the number.
The problem is always that USA is way behind on tax reporting online infrastructure/platform where income data is aggregated.
The kind of self-employment that is difficult to track the total income is that if you are running your own business as an employer, or if you are small-medium sized landlords.
Clutteredmind275 t1_j9dz65w wrote
Reply to comment by juliuspepperwoodchi in Gritting routes are ‘sexist’ says Cambridgeshire highways chief and ‘must change’ by Bald__egg
It’s called systemic racism for a reason right? Get to do racist things and then say “oh no it’s not racist, it’s just that’s what the system says is best. We’re just trying to be efficient guys! Honest!”
SilasX t1_j9dyqgl wrote
Reply to comment by bloodmonarch in UK tax authority nudges net 'influencers': You may owe us for those OnlyFans feet pics by james8475
No tax system automatically finds all self employment income like camming and collects the expenses for you. Even in countries with user-friendly tax system, there’s some work to do for the taxpayer in those cases. Hence this story about the UK! (Which is one of the user-friendly systems you probably consider fixed!)
It’s completely fair to criticize the US for requiring more scavenger hunt than necessary, but some forms of income inherently require some effort to file and may be missed if not reported by others. Camming self-employment is one of them.
ThisOneSmartIdiot t1_j9dyfhw wrote
Reply to comment by NoMoreBeGrieved in Gritting routes are ‘sexist’ says Cambridgeshire highways chief and ‘must change’ by Bald__egg
False. In San Diego and Inperial Counties I have seen them spray some sort of liquid deicer. May or may not be salt, but when it dries it certainly looks like salt.
bloodmonarch t1_j9dyc8v wrote
Reply to comment by SilasX in UK tax authority nudges net 'influencers': You may owe us for those OnlyFans feet pics by james8475
Maybe fix your tax system lmao. You paid your tax so that you had to get your fellow citizens to report on each other for tax irregularities.
And plus there's a huge assumption that online personalities aren't paying their taxes which we simply don't know if its true or otherwise.
And lol, i gladly pay my tax since its all automated and hassle free. Pay with just a click on the tax website tyvm.
SilasX t1_j9dy0a6 wrote
Reply to comment by bloodmonarch in UK tax authority nudges net 'influencers': You may owe us for those OnlyFans feet pics by james8475
No shit nobody likes being investigated for tax evasion! That’s kind of an obvious point to make! But our tax system depends on unreported income getting called out somehow. And like I said in the other comment, if an entire source of income is allegedly not being reported at all, that’s trivial for the IRS to rule out if the person is filing it somehow.
Yes, congrats, welcome to the world of not liking to pay taxes, hope you enjoy your first job!
bloodmonarch t1_j9dwytf wrote
Reply to comment by SilasX in UK tax authority nudges net 'influencers': You may owe us for those OnlyFans feet pics by james8475
Well yeah, but the point is would you appreviate random people tipping the taxmen randomly in hope of catching you for tax evasion?
Tax evasion is bad, but this feels more like Salem witch hunt to me.
SilasX t1_j9dwk92 wrote
Reply to comment by bloodmonarch in UK tax authority nudges net 'influencers': You may owe us for those OnlyFans feet pics by james8475
Making money in a way that doesn’t automatically get get tracked for taxes then. 🙄
[deleted] t1_j9dwivy wrote
Reply to Gritting routes are ‘sexist’ says Cambridgeshire highways chief and ‘must change’ by Bald__egg
[removed]
bloodmonarch t1_j9dwfl5 wrote
Reply to comment by SilasX in UK tax authority nudges net 'influencers': You may owe us for those OnlyFans feet pics by james8475
?? If you are working somewhere the customer literally sees you making money. Even if you are not customer facing, anyone can literally assume you are earning money at your place of employment.
SilasX t1_j9dw1eb wrote
Reply to comment by bloodmonarch in UK tax authority nudges net 'influencers': You may owe us for those OnlyFans feet pics by james8475
Because they don’t observe me making money.
bloodmonarch t1_j9dvbcq wrote
Reply to comment by SilasX in UK tax authority nudges net 'influencers': You may owe us for those OnlyFans feet pics by james8475
You dont have randoms on the street or your customers reporting you for your tax details though
SilasX t1_j9dqcsk wrote
Reply to comment by Spire_Citron in UK tax authority nudges net 'influencers': You may owe us for those OnlyFans feet pics by james8475
If they’re not cheating on their taxes, it’s pretty easy to rule them out without them knowing. “Oh yep, that’s this person. Oh, yep, self employment income from modeling on their last 1040, probably not hiding anything.”
3woodx t1_j9dqbkx wrote
The dude is either hung like a horse or a little field mouse. Back to the fire mate, not your balls. 🔥
SilasX t1_j9dq5h1 wrote
Reply to comment by ZhugeSimp in UK tax authority nudges net 'influencers': You may owe us for those OnlyFans feet pics by james8475
“No, that’s evil, when people I like have to deal with the same tax penalties as everyone else!”
bloodmonarch t1_j9e3vkj wrote
Reply to comment by SilasX in UK tax authority nudges net 'influencers': You may owe us for those OnlyFans feet pics by james8475
Well, you WERE talking about the USA earlier. But my point still stand. I am not so sure how easy it was in UK, but i know of indie game dev in German who says its easy to report taxes as independent entity.
You can try to twist the talking point however you want, but this ia a problem you can easily solve if you want to solve it.
Besides small sites does not even generate enough traffics/ revenue/profits on the individual basis to even worth caring about ( i mean if you want to be principled and nickle and dime people for 5 bucks a year, sure??? I guess)