Recent comments in /f/nottheonion

chrissydvd t1_j913kh2 wrote

Murdoch knows how to keep those ratings up..doesn’t have to be a truth, a crazy news blip is fine. Oh for the days of News of The World (ceased publishing in 2011) where printed rubbish was slurped up with gusto. Why did anyone think Fox was about actual News or truth..sheesh🥴🥴

1

Blue_foot t1_j912kpy wrote

You CAN survive being internally decapitated!

It means the spinal column and brain are physically separated on the inside. Your head is still attached. It doesn’t sound fun.

But it doesn’t give one super powers.

https://www.newsweek.com/what-internal-decapitation-man-makes-miracle-recovery-after-surviving-crash-1053681

2

Crizbibble t1_j910lme wrote

I have no idea tbh and haven’t given it any thought whatsoever. All I’m saying is this law was being made to exclude certain private data from law enforcement and that doesn’t seem like a good idea. If they file the proper paperwork to get a warrant for information related to a criminal investigation it should be honor just like everyone else’s data. The only use case I can think of off the top of my head would be something related to a pregnancy or to impeach a persons testimony related to menstruation. As I’m not a woman I am really limited in coming up with things I do not completely understand.

−9

Crizbibble t1_j90yz58 wrote

Honestly this is a small government thing to do. The bill would of excluded in particular app data related to women’s menstruation. That is an additional process and not limiting a process. I hate republicans too but this law was going to make certain data unobtainable by law enforcement for whatever reason and I am sure they’re reasons you may need this data in a criminal investigation. In conclusion if this law was passed women would be treated as a special class and their menstruation data excluded from criminal investigations. That doesn’t seem like a good law.

−9