The sausage king of Chicago?

Charitable donations are requested in lieu of hot or sweet peppers.

Don't we still have Abe Froman?

[removed]

His last request was not to be cremated, but to be slowly roasted in his own juices.

Family members have not stated if Mr. Zucchero will be buried “dry,” “dipped” or “wet".

[deleted]

After many years we are finally narrowing the answer to the question Where’s the beef?

Sweden and Denmark. I can't find statistic on Belgium's prison violence or gangs, is it comparable to the US?

[deleted]

You know Belgium is basically the European cocaine import capitol, right?

I imagine prison isn’t exactly fun there with the various drug cartels interned.

What version of europe is your sentiment operating off of?

I want to stitch this on a damn pillow.

Garland already handed over any investigation, it would be inappropriate for him to now personally investigate Trump.

This is entirely pointless politics and just proves Garland isn't doing his job other than being completely useless.

War Crimes have nothing to do with Garland. He won't even prosecute Russia's stooge, who the hell believes Garland gives a shit about war crimes?

What the hell is our AG doing there? He has 0 fucking foreign affairs authority. Can't be arsed to prosecute traitors but the dumbass can play international politics?

Garland needs removed as AG, shit is stupid as fuck.

Racists and bigots

[removed]

[removed]

[removed]

[removed]

[removed]

To be fair, the legislature can override the Supreme Court in every parliamentary system; if there’s no constitution preserving power for the Supreme Court (like in the US) then legislatures can always restrict the courts’ powers. For example, nothing is stopping Britain’s parliament from dissolving their supreme court, and unlike Israel the British high court has no power to overrule parliamentary legislation for any reason.

What makes the US system unique is that it is uniquely counter-majoritarian. The constitution giving SCOTUS its status as a co-equal branch of government cannot be amended unless 2/3 of congress (or 2/3s of states) propose an amendment, and then 3/4ths of all 50 state legislatures ratify it. That means theoretically 90% of the population could support abolishing or reforming the Supreme Court and if even just 13 of the smallest-population states oppose ratification then nothing happens.

Big surprise, a politician turns out to be a piece of shit...

Why bother with investigative journalism when you can just have your reporter/AI vomit out some basic bullshit information instead? It might earn them the same amount of clicks either way, and it costs a lot less. In a way I think it’s partly down to people not valuing that kind of journalism enough to pay for it. If we leave them to resort to click-baiting to generate revenue, this is about the quality of journalism I think we can expect from them.

[removed]