The usual routine: make claim, say video supports claim, video shows a well worn aspect no one was questioning or denying while ignoring the actual key part of the claim being made.

Is it possible? Sure. Was that proof of blackmail related to Hunter? Obviously not.

Also, it’s a small detail but anyone familiar with colloquial use of the English language would understand “well son of a bitch” was being used as “well what do you know” and not calling Poroshenko an SOB. Only serves to illustrate a clear bias or willful dishonesty.

It's because of something called appeals. The US is not China where once a death sentence is handed out, it actually happens within the same month. Do you want the US to be as liberal with the death penalty application as China? Because that's the only way the death penalty becomes cheaper.

Supposedly to discuss Russian war crimes but I think most likely to get first hand information about Trump's conduct collaborating with Russia against Ukraine.

[removed]

Sorry reporters, but there’s always a single person who is responsible for a business or corporate action - it’s not the admin who updated the spreadsheet, it’s whoever is in charge of the company, the department, the branch of government, etc. you want to make a difference? You better start naming them. Let them try to explain it away themselves instead of painting a “well there’s nothing we can do about it” scenario right from the jump. That just makes you complicit.

Which women’s prison are you referring to?

Fucking where does this happen?

Read the article, this is just standard political grandstanding from the republicans.

[removed]

you know if European countries really want to punish a shitty inmate, American privately owned prisons could take them for a fee, and the European inmate could expirience the alien life of race politics, where their lives are controlled by extremely violent gangs, and the guards are allowed to shoot them if they step in he wrong area, and are only concerned with keeping order and not anyone's safety. instead of getting euthanized, I'd like to see the look on this bitches face when she was told what a no hands policy is.

[removed]

[removed]

You just said you disagreed with the decision because killing her is somehow a "get out of jail free card". You are literally saying you want her to suffer, that freaking DEATH isn't enough. That's sadism, and about as black-and-white thinking as you can get.

[removed]

Guess they really don't waffle on stuff like this over there.

[removed]

Awfully defensive. This is reddit, not a political news cast. Find something more meaningful in life than writing paragraphs attacking 2 sentence comments.

I'm not sure what gives you the idea that I would take joy in another's suffering. Surely one can question the ethical implications of a legal decision without being accused of sadism. Or do you live in a world that is so black and white?

[removed]

Good ol anti-vax Dickie.

well if tmr there were billboards displaying "black people should be in chains", i would definitely want people to report on it so it receives the attention and hatred it deserves.

[removed]

they dont care about the potential humans, they care about their potential free ticket upstairs

She was already out of prison. Besides that, it's not a "get out of jail free card", it's not just an "ask and you shall receive", there's an entire, very long and intense procedure with several different doctors that need to sign off on it. It was deemed that she was suffering from unbearable mental distress, with no chance of recovery.

[removed]