Recent comments in /f/newjersey

Sdmws6 t1_j9hap1q wrote

IMHO, I feel it’s mainly 3 reasons:

  1. With many people from NY moving into NJ because of COVID, who have never had a reason to drive and suddenly they’re driving on major highways, there are many more erratic and inexperienced drivers causing traffic and accidents on the road.
  2. NJ inspection stations have not failed vehicles for mechanical faults in years, instead simply checking for a CEL. This results in unsafe cars that may look fine on the outside but have no brakes, bald tires, lights out, blown shocks, etc. These all relate to longer stopping distances and major instability at speed.
  3. Lastly, the general performance and sportiness of cars nowadays is truly amazing, but scary for many people on the roads. Look at the last generation Accord 2.0sport. It’s a family sedan with a quarter mile time equal to a dedicated sports car of only 10-15 years ago. Mix these all together and I feel this explains why NJ roads are the way they are.
6

silentsnip94 t1_j9h7qdz wrote

Look up MedicZero, Inc. It's a nonprofit run by Rutgers students/alumni who are EMTs, they teach bystander CPR classes which teach CPR and stroke awareness. You don't get a certification, but you learn what signs to look for, how to perform CPR/use an AED, how to direct other bystanders to help & call 911 while you perform CPR. My local library/OEM department organized the class and about 50 of us residents showed up. It was a real eye opening experience and I feel confident about performing CPR should someone need it. (The Good Samaritan law protects bystanders performing CPR who aren't certified).

If you're on Instagram, you can find them at @mediczeroinc or @mediczerorutgers

Highly recommend contacting them to find a class or set up a class for your town!

2

Dux-Mathildis t1_j9h4h8b wrote

You might think they're ugly, but I think they're cool-looking--so I'm not sure that point matters much at all.

What I do find really important is trying literally anything at all to wean this country off coal and oil! Wind turbines offer that opportunity; not saying they're perfect but I'd rather a dozen turbines over one more Deep Horizon spill.

3

evgeney t1_j9h3dca wrote

Was gonna defend you but it's a controversial term

"The term is often defined as offensive or racist stereotyping. In some cases, users of the term assert that it is not offensive or racist, or else treat the term as a humorous, mild insult rather than a racial slur.

Early usage 1917 to 1930s Examples of "rice burner" used literally, meaning one who burns rice or rice fields, as in stubble burning, date to 1917. In 1935 it appeared in a US newspaper caption in with a racial connotation, disparaging East Asian people."

Clear you didn't mean it that way but fyi

1

beowulf92 t1_j9h2754 wrote

While that's certainly possible, then you'd see this same scenario occurring all around the world where sonar is used for mapping around shipping lanes and whale migratory paths. Now I don't keep up with any news with stuff like that, so maybe it has been witnessed before, but I personally would need to see this scenario being seen elsewhere to truly be on board that sonar right now off our coast is to blame. There could also be a litany of other factors around our shoreline specifically that could be attributed to it too. Cleaner waters than we've had in the past could be leading to a healthier ecosystem with more fish and shrimp-esque organisms the whales will feed on, drawing them closer to shore and into shipping lanes. I've also seen theories of disease circulating around populations off our coast, which of the organisms are tested and that's found to be the case, would be a factor then. It should certainly be looked at, and if proven to have an actual correlation with the sonar, then yes it should be addressed. I haven't looked at any data, but if there's been an increase in beachings over the last several years preceding any mapping occurring, then that would point to something else being a cause as well.

3