Recent comments in /f/movies

Funny_Science_9377 t1_ja5n1x6 wrote

In OG Star Trek 2 when Khan is about to blast the Enterprise and crew. He demands Kirk turn over remote control of the ship to him. Kirk swears he’s about to transmit the codes to Khan and he lets Spock and the others know what to do. When he finally gives the order to blow Khan out of the sky he simply says: Here it comes…

2

paulsammons3 t1_ja5mwvr wrote

I think the argument would then become, what’s the point of identifying a gender besides anything more than has a penis and has a vagina. It’s a construct because the identification is kind of pointless for non-science and sometimes sex related reasons. Which is why there’s more of a push to remove he/she and just make it they. I think.

1

twothrone t1_ja5m33s wrote

PTA movies are generally narreted by visuals. He likes to use the screen as his canvas. So generally its a personal journey like seeing a real art piece. For exapmle if you see a bird in a oil painting and consider it as a bird drawn by artist but for a troubled soul it can resemble as an encapsulation of freedom. I think he is one of the best directors that can be considered creating true art. So its normal that you feel like you dont understand them.

3

A88_I99 t1_ja5le4q wrote

I sort of get what you're saying. You're basically just describing stereotypes and roles associated with being masculine or feminine.

The part that confuses me is that you don't have to be interested in playing football and getting dirty or being the primary source of income, etc. to be a man, and you don't have to wear make-up and dresses and enjoy shopping to be a woman. For example, if a guy doesn't like sports but likes clothes and shopping, does this mean that they are non-binary according to your definition of gender? It doesn't really make sense to me.

1