Recent comments in /f/massachusetts
Hoosac_Love t1_jde7evp wrote
Reply to Fuel Assistance by Competitive_Event_55
The likelyhood is that your carrier will pay the full benefit by 4-30-23 and your account will have a large credit but I can't guaruntee that though.
somegridplayer t1_jde6wv0 wrote
Reply to comment by sc00p401 in Andrew’s Point, Rockport: Homeowner suing to end public access by SarcasticRaspberries
>if she doesnt want dogs on her property then GET A FUCKING FENCE
It's kind of her right given there's leash laws. It is a bit of a dick move to let your dog wander around on someone else's property.
louwish t1_jde6kzg wrote
MATT DAMON
Hoosac_Love t1_jde6azr wrote
Reply to Fuel Assistance by Competitive_Event_55
Maybe if you paid all your bills then you might lose some ,if you have an acrewed bills then it will be applied.I re-aplied also in late october because mine was a renewal not a first apllication and I did not pay my gas bill and it had a balance of 900 something and fuel assistence paid the full $900 march 8.
If you have a back balance it's covered don't worry.
What happens to unused fuel assistence after april varries fuel company to fuel company ,you might ask them.My company Berkshire gas gives us a credit in the system and often I don't get another bill until september but I can't speak for your carrier.
Yes your gas and elecric bills will get a reduced rate for the full year.
Now that your approved your carrier knows you are approved next year they likely won't shut off for delinquent payment and then when the FA hits your account in march the back balance will be covered.
Cal__Trask t1_jde662j wrote
Reply to comment by BeardiesRule112 in Andrew’s Point, Rockport: Homeowner suing to end public access by SarcasticRaspberries
Amen, I will see you there!!!
AllstarGaming617 OP t1_jde61nk wrote
Reply to comment by NativeMasshole in Driver Retraining Program 3 times for license reinstatement after 15 years of incompetence? by AllstarGaming617
Oh this is excellent information. Because of the last interaction I had with the state I thought I kind of put the nail in my own coffin by paying the infractions in exchange for the removal of the misdemeanor driving on a suspended. Akin to a plea deal, I was concerned by doing that I’d have no legal recourse going forward. Knowing they’ve had legal issues themselves, potentially the period of time in which this first happened to me might give me some ground to stand on. I’ll look into that and proceed with contacting people higher up via the mass.gov directory. I didn’t realize the RMV had a court system/legal connection to the state(most traffic courts aren’t connected directly to the RMV/dmv in other states.) thanks for the info!
AllstarGaming617 OP t1_jde53ez wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Driver Retraining Program 3 times for license reinstatement after 15 years of incompetence? by AllstarGaming617
Apparently that’s what I’ve been unknowingly doing lol
sadgringopapi t1_jde52o6 wrote
Diegos_kitchen t1_jde4g1v wrote
Is there anywhere we can donate to help fight her case?
Bearawesome t1_jde42v2 wrote
This woman looks exactly how I picture her.
print_isnt_dead t1_jde2k18 wrote
Reply to comment by BeardiesRule112 in Andrew’s Point, Rockport: Homeowner suing to end public access by SarcasticRaspberries
I have a feeling it’s going to be busy!! My dog loves climbing on rocks
wrenhunter t1_jde2io3 wrote
I like the part where the Globe turned off the comments. I know they were available earlier, but the pitchforks were getting real pointy I guess!
print_isnt_dead t1_jde2dgy wrote
Reply to comment by Cal__Trask in Andrew’s Point, Rockport: Homeowner suing to end public access by SarcasticRaspberries
I honestly gasped when I opened this
And I’m going to go walk there now that I know about it
[deleted] t1_jde28lo wrote
Reply to comment by ocean-airseashell10 in Custom foot orthotics by ocean-airseashell10
[deleted]
NCSUGrad2012 t1_jde11yb wrote
Reply to comment by DeffNotTom in Found this obviously fake license plate on my commute after they cut me off by masonf4
Not only is the format wrong but Massachusetts hasn’t issued I or Q on standard issue plates since they had the green plates.
BeardiesRule112 t1_jde0wzp wrote
I’ve never gone there before but guess what I’m doing this weekend!
sc00p401 t1_jddz92d wrote
No one's gonna be peeping at this crone, and if she doesnt want dogs on her property then GET A FUCKING FENCE YOU'RE CERTAINLY RICH ENOUGH TO AFFORD IT.
three-ple t1_jddyiw6 wrote
Reply to comment by PLS-Surveyor-US in They’ve Been Warned: Attorney General Says Suburbs ‘Must Comply’ With Transit-Oriented Housing Law by psychothumbs
:shrug: I mean I disagree with aspects of plenty of laws. Many still have a positive impact.
But your characterization is wrong. Holden doesn't have to "build hundreds of thousands of units". It has to *zone* 50 acres to allow up to 750 units to be built [1]. That is it.
The city doesn't have to build a damn thing. Private enterprise will do that.
Holden surface area is 23,000 acres. 0.2% of it will need to be designated as higher density. There is so much hand wringing going on over ultimately a minor change to zoning in the area.
Every other discussion point here is completely speculative. If Holden is such a terrible place to build, nobody will build the density. If Holden has problems with water/sewer, that will have to be figured out, but there won't be some magical fairy that comes in and forces them at gunpoint to build a new wastewater treatment plant overnight. If some other thing happens to Holden as part of this, I suspect they will have the intelligence and wherewithal to deal with it.
Let's. Move. Forward. Create the zoning. Work through the next steps.
​
DeliPaper t1_jddydcu wrote
Me using my rconstitutional right to fishing, fowling and navigation:
ocean-airseashell10 OP t1_jddy66e wrote
Reply to comment by therapeutic-distance in Custom foot orthotics by ocean-airseashell10
Gotcha! Thanks
Cal__Trask t1_jddxxdz wrote
She even looks like a villain in the photo. If she doesn't like the easement she should move to a place she does like instead of trying to ruin 146 year old public path for everyone else.
swoldier_force t1_jddxk5r wrote
tl;dr, Wealthy lawyers who owns oceanfront property “seeking to void a provision in her deed, dating to 1887, that the coastal rocks and ledges on her property must remain open to the general public.”
She knew all this when she bought the place. Smh.
[deleted] t1_jddw5yi wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in One lingering thought on all the upheaval... by caminandoennubes
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_jddtqc8 wrote
Reply to comment by cimson-otter in One lingering thought on all the upheaval... by caminandoennubes
[deleted]
AllstarGaming617 OP t1_jde7man wrote
Reply to comment by ManifestDestinysChld in Driver Retraining Program 3 times for license reinstatement after 15 years of incompetence? by AllstarGaming617
Admittedly you’re not wrong and I’m being overtly passive in trying to just achieve the end goal as simply as possible. The first two instances when I was 20 and 25 are excusable. My first two interactions with the legal system. The biggest mistake was not lawyering up on what I thought was the final issue in Newburyport court. My issue with litigation is time, and the fact that I think I may have shot myself in the foot when I thought I was finally settling the matter and got all the official documentation that everything was paid and my license was considered valid based on no fines being owed. Looking through the paperwork vs state law im worried I essential “plead” guilty for moving violations in return for having the misdemeanor of driving on a suspended removed from my record. That’s not how it was presented to me in court, and why I feel stupid for not lawyering up at that point. So I’m not sure a lawyer could do anything for me now.