Recent comments in /f/massachusetts
ky1e t1_jd94ao5 wrote
Reply to comment by ahecht in One lingering thought on all the upheaval... by caminandoennubes
that is simply untrue, admins never appointed them. Why would they do that and keep myself and NightProcrastinator here?
sneakylyric t1_jd948pr wrote
Reply to comment by Definitelynotcal1gul in Cheap house. Under 300k. You’re not a homeowner because you’re lazy…. by fuertepqek
I mean I figured I'm either paying the same in rent and not gaining any equity, or I pay it towards a mortgage and gain equity.
I can always refinance for a lower rate 🤞🏽.
[deleted] t1_jd945a5 wrote
[deleted]
Alluminatus OP t1_jd942ix wrote
Reply to comment by Hoosac_Love in East West Rail Commission by Alluminatus
Currently there is one train east and one train west for Springfield and Pittsfield, the current preferred alternatives by the DOT list 8 trains a day along the route for alt 3 while the other 2 call for 10 trains a day
Edit: currently the train is also slower on the route between Boston and Springfield than trains in 1922.
ahecht t1_jd93v4e wrote
Reply to comment by Mnemon-TORreport in One lingering thought on all the upheaval... by caminandoennubes
L-I-B said that he was appointed as moderator to twice, once by /u/ky1e and once by the reddit admins (probably applied at /r/redditrequest saying that the existing mods were inactive). Not sure what happened between those times.
CitizenDain t1_jd93uqm wrote
Reply to Repost, as this was removed earlier today. My favorite Polar flavor is back!! by Ready-Interview-9809
WHERE CAN I GET THIS
AboyNamedBort t1_jd93npg wrote
Reply to comment by wet_cupcake in This idea of building outdoor malls with a parking area in the middle by Sayoria
Assembly Row isn't incredible. Its an outdoor shopping mall next to a a T station yet they dedicated 90% of the space to cars. The best part about indoor malls is no cars yet they fucked that up. It could have been incredible if they designed it for people instead of SUVs from the suburbs.
alexandercecil t1_jd93l1w wrote
Reply to comment by 9Z7EErh9Et0y0Yjt98A4 in They’ve Been Warned: Attorney General Says Suburbs ‘Must Comply’ With Transit-Oriented Housing Law by psychothumbs
I apologize, but I really do not want to get into the exact town I live in. I do not mean to be rude or stifle discussion, but I am a volunteer elected official in my town. Many people in this post seem to have a lot of vitriol on this topic. I am not comfortable doxxing myself at that level. I have shared more than I normally might in this circumstance because I feel that the discussion is important for all of us to be having.
I can get into the rezoning in a general sense, though. A major part of this legislation that gets glossed over is that the town cannot simply create a zone that is not feasible to be developed as intended. What does this mean? This is a good question, and my limited understanding is the lawyers from several municipalities are trying to figure that out.
In terms of water and sewer alone, my town cannot support this level of development. We literally cannot just choose to spend money and increase our capacity. The public water and sewer services in my town are separate entities from the town government. This is more common than people might realize in Massachusetts, though it is not the way the majority of municipalities are structured. Even if our sewer commission was willing to increase services, which they might be willing to do, they lease capacity from one or more adjacent municipalities since we do not have the density and demand to support a treatment plant. These municipalities are not looking to lease us more of their limited supply. Could this legislation force us to build a sewer processing plant for several million dollars that can only be used by a comparatively small number of people? It may. Again, the full repercussions are not yet known because the legislation is not as clear as it might seem.
In addition, the increased housing as specified by this legislation could cause a double-digit percentage increase to our town's population. Our school, fire, and police services are at capacity. Our budget is tight enough that our debt needs are planned out and maxed for many years in future. We cannot add capacity without new infrastructure.
Again, I am sorry that I cannot just come out and get into the exact name and previous details of my town. My desire to have my town email account flooded or my wife and kids harassed is pretty huge. I am not a politician and public figure in the way we think of them. I am a guy who was elected into his town government because he is one of the few willing to do the volunteer work to keep his town running. I have boundaries. I would share more if I could.
Tempest_1 t1_jd93f7r wrote
Reply to comment by zeratul98 in This idea of building outdoor malls with a parking area in the middle by Sayoria
Gonna have to disagree. I’ve had plenty of day trips and nighttime excursions when i never had a car because of the T stop.
If you live on the orange line it’s hella convenient.
Imaginary_wizard t1_jd93ap0 wrote
Reply to comment by majoroutage in One lingering thought on all the upheaval... by caminandoennubes
He had said in his personal sub he had multiple accounts
LowkeyPony t1_jd938cq wrote
Reply to comment by jp_jellyroll in This idea of building outdoor malls with a parking area in the middle by Sayoria
Merrimack Outlets. No tax. Was there last weekend and there were buses pulling in.
Hoosac_Love t1_jd935g4 wrote
Reply to East West Rail Commission by Alluminatus
How often is this going to be ,isn't there anyway a Boston/Springfield twice per day and being that train deadheads in Chicago I'd imagine it stops in Pittsfield MA before Rensselaer NY and then onto Buffalo
commentsOnPizza t1_jd92yxo wrote
Reply to comment by Dizzy_De_De in Cheap house. Under 300k. You’re not a homeowner because you’re lazy…. by fuertepqek
At first glance, ideas like this make sense. However, a big problem is that those locations often don't have the infrastructure necessary to support what you're talking about. While Boston doesn't build housing nearly as quickly as it needs to, places outside the Boston/128 loop often build at half the rate Boston does and often have residents that don't want to build housing faster. Most areas don't have a public transit network outside of Boston and it's really hard to add more cars.
For example, Google employs 2,100 people in Cambridge. An interstate highway can carry about 2,200 cars per hour per lane. So to support just Google's relatively small presence in Cambridge via cars would basically require adding two lanes to an interstate (one out and one in). Given that the cars would need to slow down and park, it would require a lot more infrastructure.
It's also hard to incentivize good jobs to move somewhere. For a company like Google, they want to locate their offices where they're confident they'll get workers and can continue to grow and expand. In Cambridge, Google has expanded from 441 employees in 2008 to 2,100 in 2022. If the state offered Google some incentive to open an office in Springfield or Worcester, how would Google incentivize workers to move out there? When Google opened an office in Cambridge, it was already a place where lots of software engineers lived and wanted to live. Maybe Google could pay workers more, but then there's really no state incentive for Google since they likely have to spend more than that incentive getting workers to move.
In fact, how much of an incentive could the state offer? $10,000 per worker per year? At that point, the worker would need to earn over $200,000 for the state to break even (since the state taxes on a $200,000 salary would be less than $10,000). Even then, the state is losing tons of money. If that worker were in Cambridge without a state subsidy, the state would make nearly $10,000 in tax revenue rather than losing money. Would Google take $10,000 per worker per year? Probably not. "Hey, we'd like to give you $5M per year to open a small 500 worker office in a location that puts your company at a big competitive disadvantage compared to your peers who will be able to more easily hire top talent in desirable locations." $5M is tiny to a company whose revenue is $282B - oh, $282B plus $836M; the $836M was just such an uninterestingly low amount of money compared to the $282B.
That's not to say that the state can't do things to make places like New Bedford, Lowell, Worcester, and Springfield more attractive for business. However, it takes time (like a decade or more) and there are going to be moves that many residents might dislike. Creating business districts that are nice for transit, walking, and biking will mean trading off parking and road throughput. Residents often hate new housing because they worry about traffic and parking. What happens when you say that you're going to be bringing in a truck-full of new housing because you're looking to incentivize businesses to move there? How do they react when you tell them that the parking lot they like using is going to become a building with minimal parking - and there will be a lot more people trying to get to that area too?
If you want employers to move to areas, they need to feel confident that it's a good investment. Money won't sway them - at least not any amount of money it would be sane to spend on an incentive. When Amazon was looking for HQ2, they weren't swayed by incentives. They were simply looking to milk money out of the locations they already wanted to go to - NYC and DC, places where the workers they want already wanted to live. Massachusetts can't offer Google $50M a year to hire 500 people outside of Boston. That would be $100,000 per worker. We can't give Google 20 people's taxes for every worker they hire outside Boston/128.
If we want places like Worcester and Lowell to be places where companies want to go, we need to focus on creating the environment that will make that happen. For example, if we had a higher speed express rail link between Lowell and Boston, that could make Lowell a place more easily commutable to for existing workers. A tech worker could move to Lowell and commute to Boston which incentivizes a tech company to move to Lowell. A tech company moving to Lowell could retain more workers living in Boston if it were a reasonable commute. If we started converting a lot of the parking around the Lowell rail stop to businesses and housing and allowed any building to be 5-stories tall within half a mile of the station without parking requirements, that could make sure that there would be housing and new office space available as companies and workers need it. If we put more money into public transit in Lowell and started converting car lanes into bus lanes, we could ensure people could get around (a bus lane moves more people per hour than a car lane).
But I can already hear the complaints. People don't often think about how their community has to change in order to accommodate the kinds of things you want. They want the jobs, but they don't want to have the traffic or parking difficulties - difficulties that will be compounded by the fact that you'll have to give up some of that parking while also having more people in the area. There's a lot of 1 and 2-family homes a couple blocks from the Lowell rail station. Will they be receptive to people building larger apartment buildings? People often want the jobs/money without any changes. Often times people will literally say, "can't they build it somewhere else?" That's what's already happening while they're complaining people aren't bringing all the money and building to their town!
What's a concrete example of this? Somerville. The city isn't perfect, but it has leveraged its way to the kind of thing you're talking about. I know, it's in the Boston area, but it's building itself up as a biotech hub along the Green Line Extension (and Assembly on the Orange Line). What are some of the keys? They got a rail link that ensures workers can get to jobs, they're minimizing parking, and they're making it an increasingly nice place to bike, walk, and hang out. Somerville wasn't always what it's like today.
If other cities outside Boston/128 want that kind of development, they're going to need to do similar things. What stands in the way? A bunch of things. Money is always hard to come by and infrastructure isn't cheap. The fact that suburbs like North Billerica would likely dislike being bypassed on a job-connector rail line might make an express line difficult. Boston/Cambridge/Somerville outweigh their suburbs more than Lowell or Worcester do. Ultimately, I think the biggest thing that stands in the way is that a lot of people aren't looking for their city to change. Sure, they'll complain that Boston gets all the good jobs, but most would also hate my proposal to increase housing and move people away from cars.
Creating social change like that isn't easy. Cities across the country have tried to lure workers with offers of cheap housing and tens of thousands of dollars and they've had almost no takers. Cities sometimes likewise try to draw companies with incentives and usually get burned in the process. The company milks the town for all it's worth and doesn't actually generate economic benefits for the area. What creates sustainable economic benefits are when you create a good environment for economic prosperity. However, that also means giving up some things that many residents might prize: parking minimums so that you never have to pay for or hunt for parking at the stores you go to, apartments that bring new neighbors, and more traffic and a bit of a modal shift toward public transit.
There is the potential to do it in other ways. Maybe you don't want a lot of new housing. Somerville is doing that with one of the lowest levels of new homes in Boston. At the same time, people dislike the rising rents and displacement. We could create a business-only focused Lowell or Worcester revitalization plan, but what's the point if most of the current residents won't get to benefit from it?
Ultimately, if we want businesses to move to those cities, we need to make them places people want to be and that can accommodate population growth (though more housing and public transportation) so that businesses know they can grow and thrive there. Otherwise, we're just going to get garbage businesses who will take money and deliver no benefits.
I am curious if there were specific incentives you'd like to see done. If you were governor and legislature of Mass, what would you do - keeping in mind that there's basically no reasonable amount of money you could pay a company to incentivize them to move to Worcester?
[deleted] OP t1_jd92ojw wrote
Reply to comment by FIFAFanboy2023 in Renting in MA: Bed Bug Addendum in an apartment lease... is this normal or a red flag?? by [deleted]
[deleted]
AceyAceyAcey t1_jd92o5y wrote
Reply to comment by langjie in FREEDOM!!! Cheers to new mods! by Maubert_Doughbear
The whole thing of banning POCs who are asking for support from other POCs of similar heritage and saying it’s ✌️racist✌️ is just so…. 🤷I mean, talk about fragility!
pr0m3th3us42 t1_jd92c7g wrote
Ha! Best part is it's already under contract.
majoroutage t1_jd92aiz wrote
Reply to comment by BobQuasit in This idea of building outdoor malls with a parking area in the middle by Sayoria
The dark arts of logistics sometimes dictate that it's cheaper and more sensible for them to fill an extra suitcase with quality products that will last than to ever buy the Walmart grade shit back home.
EDIT. And it's not just manufactured clothing either. Some of these people know how to clear out textile outlets too.
FIFAFanboy2023 t1_jd929qh wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Renting in MA: Bed Bug Addendum in an apartment lease... is this normal or a red flag?? by [deleted]
I had a bed bug infestation in a previous apartment that was from the previous tenants who had moved out 4 months prior. The landlord had some work to do so it sat vacant. We eventually traced the source to an electric outlet on the second floor.
They are a tricky animal, however what I learned was that they don't travel long distances so chances are if you have bed bugs you brought them in.
ioncloud9 t1_jd926gq wrote
Reply to comment by DDups2 in Cheap house. Under 300k. You’re not a homeowner because you’re lazy…. by fuertepqek
Meanwhile the homeowners are a stay at home mom and an independent butterfly cage accessory door to door salesman. Their budget is $1.2 million.
NooStringsAttached t1_jd91rma wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in This idea of building outdoor malls with a parking area in the middle by Sayoria
Legacy place in Dedham too? They all look so similar to me.
headrush46n2 t1_jd91ksl wrote
just a little meteor damage, you can buff that out.
SkiZer0 t1_jd91h5s wrote
Reply to To Ky1e: by FuzzAldrin36
Thank you u/ky1e
LowkeyPony t1_jd91dat wrote
Reply to comment by FC_Twente_Benson in Looking into moving to Mass. Would love to hear about the good, the bad, the ugly of living in your wonderful state! by InspectorFun1699
Pretty sure Fitchburg and some other surrounding towns up here voted for him as well. But we have a lot of "former" NH redneck morons up in this area
ZiaGyPSy t1_jd90ka6 wrote
Reply to comment by Shnikes in Cheap house. Under 300k. You’re not a homeowner because you’re lazy…. by fuertepqek
It’s everywhere, man. This one sold by me not long ago…
https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/17412-W-17th-Pl-Golden-CO-80401/13711983_zpid/
[deleted] t1_jd94fej wrote
Reply to comment by greenharibo in Does anyone know a reputable Subaru Mechanic in Central MA by pb_and-j_
[deleted]