Recent comments in /f/massachusetts
Shnikes t1_jd87frw wrote
[deleted] OP t1_jd87er0 wrote
Reply to comment by Quirky_Butterfly_946 in Renting in MA: Bed Bug Addendum in an apartment lease... is this normal or a red flag?? by [deleted]
[deleted]
Stezo45 t1_jd876vz wrote
Reply to comment by Scribblr in Cheap house. Under 300k. You’re not a homeowner because you’re lazy…. by fuertepqek
That’s mean
[deleted] t1_jd8769r wrote
Reply to comment by Scribblr in Cheap house. Under 300k. You’re not a homeowner because you’re lazy…. by fuertepqek
[deleted]
ay-o-river t1_jd873s6 wrote
Reply to comment by WinsingtonIII in Looking into moving to Mass. Would love to hear about the good, the bad, the ugly of living in your wonderful state! by InspectorFun1699
I’ll never forget being in a cvs in Richmond VA and a guy IN THE OTHER AISLE said hello to me and got offended that I didn’t immediately say hello back
Scribblr t1_jd86zev wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Cheap house. Under 300k. You’re not a homeowner because you’re lazy…. by fuertepqek
So was it the shitty part of Springfield or the shitty part of Fall River?
[deleted] t1_jd86u53 wrote
Reply to comment by ThreeDogs2022 in Cheap house. Under 300k. You’re not a homeowner because you’re lazy…. by fuertepqek
[deleted]
AboyNamedBort t1_jd86tor wrote
Reply to comment by InspectorFun1699 in Looking into moving to Mass. Would love to hear about the good, the bad, the ugly of living in your wonderful state! by InspectorFun1699
Then definitiley check out the Northampton area and the Berkshires. Both kinda rural but very progressive and lots of culture.
dannikilljoy t1_jd86i85 wrote
Reply to comment by oneMadRssn in They’ve Been Warned: Attorney General Says Suburbs ‘Must Comply’ With Transit-Oriented Housing Law by psychothumbs
Yeah a big problem with the whole MBTA communities definition is it includes towns that don't have an MBTA stop in or within a mile of the town, much less half a mile.
ex. Stow, MA to which the nearest MBTA stop (South Acton, Fitchburg Line) is ~1 mile from the town border. So communities like Stow literally can not comply with this law.
tjrileywisc t1_jd85g1n wrote
Reply to comment by rolandofgilead41089 in They’ve Been Warned: Attorney General Says Suburbs ‘Must Comply’ With Transit-Oriented Housing Law by psychothumbs
Well I have suburban NIMBYs in my town who do have this infrastructure who also think our city shouldn't have to allow the housing, and they're expecting rural communities to allow it instead.
The only fair solution I see here is that everyone needs to relax a little and let the market get an equilibrium... which seems to be the approach the state is going for.
For what it's worth, the state put a cap on the amount of housing required in more rural communities after getting feedback during the comment session.
wittgensteins-boat t1_jd85ep0 wrote
Reply to comment by superbbuffalo in They’ve Been Warned: Attorney General Says Suburbs ‘Must Comply’ With Transit-Oriented Housing Law by psychothumbs
Wealthy communities will care about losing State funding / grants to improve roads in the amount of above a million dollars a year. Mass Works is one program.
And losing other grants, which could include grants for conservation lands, and in the fullnessvof time, eventually could include educational funding,
3720-To-One t1_jd85elj wrote
Reply to comment by PLS-Surveyor-US in They’ve Been Warned: Attorney General Says Suburbs ‘Must Comply’ With Transit-Oriented Housing Law by psychothumbs
Cool, and when every single suburb thinks they are special and that housing should be built somewhere else nothing gets built.
Your suburb isn’t special. It doesn’t exist in a vacuum.
I’m glad the state is finally telling these suburbs to shape up.
Lab spaces… you think the people who work in these offices and labs only live in Boston proper?
Funny, suburbanites have no problem outsourcing their office, labs, hospitals, museums, sports stadia, etc. to the city.
mallorn_hugger t1_jd85dlj wrote
Reply to comment by wittgensteins-boat in Hooray for Western Mass by richg0404
Right?? It's great for hiking and it's only 15 minutes or so from Shelburne Falls, which is quaint and lovely, but a hidden gem people are missing out on? No.
thomastodon01027 t1_jd85b5p wrote
Reply to comment by heavyiron382 in They’ve Been Warned: Attorney General Says Suburbs ‘Must Comply’ With Transit-Oriented Housing Law by psychothumbs
If you rezone for Smart Growth, the state gives funds for the new kids. That’s what we did in Easthampton. Beyond that, the child population of the state is declining, so an increase in enrollment is really the last thing most communities should worry about.
bionicN t1_jd854wf wrote
Reply to comment by heavyiron382 in They’ve Been Warned: Attorney General Says Suburbs ‘Must Comply’ With Transit-Oriented Housing Law by psychothumbs
natural growth would require lifting zoning laws.
there's nothing natural about forcing single family housing or low density. the demand for more housing is there.
more housing will reduce total costs by reducing absurd housing costs, which are a much bigger part of most people's finances than taxes.
Easy-Progress8252 t1_jd84ue6 wrote
Reply to What happens now to this sub? by smmshad
I don’t understand what happened and frankly don’t have the time or mental energy to want to invest in it. I did to make this comment though. Let’s talk all things Massachusetts!
mtbv08 t1_jd84tsy wrote
Reply to comment by InspectorFun1699 in Looking into moving to Mass. Would love to hear about the good, the bad, the ugly of living in your wonderful state! by InspectorFun1699
It depends where - if you don't need easy access to Boston, you can have a reasonable housing costs outside 495. Daycare costs are astronomical across the state though...
[deleted] t1_jd84sdw wrote
[deleted]
3720-To-One t1_jd84r3w wrote
Reply to comment by heavyiron382 in They’ve Been Warned: Attorney General Says Suburbs ‘Must Comply’ With Transit-Oriented Housing Law by psychothumbs
“Stop looking for government to solve your issues.”
Funny, the only ones looking for government to solve their issues are the NIMBY’s trying to use municipal governments to block housing from being built in their suburbs.
I’m in favor of less government involvement in housing. Which means letting the market having a much bigger say in what gets built where, much to the chagrin of whining, entitled NIMBYs like yourself.
And that’s literally what this push from the state is doing. It’s the state government telling local municipalities to get fucked, and to allow higher density housing yo be built.
And no, I’m not going to work a second job because people like you feel entitled to use the government to shield you from having to live close to other people.
You own your property, not your neighbor’s, not the neighborhood.
PLS-Surveyor-US t1_jd84k99 wrote
Reply to comment by 9Z7EErh9Et0y0Yjt98A4 in They’ve Been Warned: Attorney General Says Suburbs ‘Must Comply’ With Transit-Oriented Housing Law by psychothumbs
For what it's worth, I have never advocated creating zero growth communities. This state brags about how smart it is but on this issue, how smart is it to build out farm land in Holden when you have much better options near actual MBTA stations? The roads are overloaded. Putting more apartments farther from the jobs is a bad strategy. Building hundreds of new wastewater treatment plants out side the MWRA system is also a costly mistake in my opinion. I recognize something is needed to be done, I work on housing projects all over eastern mass.
Two elements fix the supply bottleneck. 1) Zoning reform. Approve any building permit request that matches the zoning of any lot within 100' of the subject parcel. This would cut permitting times into a fraction of the time now. 1 year becomes 30 days. This would include dimensional and use reform (multi vs single fam). 2) Any site within 1/2 mile of an MBTA rapid transit or commuter rail station could build with the same density of any other building near an MBTA station (this would ramp up the TOD successes that have helped increase supply.
Anything else should be incentivized through the tax code to increase supply and not beat down people's throats. Carrot is better than the stick.
TwoforFlinching613 t1_jd84jgg wrote
a little paint and some elbow grease, good a new!
heavyiron382 t1_jd84asr wrote
Reply to comment by bionicN in They’ve Been Warned: Attorney General Says Suburbs ‘Must Comply’ With Transit-Oriented Housing Law by psychothumbs
I am over 45 miles from Boston. I am in very much a rural town. We have a commuter rail station that is a 10 minute ride from my house. Other parts of the town 20 minutes to get there do to rural roads. I don't disagree that towns need to do something but it should be based on the towns wanting to not be forced to or else you lose funding. That is blackmail on the highest level.
SainTheGoo t1_jd846j1 wrote
Reply to comment by UltravioletClearance in Cheap house. Under 300k. You’re not a homeowner because you’re lazy…. by fuertepqek
Ugh, that's distressing to hear. Study I read said adverse effects up to 500 feet away. Hopefully the other houses and trees absorb some of the ill effects from my nearby highway.
bionicN t1_jd83pwq wrote
Reply to comment by heavyiron382 in They’ve Been Warned: Attorney General Says Suburbs ‘Must Comply’ With Transit-Oriented Housing Law by psychothumbs
lol, "rural."
some of the most NIMBY places are <10 miles from the city center, with T and commuter rail stations.
I'm in a NIMBY town, and I say build it. we can't afford not to.
it's wild to expect something a moderate bike ride away from Boston government center be called "rural."
LetsPlayCanasta t1_jd87kht wrote
Reply to Orange,MA stabbing leads to police chase and 3 arrested by Hoosac_Love
There was a two hour window where Belchertown police were like: "hey, there's a fugitive in town who might be armed and dangerous."