Recent comments in /f/massachusetts

Rindan t1_jab1dbh wrote

A strip club where they serve weed instead of alcohol sounds like a brilliant idea. If absolutely nothing else, stoned patrons are a lot less likely to be a problem that drunk ones. Granted, that isn't what they are doing immediately, presumably because the state won't let them.

Personally, I wish they'd just legalize weed the way that alcohol is legal. I like going out. I like going out and sitting around with friends in a bar like environment. I just don't like drinking. If I drink, even if I don't drink enough to have fun, I get absolute shit sleep that night. If I drink enough to have fun, I'm going to get shit sleep and wake up feeling like absolute crap. On top of that, if I do it often, I get fat.

Weed on other hand though? If I smoke "too much" weed, I just have a really good nights sleep. I'd go out to the bars a lot more if worst price I was going to pay is a good nights sleep.

−1

LackingUtility t1_jaay5pi wrote

Happily, but first, you have to demonstrate to me that you understand Venn diagrams and Boolean logic. Because I’m arguing that the populations do intersect, but that the market is A∩B, not AUB. If you would please provide a paragraph on each type of set and a paragraph discussing their distinctions, I’ll supply the requested research. I’d hate to waste both of our time if you couldn’t understand, you see.

46

LackingUtility t1_jaawbs5 wrote

It’s a terrible idea. Most of the clientele of a dispensary would not be interested in strippers, so you end up reducing your patronage, not increasing it. Even the guys who would be interested will assume that prices will be higher than at the dispensary down the street, and there’s no alcohol or dancing to make up for it.

A night club with weed, alcohol, and live music would be a great thing. But a dispensary plus tits is like a restaurant plus tits - your market is a subset of the restaurant market, not a combination of “people who are hungry” and “people who like tits”.

64