Recent comments in /f/massachusetts

modernhomeowner t1_j8pjbk3 wrote

Only 13% of taxpayers itemize, so 87% automatically won't have to pay tax on the refund. Out of the 13%, only those who didn't pay at least $10k in state tax will have to claim the refund as earnings. Since the vast majority of people who itemize are high earners, this is a very small number of people. I'd suspect the percent of people who will have to pay tax on the refund will be in the very low single digits, maybe even 1% or less of the population.

17

SandyBouattick t1_j8pgiza wrote

I'm not suggesting that teachers come in early and stay late without additional pay. I'd love to see schools or the state hire staff specifically for these roles. If teachers want the extra work for extra pay, cool. If not, there are other people available. In fact, lots of towns have before and after care already, so these people already exist and are working and being paid. I'm just saying we should try to better integrate them into the standard school offering. The cost of before and after care is high for parents, and the school day hours no longer make sense. The days seem to start between 7 and 9 and end between 2 and 3:30. If you have multiple kids, you might need to be driving back and forth multiple times. The school day seems to have been designed with a stay-at-home mom in mind. Those days are mostly gone. We should rethink the school day like we re-thought women's roles in society, and recognize that both parents are typically working full time these days.

2

ShawshankExemption t1_j8pgdgh wrote

The legislature wanted to try and retroactively change the law so that they would they could determine the amounts, as opposed to what the law currently allows for. There was pretty substantial disagreement in the legislature about how they would actually do it, let alone if Baker would sign what they sent him. All this would’ve done was delay and likely reduce the payments people would’ve got.

12

BarRegular2684 t1_j8pdzjt wrote

Seriously. If I want to be all google eyed at celebrities I’ll go to LA. if I’m at Dunkin’ Donuts I’m rushing to something, it’s probably hockey, otherwise I’d be drinking coffee at home. Why would I be happy to see some amateur screwing up my order? I hope someone threw a shoe at him.

5

DUIguy87 t1_j8pcauo wrote

> It’s Boston after all, so we had some rather course and agitated people who were willing to voice their displeasure in a colorful way, and I’m still lobbying to include the most interesting of those in some of the edgiest social spots.

We need to get out hands on the Affleck cut.

41

julie77777 t1_j8pc7sb wrote

Grew up in mass public schools. Moved to Texas end sophomore year of high school. I was so happy to start school at almost 9am. Until getting out at 4pm and felt like my whole day was at school but in mass I would get out at 1:30-2. Also the way the teach is so different so I ended up being taught things in highschool in Texas that I was taught in middle school in mass

8

Academic_Guava_4190 t1_j8pbmdt wrote

But what isn’t taken into effect is that people have to be paid for these roles. Before anyone says teachers get enough time off I ask you to attempt to work in education where a lot of the work happens after the end of the school day at home and a lot of money is paid out of pocket for supplies.

1

Mindless_Arachnid_74 t1_j8pbdbs wrote

  1. Sports and Band. MA actually enforces school hours and kids can’t leave early regularly for activities (yes, happens on occasion but not by rule).
  2. Busses. Neither enough bus drivers or busses to NOT stagger school days. So in order to accomodate the sky-high bussing costs becuase of low supply, districts are beholden to the bus company hours when setting start/end times.
1

srg0pdrs4 t1_j8pa1y5 wrote

No... It's better for some kids, probably the majority given the learned helplessness of many. Teachers are more than babysitters, I certainly didn't act like one...but the general sentiment during Covid was that we were...my feelings.

I can confidently say it's not better for all...and Zoom isn't the only option. In a system of distrust zoom is horrendous, it's mandatory face time...and we all know how much we love that shit as adults.

Could it have been something much better? I absolutely think it could have ushered in a new concept of what school is... Maybe to be seen as more collaborative learning centers/community centers where kids could go rather than had to go... With educators, adjustment counselors, etc there to work with those that need help, in whatever capacity that was.

There is far too much control over the student body (I obviously understand why and there are larger societal problems to deal with before we can comfortably get to my vision) for it ever to feel like a place where kids, particularly adolescents (the only age group I can say I have solid experience with).

The downvotes on my other comments are pretty indicative that I do not represent the norm...lol, for what it's worth.

−3