Recent comments in /f/jerseycity
[deleted] t1_jc1754h wrote
Reply to comment by halocene_epic in Best places to eat in/around grove street by yomama1211
[removed]
abhinav0794 t1_jc0vuia wrote
Reply to Best places to eat in/around grove street by yomama1211
Two boots pizza for a late night beer + slice.
Uncle momo for their underrated bfast
Brick lane for some real deal indian tandoor
Mathew’s/Dullboy for bar bites and good cocktails ( Dullboy is my all time fav )
Lastly Orale for huge portion Mexican food
rickpat10 t1_jc0vu5a wrote
Reply to Wine or book club in JC? by ionlyeatgreenboogers
Interested!
sutisuc t1_jc0sqvu wrote
Reply to comment by JeromePowellAdmirer in A+ coalition building by Progressive Democrats leader Hector Oseguera. Is this his strategy for getting >30% of the vote next time? by clade_nade
How many millionaires live in union city?
Zulumus t1_jc0siot wrote
Reply to comment by JeromePowellAdmirer in A+ coalition building by Progressive Democrats leader Hector Oseguera. Is this his strategy for getting >30% of the vote next time? by clade_nade
As one of those blue collar Union City residents about to have his view blocked, I can guarantee you there aren’t many of these “millionaires” you’re dreaming up. Pretty normal people who just like to keep the little they have.
sutisuc t1_jc0r373 wrote
Reply to comment by paul-e-walnts in A+ coalition building by Progressive Democrats leader Hector Oseguera. Is this his strategy for getting >30% of the vote next time? by clade_nade
Eh it’s Twitter/the internet I wouldn’t take any thing anyone says about who they are at face value
factory377 t1_jc0pjn6 wrote
Reply to comment by LootFroop in Things to do while buzzed in JC? by sgobos
My personal hell
Empty_Smoke_6249 t1_jc0pevm wrote
MossthisMossthatMoss t1_jc0p7jl wrote
Reply to comment by paul-e-walnts in A+ coalition building by Progressive Democrats leader Hector Oseguera. Is this his strategy for getting >30% of the vote next time? by clade_nade
And has probably lived in downtown JC for 5 mins ..
sutisuc t1_jc0og2r wrote
Reply to comment by oseguera2020 in A+ coalition building by Progressive Democrats leader Hector Oseguera. Is this his strategy for getting >30% of the vote next time? by clade_nade
What’s the point of indicating that it’s a densely populated community as part of banning dispensaries?
oseguera2020 t1_jc0oe4u wrote
Reply to comment by JeromePowellAdmirer in A+ coalition building by Progressive Democrats leader Hector Oseguera. Is this his strategy for getting >30% of the vote next time? by clade_nade
You said earlier that I bragged about getting Stack’s endorsement, but you’re showing me a tweet where I said that he does retail politics better than other elected officials in Hudson County, which is just a statement of objective fact.
Able-Space t1_jc0o8t2 wrote
Reply to A+ coalition building by Progressive Democrats leader Hector Oseguera. Is this his strategy for getting >30% of the vote next time? by clade_nade
I think there might be some confusion on what a “YIMBY” is and why it’s worth critiquing. here’s a good explanation, and below is an excerpt if you don’t want to read the whole thing:
The problem, YIMBYs believed, was that a housing shortage was driving up rent prices. They rarely, if ever, talked about corporate landlords charging outrageous rents or that developers were demolishing rent-controlled apartments to build market-rate, luxury housing or that local and state governments needed to build more affordable housing and preserve already existing affordable-housing stock, such as rent-controlled apartments.
YIMBYs simplistically concluded that the housing market needed to be flooded with more apartments, and that would ultimately drive down rents. They knew developers built almost exclusively luxury housing, and that was okay with them. YIMBYs insisted that more luxury housing would solve California’s housing affordability crisis. From the get-go, YIMBYs embraced trickle-down economics or what’s now called “trickle-down housing” policy. As middle- and working-class people have long known, trickle-down anything doesn’t work — except to make the rich richer.”
[deleted] t1_jc0no88 wrote
[deleted] t1_jc0ncxk wrote
[deleted] t1_jc0najs wrote
[deleted] t1_jc0n518 wrote
sutisuc t1_jc0mx53 wrote
Reply to comment by No-Practice-8038 in A+ coalition building by Progressive Democrats leader Hector Oseguera. Is this his strategy for getting >30% of the vote next time? by clade_nade
What are republicans gonna do about it?
kippster93 t1_jc0mr0q wrote
Reply to comment by crystalimpling in Best places to eat in/around grove street by yomama1211
idontbs t1_jc0mld6 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in A+ coalition building by Progressive Democrats leader Hector Oseguera. Is this his strategy for getting >30% of the vote next time? by clade_nade
Found his ghost account
[deleted] t1_jc0miyb wrote
Reply to comment by JCYimby in A+ coalition building by Progressive Democrats leader Hector Oseguera. Is this his strategy for getting >30% of the vote next time? by clade_nade
[deleted]
JeromePowellAdmirer t1_jc0mg0j wrote
Reply to comment by oseguera2020 in A+ coalition building by Progressive Democrats leader Hector Oseguera. Is this his strategy for getting >30% of the vote next time? by clade_nade
On 3/19/21, since deleted: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E1sK1zzWUAAXJ-x?format=png&name=small
Why was it necessary to say all the stuff about "this is a very densely populated community" if you didn't want it to pass? I also don't agree that the majority of Union City residents (an extremely Democratic city) oppose marijuana legalization. The true majority would have supported (had it not been for suppression through machine power) and a no vote on that would have given them a voice.
objectimpermanence t1_jc0m14i wrote
Reply to comment by Zealousideal_Rub5826 in A+ coalition building by Progressive Democrats leader Hector Oseguera. Is this his strategy for getting >30% of the vote next time? by clade_nade
NIMBY progressives tend to think that things like rent control will protect the current resident in that situation.
Which is true, but it’s very short-term oriented. NIMBY policies tend to benefit incumbents at the expense for future generations.
Living in Manhattan or San Francisco can be surprisingly affordable if you happen to still live in the rent controlled or rent-stabilized apartment you moved into in 1992. But all the young artists and professionals who come after you get screwed because rent control and various other NIMBY policies make new construction less abundant and thus more expensive.
Maleficent-Baby-1926 t1_jc0l99r wrote
Reply to imagine paying for the light rail by skyeyemx
the need to build out the transit in JC similar to NYC . more connectivity and greater economic development
MossthisMossthatMoss t1_jc0jss2 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in A+ coalition building by Progressive Democrats leader Hector Oseguera. Is this his strategy for getting >30% of the vote next time? by clade_nade
her initial tweet categorizes “home turf” for select groups, wasn’t JC in 80s/90s made of all walks of life? why divide?
Vertigo963 t1_jc1axx7 wrote
Reply to comment by Empty_Smoke_6249 in A+ coalition building by Progressive Democrats leader Hector Oseguera. Is this his strategy for getting >30% of the vote next time? by clade_nade
For thousands of years, people of every racial and ethnic background have lived similar shameful histories, by creating states with unrepresentative and tyrannical governments, by subordinating and killing dissenters, freethinkers, and minorities, by waging wars of conquest against neighbors, and by keeping members of disfavored groups as slaves. This is the shared history of every human being and every community, regardless of skin color or ancestry. In my view, the only way to move past that history is to treat each other fairly, as individuals, in a new society that rejects the old prejudices and addresses the problems we have today. If doing that is laughable as f*ck, then so be it.