Recent comments in /f/jerseycity

Nuplex t1_j9uyk7o wrote

Journal Square is changing rapidly so this is just silly.

Also how dare you imply Boulevard Drinks is anything but a cultural pillar for the city.

If you hate JC and never want anything to happen here just leave ¯\(ツ)

7

Miringanes t1_j9uycar wrote

I used to really like to do a figure 8, run up Newark, right onto Palisade, right onto Hoboken Ave, take Cole’s street to York, right onto Warren, left onto Dudley, run the waterfront till Columbus then up Columbus.

1

Nuplex t1_j9uxdy7 wrote

When there are no "luxury" containers for yuppies they just end up making our existing housing into luxury and pushing even more people out. This is what happened to San Francisco. Luxury housing is a necessity. Don't build it and things just get worse even faster. You can't stop yuppies from moving to JC. You can build them housing to keep them from making a 4th floor walk up studio in Greeneville $2500/month.

2

Nuplex t1_j9uw6qd wrote

I don't disagree with you on the build more housing or that landlords increase as much as they want.

However landlords do increase rent if their costs go up too. It's not mutually exclusive. They have a floor and ceiling. The ceiling is what you're talking about, they can and often will charge whatever the market will pay for. The floor is what they need to charge to break even. An increase in property tax and inflation raises this floor. So my og statement was basically that the floor increased around 7%, and the landlord increasing the ceiling side by 3% on top of that makes a 10% increase. It is a big increase but it is explainable with more than only "landlord bad". However an increase of say >10% is much more explainable by landlord greed than anything.

Also in case it sounds like it I do not support landlords in any way. But we should discuss things with nuance when it exists.

4

suu-solan OP t1_j9utvdb wrote

Reply to comment by imaluckyduckie in So WTF is this BS? by suu-solan

If I had to guess, since the police already ignore those tinted plate covers (which triggers another whole rant from me...) probably to hide it from any officers who might care to question this wildly illegal plate. Not saying it makes sense....

35

suu-solan OP t1_j9ut1qc wrote

Reply to comment by PoopFartPatrol in So WTF is this BS? by suu-solan

Well, instead of having a state-issued license plate identifying the car's owner, this person saw fit to mount this fake plate making it impossible to track them down in case of an accident or crime. Also, since this "New York" (maybe? who knows?) car was near the tunnel, I doubt its owner paid the toll if they traveled through it. Should be very illegal on several levels.

Also, if you were to be involved in an accident with this person, do you think they have insurance? Or any intention of even stopping to deal with it?

14

photo-smart t1_j9up77u wrote

Honestly I thought you were referring to a restaurant cause the point above it you mention Philippine Bread House, which is a restaurant, not a general area. But of course if I was talking to someone and they said Little India, then with context, I'd understand what they meant no problem.

Now, if somebody I was talking to said Curry Hill, then I would not understand what they meant lol. That sounds too weird to me, but whatever. I've never seen it in print either. Of course if you're saying that Indians that live there call it Curry Hill, then who am I to correct them. I guess I'm just not "in the know."

2