Recent comments in /f/jerseycity

PrincipleOfMoments t1_j61dx1f wrote

You're welcome. They can't do that unless you actively broke the appliance. I will say that even though the law is on your side, you might want to think about whether it is worth it to you to have to go to court to fight over getting back the cost of a microwave, etc. A lot of shady landlords withhold money from the security deposit that they know they shouldn't, but keep just enough so that fighting for it isn't worth your time.

3

PrincipleOfMoments t1_j6182if wrote

There is nothing illegal about any of these clauses, so if the Landlord can find someone willing to sign those terms, they will be enforceable. Your recourse is to try to negotiate for their removal or find another place to rent.

As for the specific clauses:

The Repair Clause is uncommon, because the cost of such repairs is a write off for the landlord and they usually pay for this stuff out of pocket so it is reflected in their taxes and then they increase the rent the next year to recoup their costs from the previous year. If you really love the apartment, then I suppose you can live with it, but only if you plan on staying more than a year. Otherwise, you're paying for repairs they should be making and leaving before they would have a chance to recoup in increased rent.

The Appliance Clause is outrageous. Absent your actively breaking appliances through negligent or intentional actions, these are the landlord's responsibility (damage due to normal wear and tear can't even be taken from your security deposit). If you can't take the appliances with you when you move out, you should not pay to replace them due to normal wear and tear. If you really love the apartment, you could guard against this by conducting a video inspection before move out to document that all appliances are working, but if they break before you move out, that won't help.

The Move In/Out Fees Clause is very common, almost universal in condos. You generally can't avoid this by bringing things in piecemeal, because the condo needs to know when your first day will be and will charge the fee automatically because damages can occur even if you're just carrying boxes, TVs, etc.

Bottom line - if you don't absolutely need this apartment, these lease terms probably aren't worth it.

4

drkensaccount t1_j6136re wrote

A plethora of rules is to be expected, but I've yet to hear an argument against letting them serve food. Yes, letting patrons bring in food or have it delivered would have been a good compromise, but only if there was any reason to not allow food service in the first place. Does anybody remember the rationalization behind the food service ban in the legalization bill? No homegrow is a terrible idea, but at least there's terrible logic behind it.

6

HobokenJ t1_j610c9l wrote

The mgt company doesn't do the actual maintenance--if they can be bothered, they make a call to one of their vendors (who invariably gives them a cut), and the tenant is then on their own. They'll likely be paying full freight for that minor (i.e., $400) plumbing repair.

1

AmputatorBot t1_j60u802 wrote

1