Recent comments in /f/jerseycity

photo-smart t1_j55dy6c wrote

I saw in a comment you're coming from downtown. The most straight forward way is to bike up Newark Ave and then turn right on Palisade. Newark Ave has a protected bike lane, so it's a safer ride, although you have to cycle up the hill. Palisade does not have a protected bike lane. It doesn't even have a separate bike lane. The "bike route" on Palisade is just sharing the one-lane road with cars. There are signs that say "Bike can use entire lane", or something like that, but the law is one thing, and people are something else.

Personally if I cycle from downtown up to heights, I prefer to turn right on Central Ave, not on Palisade. Palisade had too much road work done in the past and the road hasn't been repaved. I find Central Ave to be a smoother and safer ride (if you do choose to turn right on Central, ride on the sidewalk for the one block stretch from Newark to 139). Central doesn't have a separate bike lane, so you'll still have to share the one-lane road with cars. Personally, if there's traffic, I often ride slowly on the sidewalk.

Most roads in the Heights don't have a separate bike lane. None have a protected bike lane, as far as I know. Feel free to explore around the Heights. You can also cross into Union City if you want. If you have any of those cycling apps (Strava, Ride with GPS), I think you can see popular cycling routes that people take, so you can use those as a guide for where to cycle.

If you have difficulty cycling up the hill on Newark Ave, you could always use take the PATH from Grove to Journal Square. Both stations have elevators for your bike. If you do take the PATH, it can be a bit tricky to figure out how to enter/exit the stations with a bike, but once you know where to go, it's an easy option. And from JSQ cycle on Central into the Heights. Feel free to ask all of us if you have more questions. You should also follow BikeJC on instagram/whatever socials they have. I'm not involved with them, but they do great work.

8

fperrine t1_j55a7tb wrote

I see you're coming from downtown. Newark Ave hill has bike lanes on both sides. It's a healthy challenge. You can also go into Hoboken and take New York Ave (I thought it used to be Ravine, so that's confusing) or Mountain Rd. The latter is the steeper of all these options, but it also has a large staircase as well. And if you really want to head through HBK, the 9th Street Lightrail stop has an elevator that goes up the cliff. There is also technically the 14th Street viaduct, but I personally only go down it, not up, for safety concerns.

9

iSkyscraper t1_j55933k wrote

This is an easy one. Cities like New York learned long ago that you cannot maintain grass without management in dense urban areas. Dogs especially destroy open lawns, but so do all kinds of heavy use, especially in the off-season.

If you look at spaces like Madison Square Park, the grass is entirely fenced off with mesh and stakes and specific gates are opened (and rotated) to enable use of the lawn at appropriate times. Hamilton Park lacks those barriers and this is the result.

10

pixel_of_moral_decay t1_j555zaj wrote

NJ is pretty sensible for the most part.

NJ’s objection to congestion pricing is largely that it’s a tax on NJ while we still have to donate billions to the MTA via federal tax dollars. On top of that NY has been absolutely obstructionist in mass transit between states. They torpedoed the ARC project for new tunnels by capping what they’d contribute to the project and spent decades fighting replacing port authority bus terminal. Even with a new terminal proposed it’s still not as big as NJ wants so it can have more buses. Which is presumably so it doesn’t eat away at congestion pricing revenue, because they’d have to make up the losses via other taxes or program cuts.

NYC pretends to be much more pro transit than it really is. It’s mostly a tax grift.

Could have had new tunnels for NJ Transit and a massively expanded bus system. But NYC shot that down. Don’t forget that.

2

moobycow OP t1_j555623 wrote

I think it's a good idea, I'd love to see it, but if enough people supported Leonia then that should have been a catalyst to get something done, it wasn't.

NJ is a car first state, we can't agree that congestion pricing into NYC is a good idea and our Gov and other state politicians are trying to widen a highway through a city with no pushback from anyone outside JC.

We can't get state and county roads to have any design other than 'more room for cars', the State DOT is actively antagonistic to complete streets in towns.

I hope/wish you are correct that this is something that could get done, but I don't see it.

3

mickyrow42 t1_j554jkr wrote

> …most of the trees in Hamilton Park are suffering from serious issues that either indicate or significantly impact their overall health and condition. Almost every tree exhibits some degree of fungal infection, a number of trees have open cavities and cankers, and both girdling roots and root rot symptoms have been observed.

ewww our trees have cankers. after skimming this report I guess just be glad there’s any living plant life. Also watch out for falling diseased branches.

5