Recent comments in /f/history

drgonzo90 t1_izs9ya5 wrote

Not sure if this is exactly the history you wanted, but here's a quote from Robert Caro's biography of Lyndon Johnson:

“During the 1930s, the federal government sent physicians to examine a sampling of Hill Country women. The doctors found that, out of 275 Hill Country women, 158 had perineal tears,” Caro says, citing the the results of a study that noted, “many of them third-degree ‘tears so bad that is difficult to see how they stand on their feet.’”

I'm not sure how/if you'd be able to find the original study, but it sounds like at least in this area of Texas the midwives weren't doing any stitching.

140

musiccitymegan t1_izrswtq wrote

You might find something on that in this book about the history of c-sections. It goes into a lot of detail about the changing field of surgery in general and how that intersects with the shift from female to male providers being in charge of birth. I wish I could be more specific but I don't have a copy of the book in front of me.

Good luck! It's a fascinating and disturbing history. I'd love to hear more about what you find.

165

the_turn t1_izrn2f9 wrote

The guy was clearly replying only to the comment and not to the article humorously.

Western funereal practices with which I am familiar (admittedly only a subset of Western practices, and an even smaller subset of global practices) all include the application of make up in both living and dead contexts, and that was all the comment that was being replied to specified.

The comment mentioned nothing about the nature of the specific practices.

5

Gimpknee t1_izrkf9p wrote

The last native Pharaoh was Nectanebo II, overthrown by about 343-341 BCE as a result of the Persian conquest, the King of Persia would then be crowned Pharaoh until Alexander conquered Egypt from the Persians in 332 BCE. Alexander died in 323 BCE and, following the wars of his successors, Ptolemy, a Macedonian Greek general, took over Egypt and created an ethnically Greek ruling dynasty that ended in 30 BCE with the death of Cleopatra. Egypt was then incorporated into the Roman Empire, and Emperors were seen as Pharaohs until Daza died in 313 CE.

6

lsspam t1_izrhndu wrote

That’s a reason India was more profitable longterm than America. What it doesn’t say is “Britain devoted more resources to losing the second Mysore war than losing the Revolutionary war”….

…because they didn’t. In fact it wasn’t even close.

1

Xyleksoll t1_izrf40v wrote

...and I quote: "Consider the economics of Britain’s calculus. The raw goods to manufactured goods trade with the American colonies was profitable (North America accounted for thirty percent of English exports[15]), but it didn’t compare with the potential for gains in the East. Defending America had gotten expensive, as the Seven Years’ War showed, and the colonists were evidently unhappy to pay for that defense. In contrast, the colonial government in India made substantial revenue from taxes on Indians, and the goods traded, including but hardly limited to spices, were valuable. England was undergoing the agricultural and then the industrial revolutions; a growing market to sell goods was not overseas but right at home. This de-emphasized the market for exports, America, in favor of the source of imports, Asia."

2