Recent comments in /f/history
GiraffePolka t1_izs9m37 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in A question on the history of perineal stitches after giving birth by Endorion
Usually a husband stitch means painful sex for the woman, sometimes to the point where they can no longer have sex or enjoy it.
superspiffyusername t1_izs86qv wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in A question on the history of perineal stitches after giving birth by Endorion
Was it better for her, though?
[deleted] t1_izs7jq8 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in A question on the history of perineal stitches after giving birth by Endorion
[removed]
[deleted] t1_izs6g1h wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in A question on the history of perineal stitches after giving birth by Endorion
[removed]
[deleted] t1_izs601j wrote
Reply to comment by LittleGravitasIndeed in A question on the history of perineal stitches after giving birth by Endorion
[removed]
LittleGravitasIndeed t1_izs2p5c wrote
Reply to comment by NoHandBananaNo in A question on the history of perineal stitches after giving birth by Endorion
Fair, but they have lawyers and money is fungible. Your meat suit bits are much less so.
NoHandBananaNo t1_izrzamb wrote
Reply to comment by LittleGravitasIndeed in A question on the history of perineal stitches after giving birth by Endorion
It's medical malpractice so you should also mention the lawsuits and complaints to licensing board that you will visit upon them as well.
LittleGravitasIndeed t1_izrud7t wrote
This is interesting! I’ve already let my husband know that I’m relying on him to honestly communicate the amount of physical violence I will visit upon someone who tries a “husband stitch” on me. His fast talking will keep their body whole.
[deleted] t1_izrt41n wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in The Japanese cigarette brand weaponised against Chinese smokers in wartime by zhumao
[removed]
musiccitymegan t1_izrswtq wrote
You might find something on that in this book about the history of c-sections. It goes into a lot of detail about the changing field of surgery in general and how that intersects with the shift from female to male providers being in charge of birth. I wish I could be more specific but I don't have a copy of the book in front of me.
Good luck! It's a fascinating and disturbing history. I'd love to hear more about what you find.
Apprehensive_World10 t1_izrqfx3 wrote
Reply to comment by Scarlett_Blaze in The Magic of Makeup: How Ancient Egyptians Used Cosmetics for More Than Just Beauty by StationFrosty
They were not black africans, apart from the 25th dinasty, the nubian one, that didn't last long. Otherwise pharaos were like we can see today from the mummies, pictures on the ancient walls and statues
Pathfinder6 t1_izrpj2c wrote
Reply to comment by StationFrosty in The Magic of Makeup: How Ancient Egyptians Used Cosmetics for More Than Just Beauty by StationFrosty
Like Charlize Theron and Elon Musk are African-Americans.
Funky_Fishy t1_izrpfzb wrote
Reply to comment by DonkeyDonRulz in Bookclub Wednesday! by AutoModerator
Thank you very much, this is exactly what I needed! The link is also very nice, might have to check out some of the other books on there as well
the_turn t1_izrn2f9 wrote
Reply to comment by RiceAlicorn in The Magic of Makeup: How Ancient Egyptians Used Cosmetics for More Than Just Beauty by StationFrosty
The guy was clearly replying only to the comment and not to the article humorously.
Western funereal practices with which I am familiar (admittedly only a subset of Western practices, and an even smaller subset of global practices) all include the application of make up in both living and dead contexts, and that was all the comment that was being replied to specified.
The comment mentioned nothing about the nature of the specific practices.
Incantanto t1_izrmbe0 wrote
Reply to comment by StationFrosty in The Magic of Makeup: How Ancient Egyptians Used Cosmetics for More Than Just Beauty by StationFrosty
It was used on the dead, not by them
The dead did not apply it themselves
Gimpknee t1_izrkf9p wrote
Reply to comment by Scarlett_Blaze in The Magic of Makeup: How Ancient Egyptians Used Cosmetics for More Than Just Beauty by StationFrosty
The last native Pharaoh was Nectanebo II, overthrown by about 343-341 BCE as a result of the Persian conquest, the King of Persia would then be crowned Pharaoh until Alexander conquered Egypt from the Persians in 332 BCE. Alexander died in 323 BCE and, following the wars of his successors, Ptolemy, a Macedonian Greek general, took over Egypt and created an ethnically Greek ruling dynasty that ended in 30 BCE with the death of Cleopatra. Egypt was then incorporated into the Roman Empire, and Emperors were seen as Pharaohs until Daza died in 313 CE.
[deleted] t1_izrk3j5 wrote
Reply to comment by LovesGettingRandomPm in The Magic of Makeup: How Ancient Egyptians Used Cosmetics for More Than Just Beauty by StationFrosty
[removed]
lsspam t1_izrhndu wrote
Reply to comment by Xyleksoll in Why is the Spanish colonial empire often said/implied to be "less focused on trade" or "not prioritising trade" compared to other empires like the Dutch, British, Portuguese etc.? by raori921
That’s a reason India was more profitable longterm than America. What it doesn’t say is “Britain devoted more resources to losing the second Mysore war than losing the Revolutionary war”….
…because they didn’t. In fact it wasn’t even close.
[deleted] t1_izrhf6e wrote
[removed]
Xyleksoll t1_izrf40v wrote
Reply to comment by lsspam in Why is the Spanish colonial empire often said/implied to be "less focused on trade" or "not prioritising trade" compared to other empires like the Dutch, British, Portuguese etc.? by raori921
...and I quote: "Consider the economics of Britain’s calculus. The raw goods to manufactured goods trade with the American colonies was profitable (North America accounted for thirty percent of English exports[15]), but it didn’t compare with the potential for gains in the East. Defending America had gotten expensive, as the Seven Years’ War showed, and the colonists were evidently unhappy to pay for that defense. In contrast, the colonial government in India made substantial revenue from taxes on Indians, and the goods traded, including but hardly limited to spices, were valuable. England was undergoing the agricultural and then the industrial revolutions; a growing market to sell goods was not overseas but right at home. This de-emphasized the market for exports, America, in favor of the source of imports, Asia."
enternationalist t1_izrezbr wrote
Reply to comment by RoofORead in The Magic of Makeup: How Ancient Egyptians Used Cosmetics for More Than Just Beauty by StationFrosty
The ancient egyptians seem to have used galena to make kohl, which is lead(II) sulfide.
enternationalist t1_izreny3 wrote
Reply to comment by aisha_so_sweet in The Magic of Makeup: How Ancient Egyptians Used Cosmetics for More Than Just Beauty by StationFrosty
To anyone thinking of picking up some kohl, do look out for lead content;
Dukesphone t1_izrcne2 wrote
Reply to comment by Scarlett_Blaze in The Magic of Makeup: How Ancient Egyptians Used Cosmetics for More Than Just Beauty by StationFrosty
The Ptolemaic Dynasty (Cleopatra) were Macedonian Greeks
drgonzo90 t1_izs9ya5 wrote
Reply to A question on the history of perineal stitches after giving birth by Endorion
Not sure if this is exactly the history you wanted, but here's a quote from Robert Caro's biography of Lyndon Johnson:
“During the 1930s, the federal government sent physicians to examine a sampling of Hill Country women. The doctors found that, out of 275 Hill Country women, 158 had perineal tears,” Caro says, citing the the results of a study that noted, “many of them third-degree ‘tears so bad that is difficult to see how they stand on their feet.’”
I'm not sure how/if you'd be able to find the original study, but it sounds like at least in this area of Texas the midwives weren't doing any stitching.