Recent comments in /f/history
mushinnoshit t1_j2octx6 wrote
Reply to comment by bayesian13 in In 1930s, Music Defense League launched a campaign against recorded sound in movie and live theaters, claiming that numerous musicians would lose their jobs if "canned music" was preferred over live recordings. by Profanion
Yeah I watched It Follows with Disasterpeace doing a live accompaniment in the cinema, it was pretty epic
PizzaQuest420 t1_j2oct9y wrote
Reply to In 1930s, Music Defense League launched a campaign against recorded sound in movie and live theaters, claiming that numerous musicians would lose their jobs if "canned music" was preferred over live recordings. by Profanion
obviously that is a true statement, the live theater band gig is dead, but they didn't taken into account that as movies became more popular, the amount of movies playing in theaters at any time of day meant there was no way live bands could cover all the screenings. they also didn't realize that audible spoken dialogue would be absolutely crucial to the modern movie experience (for the past ~95 years). recorded sound was inevitable in the evolution of movies as pop culture.
unshavenbeardo64 t1_j2occag wrote
Reply to comment by saltyDragonfly in In 1930s, Music Defense League launched a campaign against recorded sound in movie and live theaters, claiming that numerous musicians would lose their jobs if "canned music" was preferred over live recordings. by Profanion
Now i see an orchestra running through high grass and being picked out one by one by a pack of Velociraptors.
PizzaQuest420 t1_j2obr2f wrote
Reply to comment by Profanion in In 1930s, Music Defense League launched a campaign against recorded sound in movie and live theaters, claiming that numerous musicians would lose their jobs if "canned music" was preferred over live recordings. by Profanion
fair enough, but they didn't taken into account that audible spoken dialogue would be absolutely crucial to the modern movie experience for the past 90 years. and the amount of movies playing in theaters at any time of day meant there was no way live bands could cover all the screenings.
Regret_the_Van t1_j2obct6 wrote
Reply to comment by amitrion in In 1930s, Music Defense League launched a campaign against recorded sound in movie and live theaters, claiming that numerous musicians would lose their jobs if "canned music" was preferred over live recordings. by Profanion
Milwaukee Symphony Orchestra did one this past weekend with Ghostbusters as the movie they were playing to. I didn't know about it until it was too late because it sounded fun AF
saltyDragonfly t1_j2oastg wrote
Reply to comment by amitrion in In 1930s, Music Defense League launched a campaign against recorded sound in movie and live theaters, claiming that numerous musicians would lose their jobs if "canned music" was preferred over live recordings. by Profanion
Saw Jurassic Park with a live orchestra in the states, its awesome.
macbeezy_ t1_j2oamty wrote
Reply to comment by Vegan_Harvest in In 1930s, Music Defense League launched a campaign against recorded sound in movie and live theaters, claiming that numerous musicians would lose their jobs if "canned music" was preferred over live recordings. by Profanion
There’s a Star Wars symphony I desperately want to see. They play the music live and it’s a bucket list of mine.
speaks_truth_2_kiwis t1_j2o9cpr wrote
Reply to comment by Vegan_Harvest in In 1930s, Music Defense League launched a campaign against recorded sound in movie and live theaters, claiming that numerous musicians would lose their jobs if "canned music" was preferred over live recordings. by Profanion
>Well they weren't wrong, I've never been to a movie with a live band.
How about a live recording?
daredeviline t1_j2o7n31 wrote
Reply to comment by amitrion in In 1930s, Music Defense League launched a campaign against recorded sound in movie and live theaters, claiming that numerous musicians would lose their jobs if "canned music" was preferred over live recordings. by Profanion
It definitely does happen in the US. I live in Cincinnati and they had a lord of the rings one a few years ago. Keep your eye out!
kevronwithTechron t1_j2o74y4 wrote
Reply to comment by Zinjifrah in In 1930s, Music Defense League launched a campaign against recorded sound in movie and live theaters, claiming that numerous musicians would lose their jobs if "canned music" was preferred over live recordings. by Profanion
I think that's a little different. With video technology there's no need to go buy theater tickets for a show. The entire industry is already obsolete to begin with.
kevronwithTechron t1_j2o6t2m wrote
Reply to comment by DreadPirateGriswold in In 1930s, Music Defense League launched a campaign against recorded sound in movie and live theaters, claiming that numerous musicians would lose their jobs if "canned music" was preferred over live recordings. by Profanion
Might as well just record the stage performers on video as well. Maybe they can make one definitive video cut and stream it to my house so I can watch it in my pajamas.
That's kind of an odd place to use recorded music. If I'm paying the outrageous price to see a live Broadway show I'd want to hear live music.
amitrion t1_j2o6srl wrote
Reply to comment by cainmarko in In 1930s, Music Defense League launched a campaign against recorded sound in movie and live theaters, claiming that numerous musicians would lose their jobs if "canned music" was preferred over live recordings. by Profanion
Holy cow! This is a thing?! I want to go... sadly, not in the US. Arrg
ARedLemming t1_j2o6lzm wrote
Reply to In 1930s, Music Defense League launched a campaign against recorded sound in movie and live theaters, claiming that numerous musicians would lose their jobs if "canned music" was preferred over live recordings. by Profanion
What a double standard regarding their position on music in films. They were keen to exploit a medium that put actors out of work (according to their logic) yet protested when the same process was applied to them.
QuestioningEspecialy t1_j2o6jyv wrote
Reply to In 1930s, Music Defense League launched a campaign against recorded sound in movie and live theaters, claiming that numerous musicians would lose their jobs if "canned music" was preferred over live recordings. by Profanion
Is all discussion centered around AI art in relation to this being deleted?
GoofAckYoorsElf t1_j2o5j6c wrote
Reply to comment by DreadPirateGriswold in In 1930s, Music Defense League launched a campaign against recorded sound in movie and live theaters, claiming that numerous musicians would lose their jobs if "canned music" was preferred over live recordings. by Profanion
This argument continues everywhere where new principles, techniques and technologies emerge, and people only see the dangers for themselves, not the benefits for everyone including themselves.
Amaranth_devil t1_j2o5agk wrote
Amaranth_devil t1_j2o4pg0 wrote
Reply to comment by bayesian13 in In 1930s, Music Defense League launched a campaign against recorded sound in movie and live theaters, claiming that numerous musicians would lose their jobs if "canned music" was preferred over live recordings. by Profanion
This is so awesome! I cannot believe that I'm this many years old before finding out that this exists!
mouse6502 t1_j2o4oj3 wrote
Reply to comment by Vegan_Harvest in In 1930s, Music Defense League launched a campaign against recorded sound in movie and live theaters, claiming that numerous musicians would lose their jobs if "canned music" was preferred over live recordings. by Profanion
Oh definitely check that out. They do a back To The Future one and play over the entire movie, Silvestri’s score pops!!!
Riversntallbuildings t1_j2nzyll wrote
Reply to In 1930s, Music Defense League launched a campaign against recorded sound in movie and live theaters, claiming that numerous musicians would lose their jobs if "canned music" was preferred over live recordings. by Profanion
History doesn’t repeat itself, but it does rhyme.
Zinjifrah t1_j2nzmpo wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in In 1930s, Music Defense League launched a campaign against recorded sound in movie and live theaters, claiming that numerous musicians would lose their jobs if "canned music" was preferred over live recordings. by Profanion
Aren't you literally making the same argument as the musicians for movies?
Misuzuzu t1_j2nyp1h wrote
Reply to comment by BrokenEye3 in In 1930s, Music Defense League launched a campaign against recorded sound in movie and live theaters, claiming that numerous musicians would lose their jobs if "canned music" was preferred over live recordings. by Profanion
I once saw a screening of Harry Potter accompanied by a live orchestra.
sluuuurp t1_j2oee01 wrote
Reply to comment by DreadPirateGriswold in In 1930s, Music Defense League launched a campaign against recorded sound in movie and live theaters, claiming that numerous musicians would lose their jobs if "canned music" was preferred over live recordings. by Profanion
It might be more emotional because you know there are humans performing it.
But I doubt you could identify it as more emotional in a blind sound test. The sound is recorded with the same microphones and is played through the same speakers, it will sound identical in both cases. (This is assuming that most seats hear sound from speakers rather than from the instruments directly, which I believe is a fair assumption for most seats in most broadway theaters.)
This is basically the same idea as why people go to see the real Mona Lisa rather than a reprint. It looks 100% identical in every way, but knowing that it’s the real thing rather than a reproduction makes a difference anyway.