Recent comments in /f/history
akodo1 t1_j20i5kt wrote
Reply to comment by greennitit in Why didn't the US adopt the STG-44 after WW2? by TurboTortois3
Don't forget, each military from WW1 onwards faced the question: do I get the cartridge that is GREAT in the medium machingun but recoil heavily in the individual rifle or reverse that.
akodo1 t1_j20g2ff wrote
What could the stg-44 do that an m1 carbine upgraded to full auto couldn't do?
Remember, pre. WW2 the military was looking at M1 garands in less potent calibers as well as with detachable higher capacity box magazines. They thought that troops would be wasteful of ammo, loose the mags and that would be expensive, and felt that they wanted a very long reaching cartridge
akodo1 t1_j20fcbw wrote
Lot to unpack here.
Swords were more expensive/difficult to make than a spear, but there were cheap and poorly made vs very well made using the best iron/steel, best hardening technology, etc. And they tended to last. Hence they were very prolific.
Also, what was actually associated with knights and knighthood? Golden spurs is what people from medieval to late rennisance most associated with knights, second the horse, third the lance (especially look at the terms used for knights and those non-knights that were similarly armed. It's literally Lancer in many cases, horseman in others)
The sword gets a boost in relevance because a big part of knighthood was supposed to be vows, keeping your word, etc. The sword was a great stand-in for a crucifix
It's only modern pop culture that associates sword with knighthood. And that's because it makes a much better movie prop than a horse or a lance
virtualmang t1_j20et2w wrote
Reply to comment by pseudocrat_ in People 'finger painted' the skulls of their ancestors red in the Andes a millennium ago by limpy992
What’s the name for something a million years ago?
Edit: Nothing in that naming scheme. But the closest thing is an Epoch which describes a 1 million year period. Aeon is 1 billion.
akodo1 t1_j20dj88 wrote
Reply to If the Sami are considered the only indigenous group left in the European Union, what are the Karelians? by Theworldsfuckedm8
It's sloppy terminology. By Sami they mean "ethic groups associated with the finnic-uralic languages, of which the Sami are the most well known"
akodo1 t1_j20cwc9 wrote
Reply to Historical accuracy, Frontier House by BrightEyEz703
Not even unworked, it means untiled land. Land that has never felt the plow. So it's entirely accurate.
elmonoenano t1_j2001f0 wrote
Reply to comment by Bashstash01 in Simple/Short/Silly History Questions Saturday! by AutoModerator
Not a housekeeper. They were excluded from FLSA, along with agricultural workers. Housekeepers got FLSA protections in 1974. I'm not sure agricultural workers have them yet. I think most ag worker protections are under state law.
elmonoenano t1_j1zzlkl wrote
Reply to comment by No-Objective-Today in Simple/Short/Silly History Questions Saturday! by AutoModerator
Besides the Paxton book the other poster mentioned, I'd check out Ruth Ben-Ghiat's book, Fascist Modernities.
JegElskerGud t1_j1zy793 wrote
Reply to comment by ConsitutionalHistory in If the Sami are considered the only indigenous group left in the European Union, what are the Karelians? by Theworldsfuckedm8
That would make me technically correct not technically wrong. And if mankind came from Africa then Africa belongs to people of all races as a motherland.
McGillis_is_a_Char t1_j1zx81u wrote
Reply to Bookclub Wednesday! by AutoModerator
Could anyone recommend a modern history of Venice? I am reading John Julius Norwich's history, but it is a bit aged (ie uses the blanket term Saracens for all Muslims during the Crusades), and feels like it lacks objectivity on the subject.
Also if any could suggest a book on Eastern Mediterranean diplomacy and spycraft of the Renaissance I would appreciate the suggestion.
Theworldsfuckedm8 OP t1_j1ztrth wrote
Reply to comment by JegElskerGud in If the Sami are considered the only indigenous group left in the European Union, what are the Karelians? by Theworldsfuckedm8
Funnily enough it’s actually a Finnish government article so more so should make reference to the Karelians
Theworldsfuckedm8 OP t1_j1ztl8j wrote
Reply to comment by JegElskerGud in If the Sami are considered the only indigenous group left in the European Union, what are the Karelians? by Theworldsfuckedm8
It’s not that I don’t agree with what you’re saying, it’s just the original post I’m referring to makes reference to the European Union
[deleted] t1_j1zjy93 wrote
[removed]
derekr49 t1_j1zi5os wrote
Reply to People 'finger painted' the skulls of their ancestors red in the Andes a millennium ago by limpy992
Kid Named Finger?
[deleted] t1_j1zhxz7 wrote
Reply to comment by CruelFish in People 'finger painted' the skulls of their ancestors red in the Andes a millennium ago by limpy992
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j1zetaz wrote
Reply to comment by HVAC_and_Rum in People 'finger painted' the skulls of their ancestors red in the Andes a millennium ago by limpy992
[removed]
ConsitutionalHistory t1_j1zd9s0 wrote
Reply to comment by JegElskerGud in If the Sami are considered the only indigenous group left in the European Union, what are the Karelians? by Theworldsfuckedm8
Technically you're wrong...one could reasonably argue that a given black person in and around certain parts of Africa could claim to be the only true indigenous people on the planet.
[deleted] t1_j1zcw4p wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in People 'finger painted' the skulls of their ancestors red in the Andes a millennium ago by limpy992
[removed]
bangdazap t1_j1z5smm wrote
Reply to comment by No-Objective-Today in Simple/Short/Silly History Questions Saturday! by AutoModerator
The Anatomy of Fascism by Robert Paxton.
Ranger176 t1_j1z41jh wrote
Reply to Bookclub Wednesday! by AutoModerator
Currently reading Michael Holt’s By One Vote about the 1876 presidential election. The University of Kansas has a whole series on the presidential elections and so far I love it. I’ve found a new respect for Rutherford Hayes and I’ve already ordered Holt’s other book on the 1860 election.
I don’t know if I’ll ever publish my 2022 book reviews since I haven’t found the motivation to write lately. Maybe I’ll get around to it in the New Year. Question for the sub, what books did you get for the holidays?
[deleted] t1_j1z1tnw wrote
[deleted] t1_j1yzbxi wrote
No-Objective-Today t1_j1yza0g wrote
Any books you recommend to understand the ideology of fascism?
[deleted] t1_j1yyv9k wrote
Reply to comment by Liztliss in People 'finger painted' the skulls of their ancestors red in the Andes a millennium ago by limpy992
[removed]
akodo1 t1_j20jln4 wrote
Reply to comment by fiendishrabbit in Why didn't the US adopt the STG-44 after WW2? by TurboTortois3
And there countyside is different. Sparce vegetation on flat terrain or scrub brush on mountains means a lot more long shot possiblity (as well as long range machinegunnery) that was experienced in Vietnam or the conflicts in Latin America