Recent comments in /f/headphones

Mr-Zero-Fucks t1_j6o6we8 wrote

Nothing in the headphones

But try to keep your sessions at normal levels or your ears may develop Tinnitus. Quiet environments, good isolation, or noise cancelling are better ways to improve your listening experience than turning the volume up.

Also remember, good equalization is about turning the annoying frequencies down, not pumping the good ones up.

14

anaf28 t1_j6o4hp8 wrote

Not only do you have a new mobo and a cheap dac/amp so there shouldn’t be a difference, but you’re also using a gaming headset which in my personal experience doesn’t scale with anything. I’m more blown away by your experience than you are lol, but if it makes sense to you then that’s all that matters.

1

69001001011 t1_j6o41m8 wrote

It's not. I wasn't a huge fan of the tuning, but my main issue is that it has an audible noise floor.

Basically you plug it in and it starts going shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Great bargain, but not a replacement for anything high end

10

MachineTeaching t1_j6o3nqb wrote

Any technical improvements between something like the BTR3 and a "better" one like the Qudelix disappear thanks to Bluetooth compression anyway. They are very, very minor at the best of times even when wired.

As far as IEMs go, something like the Moondrop Blessing 2 will blow your SE535 out of the water and provide a significant upgrade.

1

CraigMcMurtry t1_j6o3b2b wrote

Take a look at a massively expensive Stereophile-recommend amplifier, or pre-amp/power amp combo. It will have a headphone jack & zero EQ knobs, with an option for Dirac room correction, because sound does bounce off walls. So, you can spend a car’s worth amount of money on a dream audio system and have nothing in that system for EQing your headphones. EQ is viable when the source is a PC, Mac or Android phone, or an iOS device playing downloaded files … and that’s it. That should tell u everything u need to know about EQ: don’t bother.

−12

vext01 t1_j6o2rl6 wrote

Agreed. If you enumerate the usb interfaces it exposes, often there's a serial endpoint for debugging and firmware update. Might be able to get the firmware that way, but after that you just have a binary blob.

Didn't know about pinebuds. Sounds neat.

24

pinkcunt123 t1_j6o1q7l wrote

"Designed to perform closely to Harman"?

Like the DT 990 pro and the 1770 pro and the HEDDphone or the Neumann NDH20/30? Because they are so close to Harman, right???

Pro headphones have nothing to do with Harman compliance. They all follow a different "target", which depends on the whim of the engineers.

I think you've missed something in your analysis: Headphones, which actually adhere to the Harman target are few and far between.

It sounds to me as though you give to much credit to "pro" audio manufacturers.

3

Dionysiac_Thinker t1_j6nzt3m wrote

As long as you buy from reputable and transparent companies you’ll get products that are designed to perform very closely to the Harman curve and minimal distortion/modulation whether that’s the ā€œidealā€ curve is debatable ofcourse.

People often argue with ā€œoh but you can EQ other non-professional brands to the harman curve at wellā€, but you’ll need to take in account the sudden cup resonances and driver limits and air pressure (think lower frequencies) issues you’ll be inevitably running into.

In the end graphs aren’t everything as seal, materials, drivers, angles, damping, pressures, air dissipation, resonances etc. all play a part in it, don’t even get me started on how complex good speakers can be.

1