Recent comments in /f/gadgets

zoyolin t1_j3o8512 wrote

How crazy?! Apple really does hype up the current technology to make it sound astonishing!!! Whao

(So bluetooth and wifi are already on the same frequency band and devices do make them cohabit on the same antenna. Cellular has a different rf need, therefore a different antenna and also tries to be located at the other side of the device. So a different modem to drive the antenna makes sense.)

53

chevalerisation_2323 t1_j3o5lir wrote

>This isn't about improving products, this is about production of more raspberry pis.

Which why I said "are all constantly improving their productions". I'm talking about production, not products https://www.dictionary.com/browse/production

>On the other hand, you believe that the Pi foundation should shutdown all other divisions, all development of different products, future products, etc., if it means they can get one more single raspberry pi fabricated even if it costs millions and the company goes under. That's your take.

That's not my take. My take is very simple: The funds used to launch the camera (from RnD to productions to marketing etc) should have been used to accelerate the production of raspberry pi instead.

You're the one arguing that accelerating that production is impossible.

Just read the chain of comments. It's exactly your take. Your putting words into your own mouth.

I just have a different budgeting priority, which happens all the time, and for some reason you're butthurt about that.

I don't care if we don't have the same budgeting priorities, but saying my priorities don't work because improving production isn't possible ("but but but what can they do?!" ) , is an ignorant take.

2

NotAHost t1_j3o3tgx wrote

>Every tech companies, from Apple to IBM to Razers to Intel to Sennheiser etc etc etc are all constantly improving their productions, but Raspberry pi actually have it perfect and nothing could be improved. That's your take.

This isn't about improving products, this is about production of more raspberry pis. If you want to put words in my mouth, fine, let me return the favor.

You believe that the Pi foundation should shutdown all other divisions, all development of different products, future products, etc., if it means they can get one more single raspberry pi fabricated even if it costs millions and the company goes under. That's your take.

4

chevalerisation_2323 t1_j3nw3vt wrote

> You're also missing the point. The camera budget was likely independent of the production budget.

It's not. It comes out of the same budget overrall.

> it is unlikely to have had an impact on production over the last two years.

Once again you're implying that Raspberry Pi management is perfect and that no amount of additionnal work hours/budget could improve, even slightly, the situation. That's just wrong.

Look, take 15 minutes and introspect that your POV is that nothing could be done to improve (even just a little bit) the production of Pis, not now not later. You're arguing that the incredibly complex and numerous steps of bringing a product like a Raspberry pi to consumers (from R&D to manufacturing to suppliers etc) can't, in anyways or form, be improved, even slightly.

Every tech companies, from Apple to IBM to Razers to Intel to Sennheiser etc etc etc are all constantly improving their productions, but Raspberry pi actually have it perfect and nothing could be improved. That's your take.

1