Recent comments in /f/gadgets
doxx_in_the_box t1_j38tado wrote
Reply to comment by xShooK in Qualcomm partners with Iridium to bring satellite messaging to Android phones by thebelsnickle1991
As in Android devices on T-Mobile network? Don’t ask me why people were making the false claims.
HiddenEmu t1_j38t5qk wrote
Reply to Qualcomm partners with Iridium to bring satellite messaging to Android phones by thebelsnickle1991
Our local highway lacks cell coverage for the majority of it. Accidents turn deadly because the environment is harsh and you can't call for help without a satellite phone.
In our area (BC, Highway 16, West from Smithers onwards). Improved cell coverage on the highway is a talking point and stuff like this will help.
doxx_in_the_box t1_j38t2z6 wrote
Reply to comment by ahecht in Qualcomm partners with Iridium to bring satellite messaging to Android phones by thebelsnickle1991
Latency = speed if you’re talking about how quickly a message is delivered, aka how quickly it reaches emergency services on the ground
eric987235 t1_j38sw42 wrote
Reply to Qualcomm partners with Iridium to bring satellite messaging to Android phones by thebelsnickle1991
Iridium? There’s a name I haven’t heard in a long time! I figured they went under back in the early 2000’s.
ahecht t1_j38s1pz wrote
Reply to comment by doxx_in_the_box in Qualcomm partners with Iridium to bring satellite messaging to Android phones by thebelsnickle1991
You're confusing speed with latency.
xShooK t1_j38r3os wrote
Reply to comment by doxx_in_the_box in Qualcomm partners with Iridium to bring satellite messaging to Android phones by thebelsnickle1991
What does Elon have to do with Android?
AromaticIce9 t1_j38j0ee wrote
Reply to comment by QueensGambit36 in Qualcomm partners with Iridium to bring satellite messaging to Android phones by thebelsnickle1991
Shit like this is gonna save so many lives.
I'm all for satellite connected phones. In every way. Connect to all of them. Iridium, Starlink, whatever the fuck apple's working on.
Brieble t1_j38hzid wrote
Reply to Qualcomm partners with Iridium to bring satellite messaging to Android phones by thebelsnickle1991
So after that, Android users can claim that Android dit it years before Apple /s
Schwifty0V0 t1_j38hmhn wrote
Reply to Qualcomm partners with Iridium to bring satellite messaging to Android phones by thebelsnickle1991
sigh opens up Stardew
Dark-X t1_j38g6w9 wrote
Reply to comment by CoderDevo in Asus brings glasses-free 3D to OLED laptops | High-specced workstations target professionals who want to work with 3D. by chrisdh79
They both drive you places
SIXTYNlNE t1_j38fmue wrote
Reply to Asus brings glasses-free 3D to OLED laptops | High-specced workstations target professionals who want to work with 3D. by chrisdh79
Nintendo 3ds did this years ago
MrChip53 t1_j38eode wrote
Reply to comment by Neo_Techni in Qualcomm partners with Iridium to bring satellite messaging to Android phones by thebelsnickle1991
frostrogue117 t1_j38en7y wrote
Reply to Qualcomm partners with Iridium to bring satellite messaging to Android phones by thebelsnickle1991
As someone who’s worked with Iridium, yikes.
bergsteroj t1_j38egm2 wrote
Reply to comment by damifynoU in Qualcomm partners with Iridium to bring satellite messaging to Android phones by thebelsnickle1991
It was Motorola who was going to crash the satellites rather than keep maintaining them. They spent tons of money develop h the system for the completely wrong market (which was completely taken over by widespread cell phones).
Iridium is the name of the satellite constellation as well as the company that was eventually formed to save the satellites (was a mess getting funding and insurance agreements that Motorola would accept). The system is still highly used for remote wildness communication (such as Garmin InReach), satellite phones by military and other expeditionary groups, and making inroads to take marker share from companies like IMARSAT for cruise ships and airlines.
The satellites are still very much functioning and in use and new ones being launched.
doxx_in_the_box t1_j38e54p wrote
Reply to comment by wgc123 in Qualcomm partners with Iridium to bring satellite messaging to Android phones by thebelsnickle1991
Probably because Elon said he would use existing T-Mobile bands, and phrased it as if it’s already working
Neo_Techni t1_j38dvga wrote
Reply to comment by MrChip53 in Qualcomm partners with Iridium to bring satellite messaging to Android phones by thebelsnickle1991
Space is. Earth orbit isn't
QueensGambit36 t1_j38drm4 wrote
Reply to comment by ramriot in Qualcomm partners with Iridium to bring satellite messaging to Android phones by thebelsnickle1991
The nice thing about this is that it won't require a new device to use either. Since they are using PCS spectrum just about any device will be able to connect and use it.
doxx_in_the_box t1_j38drfl wrote
Reply to comment by dnick in Qualcomm partners with Iridium to bring satellite messaging to Android phones by thebelsnickle1991
I agree - but I’ve always heard Iridium is slower because of the processing time or whatever occurs when linking satellites. I could have misheard
But if you read Iridium’s statement they say: faster than globalstar because we don’t require ground stations. That part makes zero sense.
Neo_Techni t1_j38dh9e wrote
Reply to comment by Theguy10000 in Qualcomm partners with Iridium to bring satellite messaging to Android phones by thebelsnickle1991
Yes, Time magazine still is in business
Ben-solo-11 t1_j38ckp4 wrote
Reply to comment by FeralCJ7 in Maca unveils its improved hydrogen-powered flying racecar at CES 2023 by diacewrb
So wizard.
dnick t1_j38c90i wrote
Reply to comment by doxx_in_the_box in Qualcomm partners with Iridium to bring satellite messaging to Android phones by thebelsnickle1991
I would assume that the time it takes to broadcast between satellites is negligible in the overall process (milliseconds?). If you could somehow save a second or two in overall connection time (on ground relays, finding a site that could route it more seemlessly, whatever), it wouldn't matter if you had to beam it back and forth between satellites 100 times to get it there, it could still be faster.
​
you could be right that the overall service might be way worse, but doubtful that 'beaming between satellites' vs direct ground retransmission would make any difference except in slight audio quality vs 'speed of emergency services being services being dispatched'.
wgc123 t1_j38bc4y wrote
Reply to comment by doxx_in_the_box in Qualcomm partners with Iridium to bring satellite messaging to Android phones by thebelsnickle1991
No, the confusing part is that when Apple released this feature, there were so many people saying it already existed on Android.
Hello-There-Im-Zach t1_j38amjp wrote
Reply to comment by Theguy10000 in Qualcomm partners with Iridium to bring satellite messaging to Android phones by thebelsnickle1991
Yes.
doug_thethug t1_j389jbl wrote
Reply to comment by TeamPixelGoogle in Qualcomm partners with Iridium to bring satellite messaging to Android phones by thebelsnickle1991
Pretty sure tensor runs on Samsung modems
ahecht t1_j38uu4m wrote
Reply to comment by doxx_in_the_box in Qualcomm partners with Iridium to bring satellite messaging to Android phones by thebelsnickle1991
The difference in latency caused by the time it takes light to travel to a satellite 500 miles up vs 900 miles up is fractions of a second, and meaningless compared to human reaction time when talking about an emergency response.