Recent comments in /f/gadgets

guareber t1_j1yuduf wrote

People see them as a selling point because a) no one wants to carry a DSLR on them at all times; and b) social media makes people want to take pictures 24/7

I, for one, know nothing of photography, don't have any pictures on social media, and still take all pictures at max size for the simple reason that I want to be able to zoom on my pc (with a vastly bigger resolution than a phone) without pixelation. I'd never spend iPhone moneys on a mobile phone, but I still try to get a good camera for my budget.

I'd argue refresh rate is meaningless for most users, though. I hardly notice the difference between my high refresh screen and my wife's standard 60.

1

Gozal_ t1_j1ytu97 wrote

I think we mostly need better sensors and optics. For landscape photography when you zoom in a bit you can see all the artificial processing and the lack of detail.
I do agree camera lenses are wider than they should be, like the main lens is more wide than I'd like, and then there's an ultra wide which is even wider.

3

diacewrb t1_j1yrxvd wrote

Samsung had the Galaxy K Zoom with a traditional zoom lens.

https://www.samsung.com/uk/smartphones/others/galaxy-k-zoom-black-8gb-sm-c1150zkabtu/

Sony did a range of cameras that used a prism and periscope for zooming, DSC-T9 should have been one of the models.

https://www.dpreview.com/articles/0708368277/sony-t9

3

ataraxia_ t1_j1yrfnm wrote

You should investigate wide angle landscape photography, my dude, because it definitely ‘works’ and could bring a whole heap of new photography opportunities to you if you take the time to work on the composition.

Plus it’ll let you use the camera you’ve got with you a little more.

0

theFrenchDutch t1_j1yoaq0 wrote

I'm into photography but not enough to actually carry a dedicated, bigger and cumbersome camera on me, especially when going hiking. So any advancement on phone camera optical zooms is exciting for me ! Already have a x2 optical zoom lens on my phone and it's not enough, wide angles don't work on landscape photography

2

wubbbalubbadubdub t1_j1ym8z2 wrote

People see it as a selling point because it's what's been marketed to them, the vast majority of smartphone users will never need a phone camera with more than a 20 megapixel sensor.

Screen resolution, screen refresh rate, battery size, processor, and storage are important.

0

AvidReader212 t1_j1ykv84 wrote

Have you heard the tale of Darth LG the Wise? I thought not, it is not a tale the iOS will tell you. It’s an Android legend.

Darth LG was a Dark Lord of the Android, so powerful and so wise he could use the Camera modules to influence the OEMs to create phones. He had such a knowledge of the dark side that he could even keep the ones he cared about from dying. The dark side of the Cellphone Market is a pathway to many abilities some consider to be unnatural.

He became so powerful, the only thing he was afraid of was losing his power, which eventually, of course, he did. Unfortunately, he taught his apprentice Samsung everything he knew, then his apprentice killed him in his sleep.

Ironic. He could save others from death, but not himself.

59

theFrenchDutch t1_j1ykjk8 wrote

Not in every situation at all. Landscape photography for example requires much more optical zoom than the wide angles that are on cameras. Buying a phone with x2 optical zoom was already a big boost to my photography during hikes and it still is FAR from enough to take the pictures you'd want to take with a real DLSR, going up to x30 and the like for satisfying pictures.

And this is exactly what they're going hard on, thank fuck. Wide and ultra wide don't need any more progress. I still don't want to go on hikes with a big camera, it's too cumbersome

20